Not banned by the Guardian: White nationalist crusader against the ‘Holohoax’


On Jan. 14, the Guardian published at report by Peter Walker titled ‘England’s football stars feature in Holocaust educational video film for schools, about Premier League footballers teaming up with the FA to produce a film for UK schools in which players discuss the impact of their recent tour of Auschwitz – part of a broader program by the Holocaust Educational Trust.

The report includes a short film explaining the context of the Holocaust before detailing the events and their impact on Europe’s Jews.

Though the report didn’t elicit too many reader comments, it did attract the attention of a few Holocaust “skeptics”. 

More people need to see “passed” [sic] the Holocaust propaganda.

two

Truth teller

holocaust comment 2

“Holohoax” Crusader

one

Though this comment by ‘CorshmCrusader’ was eventually deleted by moderators (along with the two others) it remained at the Guardian for roughly four hours, and garnered 118 expressions of support from fellow readers.

More interestingly, the user profile of CorshmCrusdader is still up and his user privileges do not seem to have been suspended – which is interesting in light of CiF editors’ decision to ban other users who evidently ran afoul of the Guardian’s “community standards”.

Here’s the profile:

profile

This profile evidently wasn’t flagged by editors despite the URL listed, which takes you to the site of a white nationalist group so extreme they have accused the BNP of being soft on Jews:

resist

The CiF commenter appears to be the Deputy Editor of the extremist site, who goes by the name of Mark Kennedy.

deputy

He even has his own graphic on the sidebar:

crusader

The graphic links to his YouTube Channel, where you can enjoy the following videos:

videosTo those still not convinced, a post on the site of ‘British Resistance’ on Jan. 15, by the site’s Editor (who posts using the moniker ‘Green Arrow’), bitterly complained about the deletion of the same comment by CorshmCrusader shown above, and clearly revealed the author’s identity.

“In an article written by a piece of human excrement with a fetish for people who wear Lycra, known as Peter Walker, The Guardian today published a story and a video on how the Jews, through the Holocaust Memorial Trust were intending to brainwash young British children by sending every single English secondary school a DVD containing a seven and half minute video about the Holohoax and other “teaching” materials.

“…our Deputy Editor, the Corsham Crusader, was onto the comments section quicker than a terrier on a rat and left a rather good post revealing the truth about the Holohoax and advising people who did not believe what he said, to simply go and do their own research.”

Consider sending a respectful email to Guardian editors requesting that the white supremacist using the moniker CorshmCrusader be banned.

comment.editors@guardian.co.uk

219 comments on “Not banned by the Guardian: White nationalist crusader against the ‘Holohoax’

  1. This is typical of the bottom feeding scum CiF regularly attracts and which makes its home there. He probably is very insecure about his masculinity and splits off and displaces his anger onto Jews, black people and, yes, Muslims, although he hasn’t the courage actually to spell that out.

    But he’s in excellent company as the Guardian whores itself for hits on threads.

  2. Anyone familiar with the Guardian’s editorial bias knows that if someone posted a comment directed at Muslims (or any other non-Jews) with a fraction of the blind hatred shown in those anti-Semitic comments he would be banned and his profile deleted along with all his previous comments faster than he could say, “Hey, what happened to my Guardian account?”

    • No I think that particular preserve is only held for the followers of Muhammad. You can be as nasty towards the Hindus/Sikhs/Jains/Budhists as you can towards the Christians and Jews, and you’ll attract most thumbs ups and may even become their most respected commentator.

      • There’s a lot of truth in that. Muslims alone have a very special immunity from criticism at the Guardian.

  3. I happened across the article yesterday too. I reported that last bit of puke, and as the page refreshed it’d been deleted. I went to his profile and saw he had no other posts – clearly a classic hate merchant troll who scours the Net looking to start trouble.
    But only now do I notice this wanker’s “commented on” section: England, football, the Holocaust and WWII! A pretty ominous combination without even having to read any of his drivel.

  4. Apparently this bloke gets some of his “information” from some of the same sources as “moderate” Mahmoud Abbas, the boys from Hamas, Hezbollah, Morsi and his brotherhood, etc, i.e., the 500 lb. gorilla in the room the MSM doesn’t want to deal with.

  5. I see the Football Association (FA) co-operated in the making of this propaganda film involving England footballers.

    Has the FA also condemned the bombing of Libya by NATO or the British government’s open policy of financing and providing arms to Islamic fundamentalist terrorists in Syria?

    No. It’s very perplexing to see they still condone the bombing of civilians, while warning the rest of us to ‘learn the lessons of history.’

    • & it’s similar to Obama’s crocodile tears over the Sandy Hook children while using drones to kill children elsewhere or his sponsers, the Israelis killing children in Gaza.
      I see hypocrisy everywhere & I don’t accept lectures from such hypocrites.

    • Also have you seen who is the President of the FA & who the last one was?
      It could just be a coincidence I guess.
      But I’m finding a lot of coincidences lately.

        • I didn’t say I found them everywhere.
          I find that accepting the mainstream view delusional & found treatment for that, may I suggest you do the same.

          • Not even full-blown psychotics find connections everywhere. But you’re right on track of delusional paranoia.

            • SerJew, I think you would make a very bad medical practitioner!
              But supposing this was true, it would mean you’re incapable of debating with your mental inferior?

  6. Did you know they had race riots in Tel Aviv at the same time as our footballers were being lectured about the perils of racism at Auschwitz?
    Maybe the wrong people went on the tour?

  7. It seems it’s fine for a member of the Israeli government to come out with statements such as ‘Israel is for the white man’. It also seems perfectly acceptable for the Israeli government to forcibly re-patriate black immigrants from it’s jewish white ‘utopia’, not to mention the apalling treatment meted out to christians living in Israel. But of course, these stories are very rarely reported in the mainstream media… I wonder why? ‘Racism’ cuts both ways…

    • Well at the risk of telling you what you already know but others don’t, the answer simply lies in who owns the media & their supporters & their allies.

      • I fully understand that Steve, I was simply reiterating an obvious point. To quote Voltaire, ‘In order to find out who is in control, find out who you are not allowed to criticise’.

          • You actually do remind me and other legitimate posters here of two things: the mission of this website is important, and even the stupidest trolls should have their dearth of fact firmly countered.

            • There we have it!
              Yours is the legitimate view, along with those who agree with you, whereas mine & the others is illegitimate.
              You can’t accept that others may have different world view to you based on their experiences?
              Then there is the issue of facts & truth which we are all entitled to debate but you may well disagree with that.

              • Steve and drmaximus. Views and opinions are always legitimate. But if you write, or endorse allegations that Israel sees itself as a “jewish white utopia” or that Christians are “treated appallingly” there, you must expect people to strongly disagree with you and to dismiss your views and opinions as those of dangerously ill-informed bigots, because such allegations are so far from any modicum of observable truth that they invite ridicule.

                It may be David Icke’s honest opinion that humanity is enslaved by a race of alien lizards disguised as humans, but he can hardly be surprised if his “views and opinions” are ridiculed and ignored.

                • The last thing I see Israel as is a “jewish white utopia”!
                  Why the small “j” on Jewish?
                  I can’t comment on Christians in Israel but I know they suffer in Egypt but that’s something else.
                  David Icke is mildly amusing but he doesn’t really inform me of much.
                  But strangely he is popular.
                  Maybe I think you are dangerously ill-informed bigots.

                • So, do you deny that Eli Yishai made this statement in June 2012 “Muslims that arrive here do not even believe that this country belongs to us, to the white man.” ?

                  Am I a ‘dangerously ill-informed bigot for quoting Eli Yishai?

                  Do you deny that this news article http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/9529123/Vatican-official-says-Israel-fostering-intolerance-of-Christianity.html is telling the truth?

                  Perhaps the many youtube video’s showing screaming Israeli youths yelling ‘we killed jesus’ and abusing christians in general were just well made Hollywood fakes? Heaven forbid that Hollywood could be used to spread such disinformation…

                • No, not all views are legitimate. Accepting this nonsense is part of the reason trolls are finding veritable paradises all over the net.

              • Steve: “Yours is the legitimate view, along with those who agree with you, whereas mine & the others is illegitimate”
                Immediately reminded me of a certain gibbering old captain:

                • You mind works in a strange way but I like Blackadder.
                  But you didn’t answer my point just more smoke mirrors & diversion.

              • “There we have it!”
                Yes indeed. And I’ll tell you why. You lie and misrepresent facts. That makes your opinions illegitimate. I can accept that you have a different view, but it’s a delusional, false one.

    • Well, your lunatic fringe’s hopes for news coverage that suits their warped POVs runs into two major problems: the real news media isn’t going to report on stories that don’t exist (like your tinfoil complaints about Christians in Israel) and isn’t going to report on stories you like without bringing up context and facts that undercut your false righteous anger (the disgusting “Israel for the white man” comment being condemned by the govt. and public, the issue of illegal immigration being at the heart of the African immigrant debate). Stick to the “alternative/progressive” press, where you can get your core beliefs nurtured and suckled to & you’ll be fine with that version of lies, thus leaving you wrongly assured you’re a progressive and a human rights crusader.

      • Yes well that depends on what you or I think is real news media, the one you believe issues stories generally acceptable to you but I have found from experience that it frequently omits stories or facts.
        From what I saw from Jewish sources the “Israel for the white man” thing seems to be supported by the rioters in Tel Aviv.

        • Yes well, of course there are those that believe all sorts of weird and wonderful things in this wold. Perhaps you can join the Flat Earth Society or blog with the 9-11 truthers. I am sure your fantasies will be sucked up with glee there, but don’t bother expecting to convince anyone rational or sane.

          • I find that Haaretz contains many articles critical of the Israeli government, perhaps you should try reading it sometime. Maybe I should start considering Haaretz to be a member of the ‘lunatic fringe’ too…

            • Lets look at another statement by Eli Yishai. “Why should we provide them with jobs? I’m sick of the bleeding hearts, including politicians. Jobs would settle them here, they’ll make babies, and that offer will only result in hundreds of thousands more coming over here.”

              Yishai repeated an earlier call for all migrants to be jailed pending deportation. “I want everyone to be able to walk the streets without fear or trepidation … The migrants are giving birth to hundreds of thousands, and the Zionist dream is dying,”

              Immigrants to be jailed pending deportation… Now where have I heard a statement like that before… It seems that history does indeed repeat itself…

              • Ah, misquoting Yishai, what a great past time: any Israel-hater’s favourite gambit…
                While I am no fan, here’s what he actually said:

                Muslims that arrive here do not even believe that this country belongs to us, to the white man.

                He was stating his opinion of the migrants’ beliefs, not his own.
                And furthermore, how could Yishai even claim that, given that he himself is not White(but of North African descent)?
                Finally on Christianity, are you aware that Israel is only country in the ME where the Christian population continues to grow?
                http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=297309

                • I think if you actually bothered to read my replies, I did indeed rephrase my original quote from Yishai to the correct one. ‘Muslims that arrive here do not even believe that this country belongs to us, to the white man’. It’s still a remarkably racist statement for a member of the Israeli government to make.

                • The statement, revolting as it may be, doesn’t change the fact that Yishai is not “White”, himself.
                  Therefore, since he wasn’t arguing for his own disenfranchisement, he was suggesting his own conception of the migrants’ view of Israel.

                • So why would he say “Muslims that arrive here do not even believe that this country belongs to us, to the white man.”
                  If he is not white surely he would say “Belongs to us & the white man?
                  But I don’t think Israel belongs to the white man, if you mean Europeans.

                • He was trying to argue — very ineptly too — that these migrants pose a problem by considering themselves to be the true proprietors of Israel.
                  He didn’t aver that Israel “belongs to the White man”, as I’ve already explained; he himself is not “White”.

                • Why don’t you nullify the statement on your own? Elaboration is unneccesary, the statement stands on it’s own merit.

                • Wow I went away for a few minutes & some of them have gone a bit berserk on here!
                  Some peoples egos seem very fragile if they can’t engage in polite debate or don’t they believe in the quotation at the top?

                • There it goes; stevo is challenged and immediately enters the whining mode. Next he’ll say he’s being intimidated and such BS. All paranoiacs seem to follow the standard routine.

                • Sorry SirJew but the whining appears to be coming from you along with paranoia & BS.
                  Can you discuss things calmly, rationally & sensibly?
                  Why the fragile ego, would you blow a gasket if you ran into a full blown Hitler loving Nazi?

                • That’s what I meant? Do you own a crystal ball? Tarot cards perhaps? History is filled with examples of ‘immigrants’ or other unwanted members of a population being jailed without just cause prior to ‘deportation’, usually with dire end results. Perhaps you can come up with some other definitions to describe what I meant? Don’t bother with anti-semite though, I’m fully aware that semites are not exclusively jews, and I fully support the rights of Palestinian Arabs to an independant homeland… Guess that also shoots the accusation of ‘racist’ down in flames too…

                • “Don’t bother with anti-semite though, I’m fully aware that semites are not exclusively jews,” dramaticus

                  Yeah, right. You forgot to mention your best friend is Jewish.

                • Semites are not all Jews, Jews are not all Semites.
                  What’s the problem with that?
                  I’m not sure if my best friend is Jewish, I’ll have to ask him.

                • So, are you saying that ‘semite’ is a descriptive term only used to describe jews? I don’t have any jewish friends to my knowledge. Do you?

                • I think there are many examples of that, Jews certainly place great store in knowing history & whether certain things will come to pass as do a lot of people.
                  In life you are supposed to learn from your & other peoples mistakes, to avoid that fate of history repeating itself, though there maybe bits of history that you want to repeat such as some historical victory.

                • “So, are you saying that ‘semite’ is a descriptive term only used to describe jews?” dramaticus

                  Just classical. Go find the meaning of ‘ANTI-semite’ in a dictionary. Or look yourself in a mirror.

                • I know the definition of ‘anti-semite’. Question is, do you know the definition of the word ‘semite’ ?

                • Good grief. That’s not the point, isn’t it. But, if you are soooooo unhappy with the terma anti-Semite, I can call you a Jew-hater or Judeophobe. Hope you’re happy now.

                • Sorry, stevo, you are the one complaining and victimizing yourself. As for paranoia, you are the one seeing a conspiracy of the press, not me.

      • ‘the disgusting “Israel for the white man” comment being condemned by the govt. and public’

        Care to provide a link to the Israeli government condemnation of this statement? I’d be more than happy to read it.

  8. Well, I must admit, I find the level of debate on this site quite depressing. Jaded insults, tired cliches and circular arguments. It’s been quite refreshing to actually see some stereotypes in action though…

  9. Anyway my mum’s calling me in for my tea, have a nice evening.
    I’ll come back to play another day.
    Since we’re being childish.
    Maybe it’ll be a bit more grown up another day.
    Take care.

  10. 216).RABBI RABINOVICH’S SPEECH OF JANUARY 12TH, 1952
    A report from Europe carried the following speech of Rabbi
    Emanuel Rabinovich before a special meeting of the Emergency
    Council of European Rabbis in Budapest, Hungary, January 12,
    1952: “Greetings, my children; You have been called her to
    recapitulate the principal steps of our new program. As you
    know, we had hoped to have twenty years between wars to
    consolidate the great gains which we made from World War II, but
    our increasing numbers in certain vital areas is arousing
    opposition to us, and we must now work with every means at our
    disposal to precipitate World War III within five years [They
    did not precipitate World War III but they did instigate the
    Korean War when on June 25, 1950 they ordered the North Korean
    army to launch a surprise attack on South Korea. On June 26, the
    U.N. Security Council condemned the invasion as aggression and
    ordered withdrawal of the invading forces. Then on June 27,
    1950, our Jewish American President Truman ordered air and naval
    units into action to enforce the U.N. order. Not achieving
    their full goals, they then instigated the overthrow of South
    Vietnam Ngo Dinh Diem, Premier under Bao Dai, who deposed the
    monarch in 1955 and established a republic with himself as
    President. Diem used strong U.S. backing to create an
    authoritarian regime, which soon grew into a fullscale war, with
    Jewish pressure escalating U.S. involvement].
    The goal for which we have striven so concertedly FOR THREE
    THOUSAND YEARS is at last within our reach, and because its
    fulfillment is so apparent, it behooves us to increase our
    efforts and our caution tenfold. I can safely promise you that
    before ten years have passed, our race will take its rightful
    place in the world, with every Jew a king and every Gentile a
    slave (Applause from the gathering). You remember the success
    of our propaganda campaign during the 1930′s, which aroused
    antiAmerican passions in Germany at the same time we were
    arousing antiGerman passions in America, a campaign which
    culminated in the Second World War. A similar propaganda
    campaign is now being waged intensively throughout the world. A
    war fever is being worked up in Russia by an incessant
    antiAmerican barrage while a nation wide antiCommunist scare is
    sweeping America. This campaign is forcing all the smaller
    nations to choose between the partnership of Russia or an
    alliance with the United States. Our most pressing problem at
    the moment is to inflame the lagging militaristic spirit of the
    Americans. The failure of the Universal Military Training Act
    was a great setback to our plans, but we are assured that a
    suitable measure will be rushed through Congress immediately
    after the 1952 elections. The Russians, as well as the Asiatic
    peoples, are well under control and offer no objections to war,
    but we must wait to secure the Americans. This we hope to do
    with the issue of ANTISEMITISM, which worked so well in uniting
    the Americans against Germany. We are counting heavily on
    reports of antiSemitic outrages in Russia to whip up indignation
    in the United States and produce a front of solidarity against
    the Soviet power. Simultaneously, to demonstrate to Americans
    the reality of antiSemitism, we will advance through new sources
    large sums of money to outspokenly antiSemitic elements in
    America to increase their effectiveness, and WE SHALL STAGE
    ANTISEMITIC OUTBREAKS IN SEVERAL OF THEIR LARGEST CITIES. This
    will serve the double purpose of exposing reactionary sectors
    in America, which then can be silenced, and of welding the
    United States into a devoted antiRussian unit. (Note: Protocol
    of Zion No. 9, para. 2, states that antiSemitism is controlled
    by them. At the time of this speech they had already commenced
    their campaign ofantiSemitism in Czechoslovakia). Within five
    years, this program will achieve its objective, the Third World
    War, which will surpass in destruction all previous contests.
    Israeli, of course, will remain neutral, and when both sides
    are devastated and exhausted, we will arbitrate, sending our
    Control Commissions into all wrecked countries. This war will
    end for all time our struggle against the Gentiles.
    WE WILL OPENLY REVEAL OUR IDENTITY WITH THE RACES OF ASIA
    AND AFRICA. I can state with assurance that the last generation
    of white children is now being born. Our Control Commissions
    will, in the interests of peace and wiping out interracial
    tensions.
    FORBID THE WHITES TO MATE WITH WHITES. The White Women must
    cohabit with members of the dark races, the White Men with
    black women. THUS THE WHITE RACE WILL DISAPPEAR, FOR THE MIXING
    OF THE DARK WITH THE WHITE MEANS THE END OF THE WHITE MAN, AND
    OUR MOST DANGEROUS ENEMY WILL BECOME ONLY A MEMORY. We shall
    embark upon an era of ten thousand years of peace and plenty,
    the Pax Judaica, and our race will rule undisputed over the
    world. Our superior intelligence will easily enable us to
    retain mastery over a world of dark peoples.
    Question from the gathering: Rabbi Rabinovich, what about
    the various religions after the Third World War?
    Rabinovich: There will be no more religions. Not only would
    the existence of a priest class remain a constant danger to our
    rule, but belief in an afterlife would give spiritual strength
    to irreconcilable elements in many countries, and enable them
    to resist us. We will, however, retain the rituals and customs
    of Judaism as the mark of our hereditary ruling caste,
    strengthening our racial laws so that no Jew will be allowed to
    marry outside our race, nor will any stranger be accepted by
    us. (Note: Protocol of Zion No. 17 para. 2, states: ‘Now that
    freedom of conscience has been declared everywhere (as a result
    of their efforts they have previously stated) only years divide
    us from the moment of THE COMPLETE WRECKING OF THAT [Hated]
    CHRISTIAN RELIGION. As to other religions, we shall have still
    less difficulty with them.’)
    We may have to repeat the grim days of World War II, when
    we were forced to let the Hitlerite bandits sacrifice some of
    our people, in order that we may have adequate documentation
    and witnesses to legally justify our trial and execution of the
    leaders of America and Russia as war criminals, after we have
    dictated the peace. I am sure you will need little preparation
    for such a duty, for sacrifice has always been the watchword of
    our people, and the DEATH OF A FEW THOUSAND JEWS in exchange
    for world leadership is indeed a SMALL PRICE TO PAY. To
    convince you of the certainty of that leadership, let me point
    out to you how we have turned all of the inventions of the
    White Man into weapons against him. HIS PRINTING PRESSES AND
    RADIOS are the MOUTHPIECES OF OUR DESIRES, and his heavy
    industry manufactures the instruments which he sends out to arm
    Asia and Africa against him.
    Our interests in Washington are greatly extending the POINT
    FOUR PROGRAM (viz. COLOMBO PLAN) for developing industry in
    backward areas of the world, so that after the industrial
    plants and cities of Europe and America are destroyed by atomic
    warfare, the Whites can offer no resistance against the large
    masses of the dark races, who will maintain an unchallenged
    technological superiority. And so, with the vision of world
    victory before you, go back to your countries and intensify
    your good work, until that approaching day when Israeli will
    reveal herself in all her glorious destiny as the Light of the
    World.” (Note: Every statement made by Rabinovich is based on
    agenda contained in the “Protocols of Zion.”)

  11. 8). “Kill the Germans, wherever you find them! Every German
    is our moral enemy. Have no mercy on women, children, or the
    aged! Kill every German wipe them out!” (Llya Ehrenburg,
    Glaser, p. 111).

    9). “Germany is the enemy of Judaism and must be pursued
    with deadly hatred. The goal of Judaism of today is: a
    merciless campaign against all German peoples and the complete
    destruction of the nation. We demand a complete blockade of
    trade, the importation of raw materials stopped, and
    retaliation towards every German, woman and child.” (Jewish
    professor A. Kulischer, October, 1937)

    10). “The millions of Jews who live in America, England and
    France, North and South Africa, and, not to forget those in
    Palestine, are determined to bring the war of annihilation
    against Germany to its final end.” (The Jewish newspaper,
    Central Blad Voor Israeliten in Nederland, September 13, 1939)

    11). “Our fight against Germany must be carried to the
    limit of what is possible. Israel has been attacked. Let us,
    therefore, defend Israel! Against the awakened Germany, we put
    an awakened Israel. And the world will defend us.” (Jewish
    author Pierre Creange in his book Epitres aux Juifs, 1938)

    12) “Judea declares War on Germany.” (Daily Express, March
    24, 1934)

    13). “Germany must be turned into a waste land, as happened
    there during the 30year War.” (Das MorgenthauTagebuch, The
    Morgenthau Dairy, p. 11).

    14). “The fight against Germany has now been waged for
    months by every Jewish community, on every conference, in all
    labor unions and by every single Jew in the world. There are
    reasons for the assumption that our share in this fight is of
    general importance. We shall start a spiritual and material war
    of the whole world against Germany. Germany is striving to
    become once again a great nation, and to recover her lost
    territories as well as her colonies. But our Jewish interests
    call for the complete destruction of Germany…” (Valadimir
    Jabotinsky, in Mascha Rjetsch, January, 1934)

    15) “In fact, about 600 newspapers were officially banned
    during 1933. Others were unofficially silenced by street
    methods. The exceptions included Judische Rundschau, the ZVfD’s
    Weekly and several other Jewish publications. German Zionism’s
    weekly was hawked on street corners and displayed at news
    stands. When Chaim Arlosoroff visited Zionist headquarters in
    London on June 1, he emphasized, ‘The Rundschau is of crucial
    Rundschau circulation had in fact jumped to more than 38,000
    four to five times its 1932 circulation. Although many
    influential Aryan publications were forced to restrict their
    page size to conserve newsprint, Judische Rundschau was not
    affected until mandatory newsprint rationing in 1937.
    And while stringent censorship of all German publications
    was enforced from the outset, Judische Rundschau was allowed
    relative press freedoms. Although two issues of it were
    suppressed when they published Chaim Arlosoroff’s outline for a
    capital transfer, such seizures were rare. Other than the ban
    on antiNazi boycott references, printing atrocity stories, and
    criticizing the Reich, Judische Rundschau was essentially exempt
    from the socalled Gleichschaltung or ‘uniformity’ demanded by
    the Nazi Party of all facets of German society. Juedische
    Rundschau was free to preach Zionism as a wholly separate
    political philosophy indeed, the only separate political
    philosophy sanction by the Third Reich.” (This shows the Jewish
    Zionists enjoyed a visibly protected political status in
    Germany, prior to World War II).

      • No hysterics here, simply copying over from a site written and run by jews about jews. And yet you accuse me of hate. I know that the protocols are a fabrication, all I did was copy them. Maybe its you that is hysterical. My question to you though sir, is this. If it is so hatefull to deny the holocaust, why not have the international investigation , attended by all the imprisoned revisionists?

  12. I’ve got a great idea, why don’t you make loads of money & buy the Guardian, then it would have to do what you told it to do, rather than ignore you as it does now.
    I wouldn’t do that as I believe in free speech.

    • You are irritated by the impact of cifwatch on the Guardian.
      That`s why you are here, for the defence of poor, old Guardian who is in need of such limited people for apology.

      • LOL!
        I hate the Guardian & this rubbish has no impact on it whatsoever!
        This is a fantasy world.
        But very funny & entertaining.

  13. Explain why the Guardian would take any notice of this website?
    It would be like the Queen giving a hoot about what the BNP thinks.
    What’s the ratings of this site, does anybody important notice it?

    • What’s the ratings of this site, does anybody important notice it?

      Dunno, but irrelevant Jew-hating psychos like yourself feel very upset about it and come here trying to disrupt. Don’t whine when you get banned.

      • Didn’t you notice this whole site is about whining & whinging, surely you’re not that stupid?
        A good 3 years of it & the Guardian doesn’t seem to see your POV yet.
        Keep going!

      • I hate zionists not Jews but in your mind they have to be in the same thing.
        I understand why you do that.
        I won’t whine if I’m banned as I will have proved that the quotation at the top of this blog is only meant to apply to you & not any real opposition.

  14. Why the Guardian takes notice?
    Ask yourself why do you take notice of cifwatch, irritated and nervous.
    Obviously Technorati doesn`t mean anything for you – so not only faker, but ignorant too.

    • I think you’re as fake as your name & you’re the one exhibiting irritation & nervousness.
      Technorati means little to a lot of people & the Guardian probably doesn’t care much either.

      • Your defence of the Guardian is fun with regards to your hate of the newspaper.
        Looks like you are suffering from mental instability.

        • You’re the one that is confused, I’m not defending the Guardian, I’m having a go at you & your dumb zio friends who think that the Guardian gives a toss about your badly expressed opinons.

    • Technorati is just a list, it’s like saying I’m in the phone book, so what, it doesn’t mean anybody will phone you.

  15. I assume that the reason you pick on the Guardian as opposed to the rest of the equally rubbish MSM is that you think you might have a chance of making it a slave to your views, I think it’ll go bust first.

  16. To the Guardian:
    To the editors:

    As a Holocaust educator, it is disturbing that you treat the individual using the moniker “CorshmCrusader,” who is known to be a white supremacist, as you would any other “contributor” to your periodical; and yet, you “premoderate” the likes of Adam Levick who obviously disagrees with you. Who is allowed freedom of speech in your domain? Everyone? Or just those who tow the line with regard to your ideological anti-Jewish bias?

    I just taught 1984 by George Orwell in an upper division secondary English class. Your decisions in this regard seem quite in line with Ministry of Truth standards.

    ~ Daniel Hennessy

Comments are closed.