A guest post by AKUS
The Guardian consistently posts Sherwood’s columns without allowing comments.
This is sensible from their point of view since, more than almost anyone, her ignorance and viciously anti-Israeli bias bring out furious comments pointing out her errors from all those who know anything at all about Israel and genuinely care for the country.
However, occasionally, her blog, View from Jerusalem with Harriet Sherwood, does allow for reader comments.
Her latest effort is a typical Guardian piece, full of unsubstantiated anti-Israeli throw-away lines – a weepy piece about “Palestinian children” being arrested at night. Quite characteristically, all we are told is that the sleeping “children”, perhaps exhausted after a day’s fun throwing rocks at Israeli soldiers, were older than 10 years of age. The full “horror” of the event is captured in the line:
“They wrote down the numbers and took pictures of the boys. Then they said they could go back to sleep.”
Why was this done? Well, Sherwood quotes an indignant B’Tselem report, as if rock-throwing Arab teenagers (and younger children) or teenage suicide bombers were something unknown:
“The photos were taken for what the army calls ‘mapping’: the army did not have any basis for suspecting any particular minor they awoke to photograph, but they wanted to build a reservoir of pictures they could later use for identification purposes, should the minor be involved in stone-throwing or other violent activity”.
In fact, that is rather reminiscent of the police in England using photo identification to prosecute teenage rioters. However, unlike the British police who have covered England with CCTV cameras, the IDF does not install CCTV cameras on every street corner on the West Bank to monitor the activities of every teenager, and is resorting to other means to achieve a similar objective.
But it was actually in response to comments below the line that the full banality of this unutterably stupid and evil reporter was revealed.
In response to the column, londonae wrote the following, pointing out the difference between Sherwood’s indignation about waking up children in the middle of the night and her silence over the murder of an Israeli father and child by rock-throwing Arabs:
To which, Sherwood casually responded that, indeed, she had not allowed their deaths to go “unnoticed”:
Frequent commenter SantaMoniker pointed out just how callous Sherwood’s comment was. Sherwood wrote an entire column mourning the death of a rock-throwing West Bank Arab, while “noticing” the deaths of Asher Palmer and son in passing in an article that once again made the ridiculous claim that apartments in Jerusalem are “settlements”:
It is a mystery to me why Israel allows the Guardian to maintain any reporter in Israel, and Sherwood in particular.
She is a walking example of the banality of evil – those who care little for the death of Jews while sanctimoniously condemning every slight or indignity suffered by Arabs, even terrorists openly committed to the Jewish state’s destruction.
Related articles
- Harriet Sherwood’s truncated history of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (cifwatch.com)
- Harriet Sherwood defames Israel with claim of “Jews only” public accommodations (cifwatch.com)
- 2010: Not Harriet Sherwood’s Finest Year (Part 1 of 2) (cifwatch.com)
- Harriet Sherwood assumes peaceful intent of Palestinian resistance in Sept, despite prior violence (cifwatch.com)
- Harriet Sherwood’s shocking report! Israel detains Palestinians who, umm, riot and commit acts of violence (cifwatch.com)
- Harriet Sherwood finds her favorite kind of Israeli – the anti-Zionist variety (cifwatch.com)
- Harriet Sherwood’s latest report erases the humanity of Israeli victims of Palestinian terrorism (cifwatch.com)
- What Harriet Sherwood won’t report: Hamas bans Palestinian merit scholars from leaving Gaza (cifwatch.com)
- 2010: Not Harriet Sherwood’s Finest Year (Part 2 of 2) (cifwatch.com)
- Israel fires back at Harriet Sherwood (cifwatch.com)









3 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 2, 2011 at 7:28 am
Arabella Meller
What an insight into the Guardian and its intentions towards Israel we are receiving as they allow Harriet Sherwood to continue sending her biased and frequently faulty pieces from Israel despite the articles in Cifwatch from various contributors pointing out her errors and omissions.
Sherwood makes no effort to give a balanced picture of the Israeli scene. She is an op-ed writer giving partial views with facts carefully picked to persuade, posing as a reporter.
Perhaps the Guardian should print a recommendation to read Cifwatch next to each of her articles for those who want an accurate picture.
October 2, 2011 at 9:02 am
JerusalemMite
Frequent commenter SantaMoniker pointed out just how callous Sherwood’s comment was. Sherwood wrote an entire column mourning the death of a rock-throwing West Bank Arab, while “noticing” the deaths of Asher Palmer and son in passing in an article that once again made the ridiculous claim that apartments in Jerusalem are “settlements”:
Yes. I’ve noticed the pattern of Harriet Sherwood’s hate Israel writings being without comment. One can certainly understand why she got the job.
‘Guardian reporter in Jerusalem’. One wonders why there isn’t a ‘Guardian reporter in Damascus’? Or ‘Guardian reporter in Tripoli’? (Just joking).
Or ‘Guardian reporter in Sudan’ where people are dying every day as a direct or indirect result of inter Muslim violence. It’s quite dangerous in Darfur I believe. Not comparable to the American Colony hotel in (comfortable and safe) Jerusalem.
Or a Guardian reporter in Turkey to report on the injustices that some Kurds suffer every day from the Islamist Erdogan regime.
What a fake The Guardian has become. It ignores great tragedy’s in the world and instead continuously looks for smut on the ‘evil Zionist entity’.
It is no longer a newspaper. It is a propaganda organ of the extreme delusional anarchist left posing as a news paper.
October 3, 2011 at 3:51 pm
Brian Goldfarb
Harriet Sherwood is one of the prices Israel pays for being a democracy. In the end, a price just about worth paying given the political alternatives for Israel. It’s of a piece with the heavily pro-Palestinian reporter taken hostage by a Gazan gang.When released, where did he go, immediately? Where else but into Israel.
He, of course, didn’t see the irony of his destination. Please remind me, someone, was it Alan Hart?