“it’s a terrible historical problem that modern Israel came into existence.” – Tony Kushner
Kushner is a celebrated author and playwright who recently received an honorary doctorate from City University of New York (CUNY).
He has become a Guardian cause celeb largely due to the row over his honorary degree – a controversy based largely on his explicit statements that Israel should never have been born, support for BDS, and vilification of pro-Israel Jews.
The latest gushing profile of Kushner by Guardian Theater critic, Michael Billington, (Tony Kushner: ‘At first I was horrified‘, Guardian, Aug. 15) brings to nine the number of stories or commentaries about the ultimately unsuccessful efforts by Jeffrey Wiesenfeld, among others, at CUNY to prevent Kushner from receiving the honorary degree.
The subheading of Billington’s piece perfectly sums up the continual misrepresentation of Kushner’s critics:
“When Tony Kushner’s honorary degree was vetoed over allegations that he was anti-Israel, there was an outcry. Here he talks for the first time about the controversy“. [emphasis mine]
And, Kushner himself, in the interview, suggests that his critics’ accusations against him are lies which reek of “McCarthyism”.
The fact is, however, that this remark, like others he’s made before, again shows that Kushner continues to lie about his well-documented record of furious anti-Zionism.
They include several comments, in writings and in interviews, where Kushner clearly, and without qualification, expressed his view that Israel’s creation was a “mistake”, and that it should never have come into existence.
Indeed, Kushner has made it clear that he is “not a Zionist”.
He has also suggested that Israel is committing something akin to cultural genocide, accusing it of engaging in “a deliberate destruction of Palestinian culture and a systematic attempt to destroy the identity of the Palestinian people”, and clearly stated that Palestinian suicide bombing is not nearly as morally reprehensible in his view as IDF counter terrorism operations. Kushner also described Israel’s very creation as an act of “ethnic cleansing”, and has accused the state of engaging in “savagery” and “barbarism”.
He also has leveled quite vicious invectives against Jewish Zionists, once describing them as some of “the most repulsive members of the Jewish community”.
Kushner, during his interview with the Guardian’s Billington, denied that he favors a boycott against Israel, yet, as CAMERA pointed out:
“Kushner sits on the Board of Advisors of the “Jewish Voice for Peace” which advocates divestment and boycott campaigns against Israel. His name appears on JVP letterhead, including on a letter “salut[ing]” the Presbyterian Church (PCUSA) for its move toward divesting from companies that do business with Israel.” [Also, see here]
In the spirit of Kushner’s continuing misrepresentation about his rhetorical assault on Israel’s legitimacy, and demonization of its Jewish supporters, his most recent denial that he doesn’t support boycotts against the Jewish state is but another a blatant lie - one in a series of falsehoods which the Guardian could have easily have uncovered.
Instead, Michael Billington, as with his fellow colleagues at the Guardian since the row at CUNY, insists upon sympathetically portraying the playwright in a manner generally reserved for anti-Zionist Jews who face critical scrutiny: an immutable victim of a smear campaign by Zionists.
That the Guardian continues to champion his “cause” is certainly no surprise, but you’d think that one reporter from a mainstream news outlet would do a little fact-checking and hold Kushner accountable to his smears and defamations against the Jewish state.






5 comments
Comments feed for this article
August 16, 2011 at 12:57 pm
Hoi Polloi
Posted on February 11, 2011:
Billington’s anti-Semitic Blood Libel
Michael Billington on Caryl Churchill’s play, Seven Jewish Children:
“What she captures, in remarkably condensed poetic form, is the transition that has overtaken Israel, to the point where security has become the pretext for indiscriminate slaughter.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2009/feb/11/seven-jewish-children
Billington Endorses the Mass-Murder of Jews
About “My Name is Rachel Corrie”, Billington writes:
“Theatre has no obligation to give a complete picture. Its only duty is to be honest. And what you get here is a stunning account of one woman’s passionate response to a particular situation. And the passion comes blazing through in Corrie’s eloquent reaction to her father’s inquiry about Palestinian violence. As she says, if we lived where tanks and soldiers and bulldozers could destroy our homes at any moment and where our lives were completely strangled, wouldn’t we defend ourselves as best we could. The danger of right-on propaganda is avoided by the specificity of Rickman’s Theatre Upstairs production.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2005/apr/14/theatre.politicaltheatre
Melanie Phillips responds to that last piece as follows:
“For a moment, I thought Billington was saying that if we lived in a situation where terrorists could blow children and teenagers to bits in pizza parlours and on buses we would of course defend ourselves as best we could. Silly me; he’s endorsing the side of the killers, of course. Thank heavens he‘s avoided the dangers of ‘right-on propaganda’.”
http://www.melaniephillips.com/diary/archives/001138.html
Howard Jacobson on Billington’s review of Seven Jewish Children (see post above for link):
“If one could simply leave them to it one would. It’s a hell of its own making, hating Jews for a living. Only think of the company you must keep. But these things are catching. Take Michael Billington’s somnolent review of the play in the Guardian. I would imagine that any accusation of anti-Semitism would horrify Michael Billington. And I certainly don’t make it. But if you wanted an example of how language itself can sleepwalk the most innocent towards racism, then here it is. “Churchill shows us,” he writes, “how Jewish children are bred to believe in the ‘otherness’ of Palestinians…”
It is not just the adopted elision of Israeli children into Jewish children that is alarming, or the unquestioning acceptance of Caryl Churchill’s offered insider knowledge of Israeli child-rearing, what’s most chilling is that lazy use of the word “bred”, so rich in eugenic and bestial connotations, but inadvertently slipped back into the conversation now, as truth. Fact: Jews breed children in order to deny Palestinians their humanity. Watching another play in the same week, Billington complains about its manipulation of racial stereotypes. He doesn’t, you see, even notice the inconsistency.
And so it happens. Without one’s being aware of it, it happens. A gradual habituation to the language of loathing. Passed from the culpable to the unwary and back again. And soon, before you know it…”
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/howard-jacobson/howard-jacobson-let8217s-see-the-8216criticism8217-of-israel-for-what-it-really-is-1624827.html
August 16, 2011 at 1:58 pm
Thank God I'm An Infidel
GREAT article by Howard Jacobson!
August 16, 2011 at 2:01 pm
Adam Levick
Great catch on Billington’s review of Seven Jewish Children. When you hate Israel with a passion it makes perfect sense that you’d also fawn over Tony Kushner.
August 16, 2011 at 2:32 pm
Hoi Polloi
I rather like Oliver Kamm’s dig at Billington:
“Of the initial staging of Don Giovanni, the critic Michael Billington — who, on this evidence, will believe anything…”
http://oliverkamm.typepad.com/blog/2004/09/the_eno_vanishe.html
—————————
Oliver Kamm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Kamm
Oliver Kamm on Chomsky
http://tinyurl.com/3m4r4ju
And his mother is a superb translator
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthea_Bell
—————–
Brought to you by the Oliver Kamm Appreciation Society
August 17, 2011 at 2:20 am
Another Joshua
When the likes of Kushner make a statement like the one quoted (““it’s a terrible historical problem that modern Israel came into existence.”), my immediate reaction is to apply reverse logic with such people. Who? What? Why? Where,?How ? And which “historical problem” created the historic problem they speak of?
Then wait sit back for BS answer, which is so full of guff, grandiosity and plain stupidity. Er the capitalists, the Zionists. Er about the time of the Spanish inquisition or whatever is in their vacuous heads.It looks like such people are much more like a pre-historic problem to me!