As with so many reports of Israeli villainy, Jonathan Glennie’s Guardian piece, “Aid alone won’t help the desperate Palestinians“, Aug. 24 – which blames Palestinian economic problems on Israel’s “checkpoints, the separation wall, and general restrictions on the movement of people and goods” – doesn’t once acknowledge Palestinian moral agency.
Reading Glennie’s report, which completely erases the context of terrorism, you’d think that such defensive measures weren’t motivated by legitimate security concerns as the result of the 2nd Intifada but, rather, by Israeli malice.
Glennie argues:
“Israel continues [their] attempts to undermine any chance the [Palestinian] economy has to get back on its feet, let alone prosper.”
However, the fact is that, despite Israel’s security measures, Palestinian Arabs are still better off than many of their neighbors, per the UN’s own Human Development Index (HDI).
HDI is a comparative measure of life expectancy, literacy, education and standards of living for countries worldwide, and is used to measure each nation’s quality of life.
The Palestinian Authority HDI rank is 97, right in the middle of the 193 countries in the world – ahead of Egypt, and well ahead of other Middle East nations such as Syria and Morocco – and is even, surprisingly, significantly higher than non-Middle East countries such as South Africa and India.
Moreover, even the UN Report cited by Glennie shows quite clearly that real GDP (Gross Domestic Product) in the Palestinian Authority has increased dramatically over the last several years, and is now above pre-Intifada levels:
Characteristically, Glennie completely omits any hint that Palestinians have some responsibility for their plight: No mention of the Palestinian Authority’s notorious and well-documented corruption and lack of transparency, their culture which promotes anti-Semitism, terrorism and intransigence (including PA payments to families of terrorists), and the absence of basic democratic checks and balances.
Glennie concludes thusly:
While donors [to the PA] showcase their increasing generosity to Palestine in their annual reports, that generosity appears more than ever to be a function of their inaction in the face of. Aid, as so often, is a sop for political failure.
Yes, Palestinian cultural, moral and political failures continue to create the biggest obstacle to economic and social progress.
No amount of international aid – nor a unilateral declaration of statehood – will ameliorate such endemic and institutional political pathologies.
Related articles
- Neighborhood bully? The Guardian’s selective moral outrage (cifwatch.com)
- What the Guardian won’t report: Selling land to Jews punishable by death in Palestinian territories (cifwatch.com)
- Guardian issues ‘progressive in good standing’ card to Carlos Latuff: racist and anti-Semite (cifwatch.com)
- How the Guardian downplays terrorist attack on innocent Israelis (cifwatch.com)
- Harriet Sherwood’s truncated history of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (cifwatch.com)
- UK Dep’t for International Development or Palestinian Solidarity Campaign? (cifwatch.com)
- Jews build homes in Israel: Harriet Sherwood and the political orthodoxy of the Guardian Left (cifwatch.com)
- Some reflections on CiF Watch’s 2nd Anniversary, and a few questions to our loyal readers (cifwatch.com)
- Yvonne Ridley, Palestinian terrorist attacks, and peanut allergies (cifwatch.com)
- Peace: Harriet Sherwood’s Palestinian Caricature (cifwatch.com)
- What Harriet Sherwood won’t report: PA kindergarten students sing “Martyrdom for kids” (cifwatch.com)
- The Israeli humanity, and terrorist malice, which Harriet Sherwood will never report (cifwatch.com)







5 comments
Comments feed for this article
August 25, 2011 at 8:28 am
Another Joshua
The Guardian continues with its “drip-drip” brainwashing to foment hatred against the only democratic country in the whole of the middle east. This time its by airbrushing vital facts to prevent the unaware reader to form the view it propogates and is a distortion of truth.
The conclusions reached by researchers who undertook a 6 month enquiry into Guardian Israel/Palestine opinion will come as no surprise to CIF Watchers;
http://justjournalism.com/special-reports/voices-from-the-conflict-israeli-and-palestinian-op-eds-in-the-guardian/
August 25, 2011 at 8:41 am
pretzelberg
But self-styled “Just Journalism” are themselves biased.
August 25, 2011 at 8:55 am
zeitgoose
What are your grounds?
August 25, 2011 at 10:17 am
Another Joshua
Pretzelberg, before commenting read what is written. Simply launching into an accusation without considering the merits of the research does not really give one much to comment back on. Also the piece I provided the link for refers you to a link to download the report it is talking about so that anyone can form their own view.
I cannot agree with you that Just Journalism is being biased , other than to say that it is selective in singling out bad reporting ,whether it is to do with Israel or not, though it covers Israel quite a lot, partly because that is where a lot of bad reporting is carried out. Of course, no one is perfect, but at least Just Journalism applies objectivity and integrity, unlike some of the “self-styled” journalists who often come under its scrutiny.
I know you sometimes criticise the Guardian, and your heart is sometimes in the right place , but my patience is tried by you in trying to understand why you also so often try to defend the indefensible?
…..and it wasn’t me who gave you the one star!
August 25, 2011 at 5:42 pm
pretzelberg
I find that – like this website – while JJ have genuine and indeed noble aims, sometimes things tip towards pro-Israel bias. Nowt wrong with that, of, course – but I think they should get a new name.
JJ seem to comprise a nice enough bunch of people, let me stress.