Just Journalism recently published an in-depth report on the anti-Israel bias found in the Financial Times based on an analysis of 121 Middle East editorials in 2009. To complement this report, Robin Shepherd has a post on his excellent blog highlighting the type of phenomenon that we encounter day in day out in CiF – “below the line” antisemitism – which in the particular instance reported on by Shepherd, was triggered by a rare pro-Israel article in the Financial Times by Andrew Roberts.
As Shepherd observes:
One consequence of traditional media’s move to online platforms is that the threads which follow many articles are now open to readers to make comments of their own. This not only provides an insight into the kind of people who are attracted to a given article, it also places a responsibility on newspapers to police their websites in order to prevent libellous, bigoted or racist opinions from becoming associated with them.
Few issues reveal the nature of the problem more starkly than the Israel-Palestine conflict where extreme hostility to the Jewish state now masquerades as “normal” commentary in much of the British media. It is hardly surprising, therefore, that fanatics and open anti-Semites feel they have licence to let rip.
In CiF Watch style, Shepherd goes on to cite eight examples of the type of comments posted in the Roberts thread which you can read by clicking here. CiF Watch regulars will immediately notice the similarity in the nature of the discourse which Shepherd describes as “some of the vilest anti-Semitic bigotry to have been sanctioned by a British newspaper for quite some time”.
We have in the past demonstrated the growing convergence of antisemitic commentary between the far left and mainstream left on the one hand and far-right on the other which use the same type of language in substance to convey their message of hatred in the context of Israel. What is interesting to note from Shepherd’s post is the extent to which this kind of discourse has been mainstreamed in a leading right-wing British broadsheet pointing towards a worrying trend that antisemitic discourse has penetrated the fringes of both the left and right into the mainstream.
Even if one concedes that the readers that post comments in the online versions of the British broadsheets are not a representative sample of their readership, it does beg the question to what extent do the views expressed by these readers really represent the prejudice of a much broader cross-section of British society, who if freed of constraints of political correctness would if given the chance “let rip”. With the cross-fertilization of anti-Israel and anti-Jewish bigotry becoming a regular feature of the mainstream British media and political landscape one really has to wonder.






32 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 6, 2010 at 10:21 am
Jonathan Hoffman
Here is a letter I wrote to the FT recently, needless to say they did not publish it:
David Gardner (February 26th) writes of Israel as a ‘rogue state’ because of Mossad’s (presumed) assassination of a terrorist leader responsible for arms smuggling into Gaza. If Osama Bin Laden had been the victim and US or UK special forces the perpetrator, would he call those countries ‘rogue states’? I think not. And to cite the Goldstone Report in his support is thoroughly disingenuous. As Abba Eban (former Foreign Minister of Israel, died 2002) said: “If Algeria introduced a UN resolution declaring that the earth was flat and that Israel had flattened it, it would pass by a vote of 164 to 13 with 26 abstentions.”
March 6, 2010 at 10:30 am
Jonathan Hoffman
I wonder if it is significant that like The Guardian, the FT is losing money.
Like The Guardian, they will find out that far from being a profitable strategy, hosting antisemites drives advertisers away….
March 6, 2010 at 10:36 am
Richard Tebboth
Must any criticism of the state of Israel be labelled “antisemitic”?
March 6, 2010 at 10:37 am
Richard Tebboth
PS On this criterion most of the Jews I know are antisemitic.
March 6, 2010 at 10:51 am
iva
@RT
Looking through your blog and noticing your book list says all about you
March 6, 2010 at 11:13 am
Abandon hope
“The world’s greatest genocide attempt is being perpetrated on TV and no ones does anything about it. Gaza has become history’s largest concentration camp.” ( Financial Times)
On the one hand this is hyperbolic, counter- productive drivel..on the other it its in the FT. Not the Guardian. This would not have lasted a minute on CIF.
March 6, 2010 at 11:26 am
Abtalyon
Richard Tebboth:
As you refer to Israel and the Palestinian territories as Canaan, do you also talk about the UK as Britannia and Scotland as the land of the Picts and Scots?
March 6, 2010 at 11:38 am
Grumpy
It is a pity that those who wrote those hate-filled angry comments did not read the article that occasioned them with more attention since they would find that they were mentioned as part of a class. Andrew Roberts says:
“The reason that such double standards still apply – more than six decades after the foundation of the state of Israel – is not because of the nature of that doughty, brave, embattled, tiny, surrounded, yet proudly defiant country, but because of the nature of its foes. Even though one has to be in one’s seventies to remember a time when Israel didn’t exist, nevertheless there are still those who call the country’s legitimacy into question, employing anything that happens to be in the news at the time – such as this latest assassination – to try to argue that Israel is not a real country, and therefore doesn’t really deserve to exist. Real rogue states such as North Korea might be loathed and criticised, but even they do not have their very legitimacy as a state called into question because of their actions.”
How does Israel differ from rogue states and other states established by a similar agency at about the same time and in the same region? The only characteristic that Israel has that distinguishes no other state is that it is Jewish.
The reason could be intellectual laziness: Israel is the target of the media and so is a natural for the disaffected.Find me something unique about Israel besides its Jewishness that attracts all this vileness and I will agree that the cause is not antisemitism.
March 6, 2010 at 1:00 pm
Richard Tebboth
Canaan: well that was the name of the “promised land” – the land promised to Abraham and his descendants.
My understanding of history is that Jews descend from two of Jacob’s twelve sons; where are the rest?
March 6, 2010 at 1:07 pm
Richard Tebboth
Britannia: no hang-ups particularly in the context of history – the name assigned by the Romans post invasion; presumably the feuding tribes inhabiting the area prior to this had only regional names.
Similarly Caledonia and Cymru.
March 6, 2010 at 1:12 pm
Biodegradable
where are the rest?
Here’s one!
{raises hand}
March 6, 2010 at 1:40 pm
Pilpul
Wonderful to know that you have read our scriptures so seriously Richard Tebboth. I’m sure that you will be able to answer my little question in depth.
What did you think of the Judge Ehud? What comments do you have on the physical make-up of his opponent.
March 6, 2010 at 2:21 pm
TomWonacott
Excellent article Hawkeye
I’m glad to see that we are branching out into other media outlets besides the Guardian. While the Guardian might be the worst offender (especially above the line), there are many other media sources that are promoting a biased view of the IP conflict – and not just in the UK. Polls conducted in Europe show that the media and academia (and political organizations) have a profound influence on perceptions of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and generally in a negative fashion for Israel. The media is very influential.
Recently, the Washington Post ran an article by Richard Cohen titled ”Israel has its faults, but apartheid isn’t one of them”. The article attracted some of the worst antisemitic comments posted by neo leftist and right wingers. Unfortunately, the US has a growing population of vocal anti Israel posters – an alliance of the left and right – that are a part of the IP discourse in North America as well. Their numbers, however, are much smaller and Israel still enjoys a great deal of support in the US. The more important point, however, is that the support for Israel is under a vocal attack by the far left in America as well. Perceptions can change.
Based on recent polls, its fair to say that the anti Jewish discourse has indeed penetrated the mainstream – at least in Europe.
March 6, 2010 at 3:45 pm
Richard Tebboth
Dear Pilpul
I hoped the “our” was inclusive of both the “Old” and the “New” Testaments
However, given your nom-de-net as defined by Wilipedia I suspect not.
“Pilpul (Hebrew: פלפול, loosely meaning “sharp analysis”) refers to a method of studying the Talmud through intense textual analysis in attempts to either explain conceptual differences between various halakhic rulings or to reconcile any apparent contradictions presented from various readings of different texts. Pilpul has escaped into English as acolloquialism used by some to indicate extreme disputation or casuistic hairsplitting. This usage has especially fallen into use among critics of Haredi Jews, impugning their Talmud study as non-productive.”
I had to look up this passage in Judges – it had escaped me as part of my Sunday School studies.
I wonder what response you expect…
I do note that this incident occurred prior to the Babylonian exile.
Presumably Moabite DNA was incorporated into that of the 12 tribes together with any tendency to obesity.
March 6, 2010 at 3:52 pm
Richard Tebboth
PS I am not routinely a Guardian reader; but daily Arutz and Haaretz.
Not to mention the Daily Telegraph.
March 6, 2010 at 3:57 pm
Margie
I’ve just been listening to the Daniel Pearl Memorial Lecture, given by that remarkable gentleman, Christopher Hitchens, who concluded the question and answer session after the lecture with a statements that
Antisemitism is not the sign that something bad is going to happen to the Jews. It is a sign that something bad is going to happen to that society
and that
antisemitism is the common enemy of civilisation
March 6, 2010 at 6:08 pm
Richard Tebboth
BTW wrt to DNA see:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/8550614.stm
March 6, 2010 at 8:43 pm
AKUS
CiFWatch recently ran an article on the attempts to deligitimize Israel.
Following link this poster, Richard Tebboth, who seems to be setting a new and higher bar for extreme anti-Semitism and deligitimzation of Israel, has embedded in his name, here is his reading list.
Canaan
Avraham Burg: The holocaust is over, we must rise from its ashes
Jimmy Carter: Palestine peace not apartheid
Ben White: Israeli Apartheid
Uri Davis: Israel: An Apartheid State
Uri Davis: Apartheid Israel: Possibilities for the Struggle Within
Note the total lack of any material that might oppose his prejudices and provide any balance to his views. A reading list compiled of some of the worst Israel-haters we have seen in the last decade or so.
Add that to his ignorance about the number of sons that Jacob had, and therefor the tribes of Israel, and we have in front of us a stunning portrait of the sort of people that are commenting on threads in places like CiF and, apparently, now at the FT.
March 7, 2010 at 2:13 am
JerusalemMite
AKUS
CiFWatch recently ran an article on the attempts to deligitimize Israel. Following link this poster, Richard Tebboth, who seems to be setting a new and higher bar for extreme anti-Semitism and deligitimzation of Israel, has embedded in his name, here is his reading list.
Yes. It’s strange.
I wonder who he is on Ci(F)? I don’t for a moment believe him when he says that he doesn’t ‘frequent’ there. Ci(F) is, after all, tailor made for his kind of perversion.
March 7, 2010 at 3:13 am
Abandon hope
AKUS
” some of the worst Israel-haters we have seen in the last decade or so. ”
Having read this blog for a while… the words “Israel hater” no longer strike me as odd the way they used to. It is an attempt to give people the coat of an emotionally directed mono thinkers and I would have thought you might squirm a little when you use such a term.
I have mentioned before that the Guardian does not give enough space to Brit violence as compared to Israeli violence and I would like to mention CIFWatch occasionally in my attacks on this …without having folk snigger.
March 7, 2010 at 3:25 am
Germolene
Akus
There are many of those obsessed quasi-scholars who believe that the translation into English of our sources is more authoritative than the original and holds the key to all sorts of mysteries which Jews don’t quite grasp.
This is just another of these unremarkable little nuisances.
March 7, 2010 at 12:49 pm
Richard Tebboth
From AKUS
“Following link this poster, Richard Tebboth, who seems to be setting a new and higher bar for extreme anti-Semitism”
You are conflating criticism of Israel with anti-semitism.
If there are errors of fact in my posts I would welcome correction.
Reading list additions also welcome,
My identity is no secret – no nom de blog here.
March 7, 2010 at 12:57 pm
Richard Tebboth
PS LSE tomorrow – Monday 8/2/09
I will be there should others want to meet up thereafter for jaw, jaw.
07816 853259
The Brahimi Panels: The Goldstone Report and the Peace Process
LSE Global Governance public discussion
Date: Monday 8 March 2010
Time: 6.30-8pm
Venue: LSE campus, venue confirmed to ticketholders
Speaker: Ami Ayalon, Professor Christine Chinkin, Karma Nabulsi, Colonel Desmond Travers
Chair: Lakhdar Brahimi
This public discussion, chaired by the distinguished UN diplomat and envoy Lakhdar Brahimi, will discuss the findings of the UN Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict and the ‘Goldstone Report’ that it produced. Panellists will also examine the state of the peace process, and how this might unfold in the future.
Ami Ayalon is a former member of the Knesset for the Labor Party in Israel and a former Minister without Portfolio. He was previously head of Shin Bet, Israel’s secret service and head of Israel’s navy.
Christine Chinkin is Professor of International Law at the LSE and a barrister. She is an Overseas Affiliated Faculty Member, University of Michigan and has been a Scholar in Residence for Amnesty International (2005), as well as Visiting Professor at Columbia University (2004) and at the Arts and Humanities Research Centre, Australian National University (2003). She is also a senior research associate at LSE Global Governance and was a member of the UN Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict.
Karma Nabulsi is Fellow in Politics at St Edmund Hall and lectures at the University of Oxford. She is director of the Civitas collective project on civic needs for Palestinian refugees and exiles, and editor of its Register: Palestinians Register: Laying Foundations and Setting Directions. She has also served as a PLO representative working at the United Nations, in Beirut, Tunis, and a representative to the UK.
Desmond Travers is a retired Colonel in the Irish Armed Forces and a member of the Board of Directors of the Institute for International Criminal Investigations (IICI). He also served in command of troops and in key operational appointments with various UN and EU peace support missions in the Middle-East (Cyprus, Lebanon) and in the Former Yugoslavia (Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina). He was also a member of the UN Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict.
Lakhdar Brahimi was foreign minister of Algeria (1991-93) and prior to that ambassador to the UK (1971-79). He mediated the end of the Civil War in Lebanon (1988-91) and headed UN Missions in South Africa, Haiti, Afghanistan and Iraq. Lakhdar Brahimi is now a member of “The Elders”, a group created at the initiative of Nelson Mandela and his wife Graca Machel and chaired by Archbishop Desmond Tutu.
March 7, 2010 at 1:27 pm
Germolene
So RT has learned to cut & paste – well done.
March 7, 2010 at 2:14 pm
Richard Tebboth
Your comments hardly enhance the quality of debate.
An interesting choice of your anonymous nom de net (a further C&P):-
“Germolene is a brand name used on a range of antiseptic products …
Originally a thick antiseptic ointment with a distinctive pink colour, Germolene was reformulated as a cream – and the brand name is used on a range of over-the-counter first aid preparations, most of which contain antiseptic. There is an associated range of products, specifically for the treatment of haemorrhoids.”- Wikipedia
March 7, 2010 at 2:22 pm
Germolene
RT –
If there were no sepsis there would be no need to treat it.
It often identifies itself here.
March 7, 2010 at 8:53 pm
foreverisraeli
If there ever was a nasty hypocrite it would have to be this Archbishop Desmond Tutu,he’s also known as Dr Desmond Tutu, a witch doctor perhaps?……The ugly bugger has it in for Israel.
March 9, 2010 at 7:53 am
John
OT – but of interest…
Cash for content: is the Guardian as pure as it claims to be?>/b>
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/opinion/stephen-glover/stephen-glover-cash-for-content-is-the-guardian-as-pure-as-it-claims-to-be-1917716.html
…..I rang Wendy Miller to seek a response, and she hung up when I told her of my interest. So I sent her an email setting out my concerns which was soon answered by someone called Diane Heath, acting head of PR. In the grandiloquent, slightly offended tones employed by The Guardian whenever its integrity is questioned, she disavowed any impropriety, and referred me to the newspaper’s guidelines which sponsors of its supplements are expected to observe.
………..She offers him a degree of editorial control without any caveat. Is this consonant with the newspaper’s uniquely lofty view of itself? Readers will have to decide for themselves, but I think not. I am also pretty appalled that the Local Government Association, a publicly funded body, was invited to use taxpayers’ money to subsidise Guardian journalism. (It decided not to.) That doesn’t seem right to me.Society Guardian, like other of the newspapers’ supplements, has a near monopoly of public-sector advertisements which the Tories have said they will address if they win the election. Someone should look into the practice of public bodies buying editorial content. Meanwhile if the newspaper should undertake an inquiry into this affair – a favoured tactic when its integrity is impugned – let me predict its unruffled and self-serving conclusion. There is nothing whatsoever to worry about, and The Guardian is always perfect.
Self-serving? Intensely interested in making profits so as to pay the inflated salaries of the pure-minded non-capitalist senior staff – and prepared to get down and dirty to do so? The Guardian? Surely some mistake.
March 9, 2010 at 4:29 pm
Toko LeMoko
Jonathan
“If Algeria introduced a UN resolution declaring that the earth was flat and that Israel had flattened it, it would pass by a vote of 164 to 13 with 26 abstentions.”
A common joke:
A tourist is visiting the zoo. He is sitting with a soft drink, when he sees a little girl leaning into the African lion’s cage. Suddenly, the lion grabs her by the cuff of her jacket and tries to pull her inside to slaughter her, under the eyes of her screaming parents.
The tourist jumps off his seat, runs to the cage and hits the lion square on the nose with a powerful punch. Whimpering from the pain the lion jumps back letting go of the girl, and the tourist takes her to her terrified parents, who thank him endlessly.
A Guardian reporter has watched the whole event. The reporter, addressing the tourist says, “Sir, this was the most gallant and brave thing I saw a man do in my whole life.” The tourist replies, “Why, it was nothing, really, the lion was behind bars. I just saw this little kid in danger, and acted as I felt right.”
The reporter says, “Well, I’ll make sure this won’t go unnoticed. I’m a journalist from the Guardian, you know, and tomorrow’s paper will have this story on the front page… So, what do you do for a living and what political affiliation do you have?’” The tourist replies, “I’m an Israeli officer.”
The journalist leaves. The following morning the tourist buys the Guardian to see if it indeed brings news of his actions, and reads, on front page: ISRAELI OFFICER ASSAULTS AFRICAN IMMIGRANT AND STEALS HIS LUNCH!
March 9, 2010 at 5:00 pm
pretzelberg
foreverisraeli
If there ever was a nasty hypocrite it would have to be this Archbishop Desmond Tutu,he’s also known as Dr Desmond Tutu, a witch doctor perhaps?……The ugly bugger has it in for Israel.
Hey, why not just remoniker yourself “foreverracist” and be done with it?
March 9, 2010 at 6:02 pm
peter1
pretzelberg,
why not just remoniker yourself as “pedanticpretzel” and be done with it?
March 14, 2010 at 11:07 am
Richard Tebboth
Perhaps the progamme on Channel 4 at 20.00 tomorrow will elicit somoe informed and incisive comment on this site.