Harriet Sherwood celebrates ‘Int’l Women’s Day’ by championing the cause of Islamic Jihad terrorist


On March 8, the Guardian published “International Women’s Day highlights hurdles obstructing women“, (co-authored by 12 Guardian correspondents, including Harriet Sherwood), on the subjugation of women around the world.

The report didn’t mention female genital mutilation, which is practiced in 28 countries in Africa and parts of the Middle East, which between 100 and 140 million girls and women are estimated to have undergone.

There was similarly no mention of honor killings –  5000 women a year who are murdered (mostly in the Middle East and SW Asia) by their family for dressing in an unacceptable manner, wanting to prevent an arranged marriage, engaging in sex outside marriage, or being in a same sex relationship.

While many of the contributors to the report on the oppression of women across the world dealt with economic inequalities and abortion rights in the West, there wasn’t much to suggest the endemic culture of misogyny and gender apartheid throughout the Middle East.

Harriet Sherwood not only ignored such egregious systemic oppression of women in the Palestinian territories, but devoted 118 words  in a 750 word essay about Israel’s detention of a female Palestinian Islamic Jihad terrorist named Hana Shalabi.  

Here are the passages:

Palestinian human rights groups and activists drew attention to the three-week hunger strike of Hana Shalabi who has been held in an Israeli prison without charge since being arrested on 16 February.

Shalabi, 29, claims she was forcibly strip-searched and assaulted by a male Israeli soldier, beaten and blindfolded. Her six-month sentence of “administrative detention” has since been reduced to four months, but she says she will refuse food until freed.

Shalabi, who was released from an earlier period of administrative detention last October, is one of seven Palestinian women currently held in Israeli jails.

Israeli troops fired teargas at a woman’s protest march over her detention in the West Bank. About 500 women also marched in Gaza.

So, Sherwood not only evidently takes the PIJ terrorist’s claims of being beaten by Israeli authorities at face value, but, more broadly, sees the detention of a women who’s a member of a terrorist group (which aspires to create a strict Islamist state “from the river to the sea”, and which has sent women on suicide bombing missions) as an embodiment of womens’ search for equality.

Khader Adnan-style poster of Shalabi (the human rights martyr) courtesy of Ireland's Palestine Solidarity Campaign.

Meanwhile, across the green line, and well beyond Sherwood’s moral sympathy, the Palestinian Authority, using a clause in the Jordanian penal code still in effect in the West Bank, exempts men from being punished for killing a female relative if she has brought dishonor to the family.

The code (which has been repealed by Jordan, but is still in effect in Gaza and the PA controlled West Bank), reads:

“He who surprises his wife, or one of his [female] Mahrams [mother, daughters or sisters] committing adultery with somebody [in flagrante delicto], and kills, wounds, or injures one or both of them, shall be exempt from liability.” 

Here’s a photo you’ll never see on the pages of the Guardian – Ayah Barad’iyya, a 21-year-old English major at Hebron University, victim of a Palestinian honor killing (by her Uncle) in 2010.

No, I know Harriet, such Palestinian on Palestinian violence is not part of the desired narrative. 

5 comments on “Harriet Sherwood celebrates ‘Int’l Women’s Day’ by championing the cause of Islamic Jihad terrorist

  1. Yup, coz nothing says “feminism” like hacking off a little girl’s clitoris, beating your wife for “dressing wrong” or throwing acid in the faces of young women with the temerity to seek out literacy and education.

  2. Absolutely disgusting. Four paragraphs to criticise the ONLY country in the Middle East where any sort of equality exists for women. Unless, of course, by “equality” you mean the equal opportunity to become a suicide bomber.

    No mention in the article of Saudi Arabia – the only nation still refusing to send a single female athlete to the Olympics?

  3. At one of the events held by the U.N.H.R.C. on March 8th for International Womens Day, Stephen Lewis Co-Director of AIDS-Free World concluded his remarks with this indictment of U.N. and U.N.H.R.C hypocrisy;

    “So I must ask: why does the Security Council call for naming and shaming and then observe the omission of Zimbabwe without so much as a word? Nor, I might add, a word from the Human Rights Council. What hold does Robert Mugabe have on the Permanent Members of the Security Council, or on the member governments of the Human Rights Council? Does no one recognize the blow to the public credibility of the UN in both New York and Geneva when such obvious matters of principle are discarded?

    It can’t be allowed to go on. Zimbabwe is now — by fact, by logic, by circumstance, by morality, by behavior — an organic extension of the Secretary-General’s report. It’s a travesty that of all the countries named, Zimbabwe is missing.

    It smacks of a dreadful hypocrisy; it’s an unsettling glimpse into what might be called the collusion of camaraderie … that cozy male bonding when everyone agrees, behind closed doors, to be silent. It shows unsettling contempt for the women of Zimbabwe who have been raped by President Mugabe’s henchmen.

    Someone has to correct this wrong. Neither the Secretary-General himself nor a single member of the Security Council can explain or defend it. Not after the words in the report.”

    Hypocrisy at the U.N. and the Human Rights Council and of course at The Guardian.

  4. Why do these people ignore every singe sick crime (and there are thousands of them) that these Muslims commit,yet these Muslims get a free pass and these crimes never get brought up.

    Instead these people write articles and pick on every single imaginary sin that Israel has committed.

    The media keeps announcing that the poor terrorists of Gaza are being pounded by Israel.Not a single word of why Israel is responding to these missiles.

    Israeli Hasbara sucks miserably and something needs to be done about it…..The palestinians could teach us a thing or two,on how to get their false messages across………

Comments are closed.