“When Marxist dictators shoot their way into power in Central America, the San Francisco Democrats don’t blame the guerrillas and their Soviet allies. They blame United States policies of one hundred years ago. But then they always blame America first.” - Jean Kirkpatrick, former U.S. Ambassador to the UN under Ronald Reagan
The Guardian Left’s propensity to blame the U.S. and Great Britain first – while avoiding expressing such opprobrium for brutal dictators or Islamist terrorists – is truly legion, and was on full display in CiF columnist William Dalrymple’s piece on Nov. 12 entitled “Iraq’s disappearing Christians are Bush and Blair’s legacy.”
He begins:
“When George W Bush sent the US into Iraq in 2003, he believed he would be replacing Saddam Hussein with a peaceful, pro-American Arab democracy that would naturally look to the Christian west for support. In reality, seven years on, it appears that he has instead created a highly radicalised pro-Iranian sectarian killing field, where most of the Iraqi Christian minority has been forced to flee abroad.”
So, George Bush “created” a highly radicalized pro-Iranian…[Christian] killing field.” Of course, the Islamist terrorists who, you know, actually engaged in the killing seem to bear no responsibility for the brutal murders they committed.
Dalrymple continues:
“Before Bush senior took on Saddam for the first time in 1991, there were more than a million Christians in Iraq. They made up just under 10% of the population, and were a prosperous and prominent minority…Of the 800,000 Christians still in Iraq when Dubya unleashed the US army on Saddam for the second time, two-thirds have fled the country.”
At this point I’m not sure if Mr. Dalrymple is a troll – deployed secretly by conservatives in the UK to discredit the left by advancing arguments which seem to long for the days of the Butcher of Baghdad. (See my post about the “glory days” of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq here)
A CiF commenter summed up Dalrymple’s descent into post-colonial lunacy, and liberal racism, best:
Treat the Arab world like adults? My guess is that Mr. Dalrymple never thought of such a crazy idea.






4 comments
Comments feed for this article
November 16, 2010 at 4:59 pm
logdon
‘Treat the Arab world like adults?’
Unfortunately they are infantilised to begin with. The kneejerk riots. The me, me childish demands. Massive illiteracy rates. Swathed and coddled in a supremacist religion which like a surrogate overbearing parent controls all aspects of life.
However our inability to accept this leads us into yet more of the molicoddling and platitudinous attitude thus completing the circle.
Imagine Lord of the Flies with AK47′s and Semtex belts and you’re getting near it.
November 17, 2010 at 1:34 am
Wilhemina Bothwell
I have met William Darymple and am not surprised at his incredible distortions. Brutality is the weak mans imitation of strength and their admirers are without emtional intelligence to perceive that.
November 17, 2010 at 2:58 am
JerusalemMite
Treat the Arab world like adults? My guess is that Mr. Dalrymple never thought of such a crazy idea.
Yes. There is a definite mind block in the type in some of the people who write for CiF. Almost as though they are living in some divergent time stream. The very idea of relating to Muslims as a general group of people who are very prone to making very bad decisions is quite beyond their limited possible contemplations. And that they should ever actually be responsible for their bad decisioned is …. unthinkable in the extreme.
For them.
It is a sickness.
November 17, 2010 at 4:44 am
Derek Pasquill
Guardian writers are bonkers. Totally.
Possibly because being on the left makes you so.