What the Guardian won’t report: Israel wins at the UN. Israeli culture wins in the Middle East


On Dec. 21, 2012, a UN resolution on “Entrepreneurship for Development” was proposed by Israel, along with 97 co-sponsors.

The resolution encourages private and public sector entrepreneurship, “developing new technologies and innovative business models, and enabling high, sustained, inclusive and equitable economic growth while protecting the rights of workers as the best way to deal with the challenges of poverty and job creation.”

Israel’s Ambassador to the UN, Ron Prosor, said the following:

“The Israeli spirit of entrepreneurship and creativity prevailed at the UN today.  As a state that was founded in difficult circumstances, we have been able to create opportunities for talented people and have become an enterprising superpower. Creating a culture of entrepreneurship can work miracles and drive economies forward. Investing in human resources is a real message that Israel conveys to the developing world.”

The UN adopted it by a vote of 141 in favor to 31 against, with 11 abstentions.

The Guardian – which continually informs their readers when the UN censures the Jewish state – hasn’t reported the Israeli sponsored resolution.

Why does it matter?

If you recall, there was a huge row over comments during the US Presidential campaign suggesting that Israeli culture is a major factor in the state’s economic and social prowess in the region.  

Many commentators on the far left (including ‘Comment is Free’ contributor Rachel Shabi) scolded those who would suggest a connection between culture and success – imputing racism to such arguments.

Shabi characterized the broader narrative that Israeli culture may be more conducive to success than Palestinian culture as “standard-issue superiority complex racism”.

To those so easily manipulated by au courant post-colonial causation, the stubborn reality of Israeli success (as with Western success more broadly) must be explained by Western hegemony or other global injustices.

To the far-left crowd which occupies the Guardian, the word “racism” – typically understood as a belief in the inherent, immutable, biological or genetic inferiority of a group, race, or ethnicity – has been defined so expansively as to even impute such bigotry to those observing intuitively that some cultural habits are necessarily inimical to economic achievement and social development.

Now, take a look at the countries who voted against the Israeli resolution advocating “entrepreneurship for development”.

Algeria, Bahrain, Bolivia, Comoros, Cuba, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Djibouti, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritania, Morocco, Nicaragua, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Venezuela, Yemen.

Do you see a pattern?

A strong majority of these states are plagued by poverty, under-development and despotism – and would greatly benefit from the ‘development through entrepreneurship’ growth strategy recommended by Israel.

Unfortunately, the majority of these states are opposed to Israel’s very existence, and some have a shameful history of having ethnically cleansed their Jewish citizens in the twenty years following 1948.

The resolution, based on the most intuitive reasoning, was opposed because it was the Jewish state which proposed it.

By obsessing over Israel, refusing to concentrate on the real problems plaguing their societies, and failing to instill the liberal cultural habits necessary to alleviate poverty and throw off the yoke of tyranny – as well as ignoring the lessons on how a small, innovative, Jewish country accomplished so much in just six and a half decades – they ensure that little progress will likely be achieved.

Those in the West who continue  to indulge such nations in the fantasy that their anti-Zionist delusions are justified, even righteous, are complicit in condemning millions to poverty, tyranny and hopelessness.

14 comments on “What the Guardian won’t report: Israel wins at the UN. Israeli culture wins in the Middle East

  1. “To the far-left crowd which occupies the Guardian the word ‘racism’…”

    When I first glanced at that phrase I thought it said “the far-left which occupies the word ‘racism’.”

  2. How can any country be against entrepreneurship? It shows both the culture gap and the incredible political agenda that has so successfully destroyed the economies of so many Middle Eastern and African countries.

    Israel should sponsor a resolution stating that breathing is a basic human right, and see how many countries vote against it!!

  3. “developing new technologies and innovative business models, and enabling high, sustained, inclusive and equitable economic growth while protecting the rights of workers as the best way to deal with the challenges of poverty and job creation.”

    What’s to complain about there? Ah yes … the source, of course.

    Now, take a look at the countries who voted against the Israeli resolution advocating “entrepreneurship for development … Do you see a pattern?

    Good God, even I can see it!

    Pathetic.

    • This is not the first time such a pattern imerged in trivial matters being brought up by Israel, and sadly it will not be the last.

      Journalists should challange those countries in asking them point blank questions about what exactly did they oppose?

      • Re. Journalists

        I agree absolutely. It’s a crucial point, because it’s not just about some ultimately meaningless resolution.
        For journalists it should be about the hatred of Israel across the Arab/Muslim world – a not unimportant factor in Israeli policy and mentality.

  4. Pingback: Israel, Its Foes, and the Plain Truth

  5. And who were the 11 countries that abstained? Can we be told? Or at least told where to look for the link?

    • Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Brunei Darussalam, China, Ecuador, Mali, Mauritius, Namibia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Zimbabwe.
      With the exception of China they are all the giants of scientific, technological and social progress.

    • How low will south africa sink? and China… as for the rest, they are no different than those who voted against it.

  6. Who cares. It’s their loss in that they remain failed despotic third world countries . On that basis they can do little actual harm to Israel . Let them remain firmly entrenched in their medievalism .

Comments are closed.