Back in September of last year, we ran a piece about how Guardian Middle East Editor Brian Whitaker has come to the defense of Human Rights Watch when a poster mentioned their efforts at raising money from Saudi Arabia by emphasizing the organization’s critical positions on Israel.
Brian sprung to action by entering the thread defending against the attempted “smear” of HRW. Needless to say, he was proven wrong.
What has since emerged though is that we at CiF Watch may have been wrong also. Not about the Saudis, HRW or Whitaker but about Mark Garlasco. The Nazi memorabilia collecting military expert at the employ of HRW at the time. It turns out Mark is a collector of army memorabilia from a few nations along with Germany and it also seems that despite his fetish of having iron crosses on his T shirts, he was among the few actual defenders of the Jewish state’s military actions due to his military background himself and general familiarity with the Middle East and its complexities. 
We stand corrected.
- Still, Mark, the Iron Cross T Shirt wasn’t the best wardrobe choice.
Of course having satisfaction at seeing Mark as the strongest defender of Israel at HRW is still a big pill to swallow. So for water lets read this next piece by Benjamin Birnbaum in the New Republic published yesterday, titled Minority Report Human Rights Watch fights a civil war over Israel.
Please read the whole thing as it not only sheds light on the increasing anti-Israel and anti-war (of any kind) bias of the organization but tells us about how some members of this organization, up to its founder and former chairman, have found themselves in a climate so biased against Israel that only through airing these dirty sheets in public would they have any chance at redressing them. A decision not taken lightly by any institution these days. The piece navigates the reader through the famous road marks of Goldstone, Gaza, phosphorous and Hamas tactics with the occasional view of the “Right of return” and other goodies guaranteed to satisfy any reader familiar with the Israel-Palestinian conflict and familiar with the workings of institutions built on noble callings only to become servants of the self righteous.





11 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 28, 2010 at 11:41 pm
Hawkeye
Alchemist:
Noah Pollak has a piece up at Commentary Magazine on the response of HRW to the TNR article.
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/pollak/286186
April 29, 2010 at 12:59 am
JerusalemMite
Alchemist. I read the whole Minority Report – Human Rights Watch fights a civil war over Israel.
Very interesting.
Does give a picture of how organisations are taken over by extreme left denizens of darkness followed by their islamist allies.
A truly shocking situation.
The mind set of people working in the HRW is virulently anti Israel and Pro Palestinian. They are like The Guardian. ‘Fair and Balanced’.
My arse.
April 29, 2010 at 2:01 am
spoton
The Guardian,HRW are neither fair nor balanced.
In fact they are pimping for the palestinians.
April 29, 2010 at 4:35 am
JerusalemMite
spoton
The Guardian,HRW are neither fair nor balanced.
Porgina has stated in a letter to the Jewish Chronicle that The Guardian/CiF is ‘fair and balanced’.
Surely you are not suggesting that she is/was lying?
April 29, 2010 at 5:02 am
FoolMeOnce
The Alchemist
When did Mark Garlasco defend Israel’s operation in Gaza? Do you have a link to anything? I’m asking because I vaguely recall him actually being in the group of people that attacked Israel for using aerial drones for assault purposes, and who claimed these drones had such a high detection and visual capability that any assault they unintentionally made on civilians must had been intentional. (A false claim that highly overestimates the video capabilities, but I digress)
Am I mistaken that he said these things? Maybe it was someone else?
About the Nazi memorabilia- it was speculated from the start he collects all kinds of army memorabilia, but I’m not sure a leather jacket worn by an SS member, as he tried to purchase with excitement. “That is so cool! The leather SS jacket makes my blood go cold it is so COOL!”” puts anyone at ease.
http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2009/09/mark-garlasco-of-human-right-watch.html
A closet Nazi or just a strange, tactless, guy? Maybe the latter.
April 29, 2010 at 6:04 am
Serendipity
Let’s face it, Garlasco shot all his credibility (or at least what there was of it) by the failure of his “expertise” about the Gaza beach incident, when he did the equivalent of the verbal hokey kokey about whether Israel was or was not responsible.
However, given the content of Medusa’s article here, it’s entirely possible, if not probable, that the media embroidered what he said.
Still, as Alchemist has written, sporting an Iron Cross sweatshirt is not the best decision for someone who should at least appear to be impartial.
April 29, 2010 at 6:30 am
Ariadne
I hope Noak Pollak is correct and I might judge that by what the BBC repeats from HRW. If nothing, what success that will be.
April 29, 2010 at 1:05 pm
The Alchemist
Foolmeonce
I wasn’t saying Garlasco defended Israel in Gaza. What the article said was that among the staff of HRW, he was the one who would defend Israeli military actions within a military context on the ground. In other words not jumping to war crime accusations but instead explaining IDF actions from a military point of view.
The Nazi memorabilia is of course creepy. Again, the article explains that he had a fascination with those due to his grand dad having been drafted into the wermacht and that he collected WWII trinkets from all sides.
So I guess he is no Nazi just an army/military buff.
I also make the point that this guy was Israels defender in that team and that didn’t really create comfort but also showed how far out the rest of HRW was if he was the “defender”.
April 29, 2010 at 3:47 pm
Ariadne
Oh, sorry, typo! Noah.
April 29, 2010 at 5:04 pm
Ariadne
Steinberg on the same matters.
April 29, 2010 at 5:53 pm
Andy Gill
At last organizations like HRW and Amnesty are coming under scrutiny. For too long they have been accorded saint-like status, and they have come to believe that they really are morally superior to the rest of us.
But as the Bernstein and Gita Saghal cases demonstrate, Amnesty and HRW are run by self-righteous hypocrites, blind to their repressed bigotry and wallowing in the slime of their self-accredited virtue.
The gradual unravelling of these cancerous cabals as their dirty little secrets are exposed will be a delight to behold.