We’ll comment later more extensively on “Letters: Israel’s stance in the community of nations“, Oct. 6, which includes a letter signed by dozens of anti-Israel activists accusing Israel of ethnic cleansing, and another which accuses Israeli leaders of being “war criminals”.
But I wanted to focus on this one, which argues that the EU should not allow Israel to host an under-21 European football tournament and, more broadly, should exclude the Jewish state from the community of nations.
• Those who lead European football must respond to an appeal from Palestinians dismayed at the prospect of Israel hosting Uefa’s under-21 tournament in 2013. A state that uses military might to hold sway over land it illegally occupies and exploits, flouts international law and ignores UN resolutions surely forfeits the right to be treated as a member of the community of nations. But western powers continue to embrace Israel as an ally. [emphasis mine]
During the 2011 under-21 tournament in Denmark in June, 42 Gazan football clubs, backed by many sporting bodies, wrote to Uefa president Michel Platini calling on his organisation not “to reward Israel for its violent repression of Palestinian rights”. We ask Uefa to respond positively to this plea.
The letter is signed by:
Ken Loach, a film maker who’s accused Israel of adopting a policy of Nazi-like ”racial purity”,
Miriam Margolyes: A UK actress who has argued that Israel’s behavior causes antisemitism and makes her ashamed to be a Jew.
Nurit Peled: An Israeli academic who is opposed to Israel’s existence as a Jewish state, characterizes Zionism as inherently racist, and has justified suicide bombing as “the direct consequence of the oppression, slavery, humiliation and state of siege imposed on the Palestinians.”
John Pilger: An Australian journalist who routinely compares Israel to Nazi Germany, and even once even participated in a cross-border terrorist raid by members of the Palestinian Front for the Liberation of Palestine.
Jean Ziegler: Vice-president, advisory committee of the UN human rights council, who has promoted the work of Holocaust Denier Roger Garaudy, has referred to Israel’s leaders as “state terrorists”, and has depicted Israel in Nazi terms.
Such activists don’t target, for international opprobrium, for some reason, the countries who, according to Freedom House, are the world’s worst human rights records – such as North Korea, China, Cuba, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Burma, Somalia, & Sudan – but, rather, the nation with the best human rights record in the Middle East by far.
So, Israel, in the eyes of these sage jurists, has lost the right to be treated as a member of the community of nations and should be completely isolated by the international community – a view which the Guardian at least finds within the boundaries of respectable liberal thought.
The decision to publish this letter by such rabid Israel haters and antisemites is just another example of the truth behind Robin Shepherd’s recent observation that “No mainstream media outfit in the Western world has been more hostile to Israel than the Guardian.”






12 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 6, 2011 at 10:15 am
Derek Pasquill
If this trend continues Israel might well become the only country worthy of belonging to a ‘community of nations,’ the rest having succumbed to a surfeit of anti-semitism.
I would not want to belong to a nation in which a newspaper such as the Guardian had any sort of influence or was even considered respectable.
October 6, 2011 at 10:17 am
JerusalemMite
Such activists don’t target, for international opprobrium, for some reason, the countries who, according to Freedom House, are the world’s worst human rights records – such as North Korea, China, Cuba, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Burma, Somalia, & Sudan – but, rather, the nation with the best human rights record in the Middle East by far.
Isn’t that just the bottom line for ‘these people’.
It is a sickness. Apartheid South Africa has disappeared. They are looking for a ’cause’ and Israel is to pro America by far.
Forget China. Forget Darfur. Forget Turkish oppression of Kurds.
It is Israel, Israel, Israel.
It really is a sickness.
October 6, 2011 at 11:10 am
Thank God I'm An Infidel
“It really is a sickness.”
And that sickness is SOCIALISM.
October 6, 2011 at 10:52 am
AKUS
Apart from the others in this crowd, the idea of a white colonialist Australian criticizing Israel, when Australians have an absolutely despicable record with regard to the Aborigines who were decimated despite the enormous size of the country, surely large enough for a few million Aborigines along with 20 or 30 million colonists,is utterly ludicrous.
October 9, 2011 at 3:35 pm
Makabit
Folks like this (based on my experience with American equivalents), will readily cop to living on occupied native land–but nevertheless feel that they get to criticize Israel, and Israel does not get to criticize them. Because they’re sensitive to the oppressed indigenous peoples, see, even if they’ve never actually met one.
October 14, 2011 at 7:29 pm
Ariadne
Or know what “indigenous” means!
October 6, 2011 at 11:01 am
tlozuk
Maybe we should write to UEFA and ask them to prevent Gazan football clubs from playing, wouldn’t want UEFA to promote hatred and terrorism in its purest form now would we?
October 6, 2011 at 12:48 pm
RoMo
I was in Cali, Colombia this July when it hosted the U-21s. The streets were full of paramilitary and police but it felt very, very safe. I’d say that Colombia has had a very chequered past and who knows how many people have been murdered in the drugs wars until now. I suppose it’s ok – Colombians kidnapping and murdering foreigners and Colombians. Didn’t hear a peep from any of these ‘do-gooders,’ did we?
October 6, 2011 at 1:32 pm
Mitnaged
Signed by the usual suspects:
an out and out liar (Pilger about the Jenin “massacre” and other matters)
an “ashamed Jew” (not as ashamed as I am that Ms Gargoyles continues to refer to herself as a Jew)
an apologist for the UN and supporter of lies and liars (’nuff said)
and what has come to be a staple in such things an Israeli academic (probably one who didn’t get the recognition she felt entitled to and is bitter and twisted as a result).
All of them at least troubled and in some cases disturbed.
Why is anyone surprised? This is, after all, the Guardian in all its cesspit nastiness.
And yes, JersualemMite, it IS an obsessional neurosis
October 6, 2011 at 2:49 pm
pretzelberg
Loach, Margoyles and Pilger are hardly the most objective observers. Anything signed by them is likely to be dodgy – and lo and behold …
October 6, 2011 at 5:21 pm
ziontruth
“Community of nations” in the neo-Marxist context means the internationalist order of things, where nations are called to give up their exclusive political rights within their nation-states in favor of the “global village” of multiculturalism that posits the state to be mere space for rent, and the nation to be simply the aggregate of whatever human beings happen to reside now on said space.
For Israel to lose its right to be counted as a member of such a “community of nation” and, instead, to become a beacon and model for every nation struggling to maintain its sovereignty in the face of Marxist/Islamist encroachment, is the highest honor a nation-state could attain in our day and age. I can only hope Israel’s leaving of such internationalist dens of vipers as the United Nations will come soon.
October 8, 2011 at 6:08 pm
yitzhakineretzyiz
The question isn’t whether Al-Guardian is anti-Semitic, because it has long ago demonstrated this to be the case. The question isn’t whether anti-Semites deserve to be dragged from their homes and machine-gunned to death like the rabid curs they are, because that, too, is beyond doubt. No, the question is: why does no one stand up and expose the blatant lies that the Fakestinians peddle day in, day out? ‘Occupation’? The only ‘occupation’ is that being practiced by Arabs who stole Israeli land. ‘International law’? Israel is in violation of no international law. ‘illegal settlements’? There is no such thing as an ‘illegal’ Jewish ‘settlement’. Why are these lies not exposed? Why are even sites which are sympathetic to Israel using the language of the Fakestinians? “West Bank”? What “West Bank”? The region is called Judea & Samaria. “Palestinian”? There is no such people. They are ethnic Jordanians, Syrians and Egyptians. Why are we using the lexicon of the vermin who would destroy us?