So now we have the latest take on the Midde East impasse in the print version of the Guardian, as well as on CiF, by Chris Patten, one time conservative cabinet minister, and EU commissioner.
Just to remind ourselves who Crass, oops, Chris Patten is :–
This piece, as noted by below the line commenter, TiredOldDog, can be summarised in a short sentence, “To assure world peace, the EU must make Israel surrender”.
Patten talks about the “morally appalling and politically self-defeating policy of Israel” etc etc.
As Patten is someone whose opinions carry weight in the corridors of power, I would draw his attention to the recent sequence of events which have brought us to where we are today. Let me clarify the situation for Chris Patten.
Israel unilaterally and unconditionally withdrew from Gaza in 2005, even disinterring Jewish dead from the cemetery there. All Israel asked for in return is to be left alone. Israel leaves behind infrastructure, such as homes etc, and in particular a lucrative greenhouse industry, paid for by generous US Jewish donors. These were trashed within days of the withdrawal. The withdrawal was greeted not by the Palestinians building up their infrastructure, but by terrorising Israeli civiians by raining down thousands of rockets on them, sent from Gaza. Meanwhile Israel continues to treat injured Gazans for free, evacuating them across the border to Israeli hospitals, including treating terrorists.
In 2007 Hamas takes control of Gaza in a brutal coup against the PA, in what is euphemistically described as a democratic election, in reality by threatening and terrorising those with whom they disagree with violence. Hamas controls all the hundreds of millions of dollars received in aid, as well as impounding many of the aid deliveries. Israel, meanwhile, allows across its border thousands of tons of suppies daily, including supplying Gaza with electricity, fuel etc. Gaza, meanwhile, is blockaded at Rafah on the Egyptian border.
Eventually, after years of escalating rocket and mortar attacks against Israel , ignored by the international community, Israel launches Operation Cast Lead, 2009.
During it, Hamas broke all the laws of warfare, both by targeting civilians and by using Gazans as human shields, as well as fighting often in civilian dress.
Indeed, Colonel Richard Kemp, who was British Commander of troops in Afghanistan in 2003, and senior advisor to British Intelligence said of the IDF —”the Israeli Defence Forces did more to safeguard the rights of civilians in a combat zone than any other army in the history of warfare”.
Compounded with all that, Hamas in common with the PA, and Jordan and Egypt, poisons young childrens’ minds in schools by daily pumping out hate against Jews, and against the Jewish state. Hamas even runs training summer camps in the holidays for young children, training them with guns and dressing them up as suicide bombers. Hamas declares in its Charter that its goal is the elimination of the Jewish state.
So, Mr. Patten, what don’t you understand?
Considering that Europe, far from showing courage in saving European Jewry 70 years ago, colluded in its destruction, you now are asking for it to “show courage” to destroy the only Jewish state.
Why don’t YOU show courage and demand that Hamas follows the norms of civilised behaviour, including allowing the Red Cross access to Gilad Shallit.
But that’s too hard—- much easier to constantly lay the blame at Israel’s door.
For some of the commenters, Patten did not go far enough in his condemnation of Israel, and here we have a sample of the usual hatemongers on CiF:-
I give the last word in Israel’s defence to Pulcinella:-









57 comments
Comments feed for this article
June 18, 2010 at 10:28 am
ItsikDeWembley
FAIRPLAY: “…unless we devise a plan of action.”
Very well said.
Hence my reason to try and engage Berchmans (however futile this may seem) in getting a vision, if you call it, of what our opponants might call the “solution” to the I/P conflict – aka the israeli / arab conflict.
Any ideas might be welcome so long they are constructive and don’t include an extension to Nazi or facist ideologies.
June 18, 2010 at 10:36 am
ItsikDeWembley
Silke,
“sadly we have managed to destroy the hope von Fallersleben meant to express in that line so thoroughly that I want to hope that he himself would have been the first to praise your father.”
I know it is very off topic but if I am not wrong one of the reasons Jews migrated in numbers to Germany in the 19 century was it’s Liberal attitude and fairness, unlike Russia.
The Austro hungary were similar in their attitude round that time – a fact they mention when visiting the old Jewish quarter of Prague.
Amazing what propaganda and public pressure can do in the right atmosphere.
You know, in financial crisis, etc…
Isn’t the UK in a financial crisis?
June 18, 2010 at 10:41 am
smtx01
whats this thread about again?
June 18, 2010 at 11:06 am
Silke
Itsik
I once heard somewhere that Freiherr vom Stein who I think liberated peasants from serfdom in Prussia needed as a consequence of his reforms people who were literate and the only community where he could find them in sufficient numbers were the Jews
I’ve never checked up on the story and thus don’t know how substantial the change initiated by that was on the longer run but I cherish it because it illuminates the quirks of history for me
my Miss Marple-ish way of thinking has found all too often this to be true:
if you are discriminated against cultivate an arcane excellence and wait for your chance or shorter: you only stand a chance out of it if you get a chance to prove that you are useful.
(sadly Jews put that wisdom to excessive length when they got themselves killed in disproportionate numbers in WW1 wanting to disprove the claim that Jews are not fit to be soldiers – especially sad about it is that when the Nazis got their say it made no difference if they had been decorated for bravery or not)
June 18, 2010 at 11:14 am
ItsikDeWembley
Silke
“especially sad about it is that when the Nazis got their say it made no difference if they had been decorated for bravery or not)”
I heard the Otto Frank (Anne’s father) was told he would have been spared had he obeyed the orders since he served in WW1.
Not sure how true that was but I have great doubt that even if it is true the Nazis would have kept their word had things ended up differently.
June 18, 2010 at 12:51 pm
Silke
“I have great doubt that even if it is true the Nazis would have kept their word”
keeping their word? never …
- people lusting for murder for murder’s sake never do, all they do is lure people into “nothing will be eaten as hot as it has been cooked” complacency. (nix wird so heiß gegessen, wie’s gekocht wird)
contrary to how folk wisdom has it life under dictatorship doesn’t mean life in law and order – after all why would anybody want to be a dictator if he/she weren’t free to change things satisfying any desire that may take his/her fancy.
June 19, 2010 at 2:10 am
Irit
Silke,
Including my great-uncle Sigismund, the beloved eldest son of his family, who died on the Western Front in April 1918.