This is a cross post by Isi Leibler from Candidly Speaking from Jerusalem
The time has come to draw red lines between legitimate criticism and initiatives seeking to demonize Israel.
Richard Goldstone’s infamous role as the token head of the UNHRC report accusing the IDF of war crimes is only one example of prominent Jews who exploit their origins as a way to defame their people. In fact, until recently, Goldstone was considered a respectable Jew, even a Zionist. He was blinded by hubris and ego, and allowed himself to be seduced by the bitterest enemies of his people into providing legitimization for a blood libel against the Jewish state.
Unlike Goldstone, most Jewish renegades were driven by desperation to unburden themselves from what they regarded as their repressive ethnic and cultural roots. Historian Jacob Talmon described such deviant behavior as “a Jewish neurosis” in response to centuries of oppression and pariah status.
The purported commitment of these Jews to universal and humanitarian values was usually belied by extreme attacks on their own people and association with sponsors who were outright anti-Semites.
Streams of such Jews emerged during the 19th century in the wake of emancipation. A classic example was Karl Marx, whose anti-Semitic diatribes were reflected in outbursts like “money is the jealous god of Israel, by the side of which no other god may exist… The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism.”
In czarist Russia, some Jewish social revolutionaries even endorsed pogroms against their own kinsmen, hoping that by venting their frustrations on Jews, the masses would ultimately turn on the czar.
Their successors, the Yevsektsiya, the notorious Jewish section of the Soviet Communist Party, became the most vicious persecutors of their own people, frenziedly suppressing all manifestations of Jewish cultural and religious life. Ultimately they too were liquidated in Stalin’s anti-Semitic campaigns.
Many Jews outside the Soviet Union joined the Communist Party out of a mistaken conviction that it represented the most effective way to combat Nazism. But once in the party, they became brainwashed, and applauded as the evil Soviet regime executed their kinsmen and institutionalized state-sponsored anti-Semitism.
AFTER THE Holocaust and the struggle to create the State of Israel, most Jewish anti-Semites hibernated. As the plight of Soviet Jewry became a rallying call uniting Jews throughout the world, the few remaining Jewish communists were marginalized.
Modern Israel’s first prime minister, David Ben-Gurion, a genuine social democrat, appreciated the dangers posed by left-wing nihilists. He strove strenuously to neutralize the extremists and post-Zionists, who only became influential after his retirement and the end of Mapai-Labor Party hegemony.
Today, despite representing a small fringe, the disproportionate influence of anti-Zionist Jewish extremists in global campaigns demonizing Israel has reached an all-time high.
Ironically, the worst elements emanate from Israel.
There is the frenzied agitation by Israeli academics who abuse academic freedom by utilizing their universities as launching pads to delegitimize their own country. Neve Gordon, a political science lecturer at Ben-Gurion University and a typical Jewish defamer of Zion, published an opinion piece last year in The Los Angeles Times calling on the international community to boycott Israel. He and others like him, funded by the Israeli government and philanthropic Diaspora Zionists, exploit their academic positions to support those seeking to destroy us.
A recent study by Im Tirtzu claims that over 90% of the false allegations of Israeli war crimes originating from Israel cited in the Goldstone report were provided by 16 NGOs who received close to $8 million from the New Israel Fund, an organization purporting to promote social integration and welfare in Israel, headed by former Meretz MK Naomi Chazan. The NIF also sponsors Arab-Israeli groups promoting a bi-national state and US lecture tours by Arab Israelis on Israel Independence Day promoting the Nakba and calling on American Jews to use their influence to replace The Israeli flag and Hatikva.
Last year Haaretz highlighted reports accusing the IDF of war crimes which were subsequently proven false. These received massive global media exposure and made a major contribution toward creating the hostile anti-Israeli climate preceding the Goldstone report.
THE ROT extends to the Diaspora, where as a matter of course anti-Israeli groups now employ Jewish spokesmen to cover up their bias and double standards. In the US, the demonizers of Zion are exploiting the eroding relationship between the Obama administration and Israel. Former American Jewish Congress director Henry Siegman described Israel as “the only apartheid regime in the Western world.” Jewish students at campuses are increasingly bombarded with anti-Israel diatribes by Jewish academics such as Norman Finkelstein, who supports Iranians and terrorists, even exploiting the Holocaust suffering of his parents to delegitimize Israel.
In the UK, Jewish parliamentarian Gerald Kaufman compares Hamas to Jewish fighters in the Warsaw Ghetto, disregarding the Hamas Charter which declares that the Day of Judgment will not come until all Jews are killed.
In Belgium, a Jewish playwright scripted a play in which the Philistines assume the role of Israelis and Samson emerges as a heroic Palestinian using a dynamite-loaded vest to blow up his oppressors.
Shlomo Sand, a political science lecturer at Tel Aviv University, achieved celebrity status in Europe by publishing a book titled The Invention of the Jewish People, a farrago of utter nonsense promoting the thesis that being the descendents of the Khazars from the Black Sea region who converted to Judaism in the eighth century, Jews have no historical affinity with the Land of Israel.
This was endorsed in a recent UK Financial Times article by Tony Judt, an American historian who regards the creation of Israel as a mistake and favors a binational state. Under the title “Israel must unpick its ethnic mix,” Judt expressed the hope that American Jews would detach themselves from Israel, as Irish-Americans did from Ireland.
The time has come for action – not to suppress freedom of expression, but to draw red lines between legitimate criticism of government policies and initiatives seeking to demonize and delegitimize the Jewish state. The first step must be to deny tenure in government-sponsored educational institutions to academics who brazenly collaborate with our enemies.
It is gratifying that opposition Kadima MKs are now calling for what will hopefully become a bipartisan investigation into the activities and sources of funding for the NIF and other NGOs.
Whenever criticized, those who call for boycotts of their own country and demonize the IDF as war criminals have the chutzpah to try to defame their critics as McCarthyites and fascists, and threaten libel proceedings. It is their behavior which is morally reprehensible, and we must not be intimidated by such hypocritical tactics.
Israelis and the global Jewish community should be under no illusions. The damage inflicted by Jews collaborating with Israel’s enemies to demonize or delegitimize their country is immense. The only way to neutralize the impact of these renegade groups is to expose and confront them.






82 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 12, 2010 at 10:53 am
PT
ignore that troll
February 12, 2010 at 10:56 am
Biodegradable
pretzelburger, you say to me:
Now you’re being childish. Answer your own question and move on.
Here’s your reply to Medusa, I give it back to you as my last ever reply to you:
I read your post and offered a brief response – but am I under any obligation to respond to every single question you ask? Who do you think you are?
Gey geshvint, and don’t be skint!
February 12, 2010 at 11:22 am
ItsikDeWembley
“The NIF also sponsors Arab-Israeli groups promoting a bi-national state and US lecture tours by Arab Israelis on Israel Independence Day promoting the Nakba and calling on American Jews to use their influence to replace The Israeli flag and Hatikva.”
And….???
So what?
Thay are intitle to their opinion. Why shouldn’t they?
Why should the Tikva song not incorporate some Arab, Druze and Beduin elements?
Why should the flag not incorporate some?
Are there no non-Jewish citisens who serve in our armed forces?
do some not contribute to hospitals, police forces and fire brigades?
I disagree with these ideas but never the less I understand why some of the 20% non Jewish people feel unease about saluting a flag that have not a mention of their cultural identity, or a national anthem which speaks beautifuly about the Jewish yearning to Zion but leave them out.
Are they not entitled to be part of that puzzle?
My opinion on this is not important but I can respect theirs, even if it differs from mine.
And I hope all Israelis show some respect to people like IDF Sergeant Major Ihab Khatib From Mrar Village, which was stabbed to death yesterday in the Shomron on route back to his base.
I am certain that those who contribute are in full favour to maintain the Jewish nature of our country and preserve it’s unique identity but showing them our gratitude for their support in small symbols can only lock our fate together and secure the bridges between our cultures.
I would read what the village members of the fallen soldier have to say and how strong they feel about preserving our state.
May all our soldiers return safe home.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3847349,00.html
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3847179,00.html
February 12, 2010 at 11:35 am
Abandon hope
cityca
“… it is time for Israel to amend and revoke the Right of Return for those Jews who make it clear they hate Israel. ”
This could be problematic. There will be borderline cases …shades of hating that will require committees to decide who qualifies ,,rules will have to worked out …..what if the children love Israel but the parents are haters etc etc …easier just to put the energy into making peace ?
February 12, 2010 at 12:02 pm
Independent Observer
Itsik, you’re not doing Arab Israelis much good. In fact, you – and their MK’s – are doing them considerable harm.
The more you and the far left and Israeli-Arabs MK’s insist that Israel be de-judaised (or that, in Israel itself, Jews must be seen as just another ethnic group), the more the Israeli public will come to see Israeli Arabs as a fifth column which must be put out of the country. That’s not the Israeli public’s view now – but youre working hard to change it into one of disrust.
Indeed, Lieberman’s idea of a loyalty oath is unlikely to have arisen withot Arab MK agitation to de-judaise the state.
Israeli Arabs would be wiser to concentrate on quotidian, bread-and-butter issues.
February 12, 2010 at 1:36 pm
peter1
Itsik, you’re in England now, perhaps you should begin lobbying to change the Union Jack, it is rather offensive to non-Christians, and how can anybody expect Jews to be in the armed services fighting under the banner of a cross?????
The National Anthem, absolutely must be changed, how can a democratic society revere “royalty”???
Only religious fanatics can identify with homage to god in the National Anthem
What the heck, I’m not in the UK so its none of my business.
February 12, 2010 at 2:33 pm
Gerald
Peter 1 what an excellent question you ask ,” how can a democratic society revere “royalty”???”
Itsik is in England, I’m in Wales and you are in good old Democratic Canada where the Head of State is?….. Oh look what a coincidence the Head of State of Canada is Queen Elizabeth II.
So tell me how does a Democratic society like Canada revere royalty?
February 12, 2010 at 2:44 pm
peter1
Gerald, good question.
Except I don’t happen to care, the crosses in the Union Jack never stopped non-Christians from being loyal Brits, neither did the mention of god or royalty…..that happens to be the point.
Send her to Halifax
To pay her income tax
God shave the queen.
February 12, 2010 at 2:58 pm
Independent Observer
Abtalyon
one of the chief apologists for the settlers’ political agitation that formed the background to that murder.
Let me ask you a question about that “background”:
The US Constitution requires all foreign treaties to have the approval of at least two third of the Senate.
Had Rabin had the treaty approved by at least 50% of Jewish MK’s, whom could Yigal Amir then have blamed? The whole Knesset?
And please don’t claim that I’m justfying Amir. I’m not. I’m simply pointing out that different handling of the treaty approval process might have “cornered” the settler extremists, so they’d have had nobody to blame except the whole of Israel. And Rabin might still be alive.
I hope future PM’s have the wisdom to ensure future treaties with the Palestinians approved by at least 50% of Jewish MK’s.
February 12, 2010 at 3:22 pm
pretzelberg
@ Biodegradable
You seem to be saying that I insisted you answer questions from me. In fact it was you who asked me a silly question that you already knew the answer to.
Strange.
As Biodegradable is never going to reply to me ever again: can someone else decipher their last comment?
Ta.
February 12, 2010 at 3:30 pm
pretzelberg
@ peter1
how can anybody expect Jews to be in the armed services fighting under the banner of a cross?????
An interesting point in theory. I could never imagine e.g. a concerted campaign by British Jews to have the Union Jack redesigned for that reason. British Muslims, however … Well, actually I can’t imagine that scenario either – but perhaps you see what I’m thinking.
p.s. I was about to ask “God is mentioned in the national anthem??”
Then the penny dropped.
Must pay more attention in class …
February 12, 2010 at 3:31 pm
SarahLeah
Berchmans, re your true colours and your excuse above – were you mobbed into telling Mitnaged that hating Jews is OK “if they deserve it” and that he/she made it sound like antisemitism, or was that the considered view of some who in his own words “…as you know I consider myself the epitome of an anti discriminatory pc voice…..?”
Take your time. Wouldn’t want to rush you.
February 12, 2010 at 4:20 pm
peter1
pretzelberg
@ peter1
how can anybody expect Jews to be in the armed services fighting under the banner of a cross?????
An interesting point in theory. I could never imagine e.g. a concerted campaign by British Jews to have the Union Jack redesigned for that reason.
—————————————————————————————
Again, that was the point.
When you have the NIF calling for a re-write of Israel’s national anthem and a re-design of Israel’s flag you have to wonder about their motivation and loyalty to the country.
There is one country with a magen david in the flag, how many have a cross?
The national anthem
As long as the Jewish spirit is yearning deep in the heart,
With eyes turned toward the East, looking toward Zion,
Then our hope – the two-thousand-year-old hope – will not be lost:
To be a free people in our land,
The land of Zion and Jerusalem.
The British anthem
God save our gracious Queen!
Long live our noble Queen!
God save the Queen!
Send her victorious,
Happy and glorious,
Long to reign over us,
God save the Queen.
The Italian anthem
Brothers of Italy,
Italy has awoken,
With Scipio’s helmet
Binding her head.
Where is Victory?
Let her bow down,
For God has made her
Rome’s slave.
Let us join in cohort,
We are ready to die!
We are ready to die!
Italy has called!
We were for centuries
Downtrodden and derided,
Because we are not one people,
Because we are divided.
Let one flag, one hope
Gather us all.
The hour has struck
For us to join together!
Let us join in cohort,
We are ready to die!
We are ready to die!
Italy has called!
Let us unite and love one another;
Union and love
Show the people
The way of the Lord
Let us swear to free
Our native soil;
United under God,
Who can defeat us?
Let us join in cohort,
We are ready to die!
We are ready to die!
Italy has called!
From the Alps to Sicily,
Legnano is everywhere;
Every man has the heart
And hand of Ferruccio
The children of Italy
Are all called Balilla;
Every trumpet blast
Sounds the Vespers.
Let us join in cohort,
We are ready to die!
We are ready to die!
Italy has called!
Mercenary swords,
They’re feeble reeds.
The Austrian eagle
Has already lost its plumes.
The blood of Italy
And the Polish blood
It drank, along with the Cossack,
But it burned her heart.
Let us join in cohort,
We are ready to die!
We are ready to die!
Italy has called!
February 12, 2010 at 7:06 pm
pretzelberg
@ peter1
I fully understand those who defend the Israeli national anthem.
But I also understand why native non-Jews complain about it.
After all: it’s not as if they’re immigrants.
(and that’s where any comparisons to the UK fall flat)
February 12, 2010 at 7:49 pm
sababa
Abtalyon, since the thread is so long, I’ll quote from your post what I want to take up:
“What is clear is that these groups have no connection with the Zionist Centre-Left political scene and Harel’s attempt( like Leibler’s above) to make that connection is both dishonest and reprehensible.”
OK, if these organizations are fringe talk shops for the Arab/Palestinian intelligentsia — which would very much like to sharpen Palestinian identity by being stridently anti-Zionist (much easier than being FOR something…) — why would the NIF contribute to their funding?
I agree with you that these are fringe groups, but by channeling funds to such groups, the NIF is making a statement, and it is this statement that doesn’t do anything to make the left attractive to people in the mainstream center who might be won over by the left if it gave out a bit more realistic message about Palestinians, peace etc. A left that panders to groups that have the delegitimization of Israel as their main priority isn’t very attractive to the vast majority of Israelis — it’s that simple. That is one reason why Kadima was so successful.
February 12, 2010 at 9:23 pm
peter1
“After all: it’s not as if they’re immigrants.
(and that’s where any comparisons to the UK fall flat)”- pretzelberg
my my who are the indigenous “British” that make up the country?
Anglo-Saxons?
Normans?
Surely 80% of Brits can trace their lineage and be recognized as indigenous.
I have little patience for anybody who is off to the races about Jews being immigrants to their own land.
February 13, 2010 at 3:12 am
Ahasonist
Peter1,
that’s A bit of a straw man. It’s not that anyone was saying that Jews were immigrants, just that they live alongside non-Jewish natives.
February 13, 2010 at 5:59 am
Margie
Ahasonist the non-Jewish natives – and other non-Jewish citizens – live alongside us and each other. An immensely high proportion of all sectors of the population are proud and happy to live in Israel, which renders them a standard of living and earns them respect that most people in the Middle East don’t enjoy. Speak to them yourself. They will confirm it.
Those who make common cause with our enemies are welcome to join those they admire.
What singles out critics of other countries from the critics of Israel is that those who criticise the UK will never say disband the UK and give it to all to the French, but we are faced by hordes who wish to disband the most successful country in the Middle East and replace it with one that hasn’t even managed to establish a decent infrastructure despite abundant sympathy, expert help from anyone they apply to and bountiful charity from the riches of the world.
February 13, 2010 at 7:07 am
pretzelberg
peter1
I have little patience for anybody who is off to the races about Jews being immigrants to their own land.
Are you referring to me? If so, you have misunderstood my comment.
February 13, 2010 at 7:49 am
modernityblog
pretzelberg,
You must feel fairly aggrieved that people read your innocuous posts in such a negative light?
Has it ever occurred to you that they do so mostly in response to **your** own nitpicking, pedantry and desire to rid the worst into the remarks of others?
Has it occurred to you that the response you receive is proportional to your attitude, which is mostly negative, slow and not terribly well informed?
pretzelberg, why not turn over a new leaf?
Go on, apologise to everyone, especially Israelinurse, for your poor attitude and hope in the future that they won’t read your comments in such a negative light?
Otherwise people will treat you as you treat them, negatively
The choice is yours.
February 13, 2010 at 9:01 am
HairShirt
Margie, excellent arguments.
February 13, 2010 at 10:27 am
Mitnaged
Amyisraelchai, I am proud to be associated with a university in the UK which refused to have anything to do with the attempted UCU boycott of Israeli academics.
It has thriving Israel and Muslim societies.
When I indicated about a year ago that a poster about the I/P conflict was less than helpful to furthering constructive debate, my suggestion was taken seriously.
This is one university in the UK but I have no doubt that there are others. It has Israeli lecturers who may or may not be against Israel – my point is that they keep their political views to themselves so far as I am aware.
In the work I do I am only too aware of the power differential between lecturer and student. In my opinion no university lecture theatre should be the platform for a lecturer’s own political views unless they are germane to what is under discussion and unless that lecturer is willing to be argued with.
In the absence of that, such a lecturer is attempting to use his/her power unethically and that should be a disciplinary matter.
February 13, 2010 at 10:29 am
Margie
Thank you HairShirt.
February 13, 2010 at 10:43 am
Abtalyon
Sababa:
I have no connections whatsoever with NIF but I identify with the declared aims of that organization which sees the establishment of complete equality of social and political rights for all its inhabitants, without regard to religion, race or gender as a necessary prerequisite to true democracy in Israel.
In accordance with this goal, NIF funds a whole host of groups and associations, many having very modest aims. I suggest you read about them on the NIF website and form your own opinion.
http://www.nif.org/issue-areas/grantees/
I’m sorry to see you taken in by the slogan “the left panders to the Arabs and their supporters.” This is repeated ad nauseam by political opponents at every election despite having no basis in reality. So-called mainstream voters might benefit from actually thinking about who and what they are voting for, though I don’t hold out much hope for that.
The success of Kadima – actually Tzipi Livni – at the last election illustrates the old saw of being able to fool some of the people some of the time. The results of that unfortunate choice can be seen in and out of the Knesset one year later.
February 13, 2010 at 11:16 am
Abtalyon
IndependentObserver:
Sorry, have just seen your posting.
Your suggestion concerning the passage of peace treaty legislation involving at least 50% support from Jewish MK’s has racist overtones and is totally unacceptable. For obvious reasons, the late Menahem Begin would disagree with you, too.
May I point out that Israeli Arab MK’s have been members of the Likud, Labour and Meretz parties; they are not confined to Hadash, Balad and the others.
Most settlers were as shocked at Rabin’s murder as the rest of the country and condemned Amir. However, the soul-searching process which followed was incomplete in that Amir’s mentors within the settler religious milieu were allowed to escape responsibility and leaders like Harel, by appealing for national unity and reconciliation, helped to blur the memory of Rabin uncomplainingly having to run a nightly gauntlet of hate-filled demonstrators outside his home or the infamous demonstrations in Jerusalem in which his likeness appeared dressed in SS uniform.
February 13, 2010 at 2:40 pm
JerusalemMite
Abtalyon
I’m sorry to see you taken in by the slogan “the left panders to the Arabs and their supporters.” This is repeated ad nauseam by political opponents at every election despite having no basis in reality. So-called mainstream voters might benefit from actually thinking about who and what they are voting for, though I don’t hold out much hope for that. The success of Kadima – actually Tzipi Livni – at the last election illustrates the old saw of being able to fool some of the people some of the time. The results of that unfortunate choice can be seen in and out of the Knesset one year later.
Perhaps qualification is needed here.
The extreme left panders to the Arabs and their supporters
I consider myself left and see the extreme left as an extreme embarrassment. I can sympathise with the predicament of many Muslims but they must pick themselves up and not wait for others to do so.
The extreme left is thoroughly abhorrent to me. Most of them appear openly anti Semitic while many, like Berchmans, tell themselves that they are not anti Semitic when they are. Very much like closet homosexuals in denial.
The Bigots Brigade on CiF are mostly extreme lefties, some Jewish, some Israeli. All seem to me to be cases for psychological evaluation. I say this without malice. Their obsession with the I/P conflict while excluding other far more bloodthirsty conflicts all the time excusing horrible regimes like Iran, N. Korea and Venezuela, make me sick to think that the word ‘Left’ includes myself and them.
February 15, 2010 at 4:30 am
ItsikDeWembley
@ Indepndent Observer:
“Indeed, Lieberman’s idea of a loyalty oath is unlikely to have arisen withot Arab MK agitation to de-judaise the state.”
Why of course.
I must have imagened the full crowd in Teddy stadium showting “death to the arabs” while playing Taibe in the early 80′s.
And of course I must have imagined the old ashkenazi national guard volunteer which went on our bus in 2002 asking the 2 Morrocan chaps, from Kiryat Shemona (which happen to look like arabs – shocking!), for ID cards and when realising they were Jews he went white as a sheet as if he insulted their mother.
Son, racism is there and it is not by ignoring it or asking the loyal minority to bow down and be quiet that it will go away.
Didn’t work for us Jews in the UK for the past 900 years, now did it?!
As for changing the Tikva ans the flag.
It is not something I would like to see.
But I would not call fellow Jewish countrymen who call for greater cultural acknowledgment of the minorities who serve by our side in our struggle to preserve this nation as a Unique Jewish homeland, which will forever house and defend all her children, a rebegade group or Jews who seek Israel’s destruction.
Some do, maybe even most examples brought forward.
But some are genuine concerns by Israelis who seek to acknowledge the minorities living and serving in it.
February 15, 2010 at 4:41 am
ItsikDeWembley
Peter:
“Send her to Halifax
To pay her income tax
God shave the queen.”
Boy, you will not fit in our Liberal synagogue! The Sidur have a long prayer for the Queen and her household.
As I said I do not believe our flag or anthem should be changed.
But I don’t believe people who call for it necessarily “support those seeking to destroy us.”
Do you?
February 15, 2010 at 7:07 am
pretzelberg
@ modernityblog
What a twisted, hate-filled world you must live in.
You’re effectively saying that some people here deliberately misconstrue my comments. Not only do you justify that – you’re one of them yourself.
You refer to my “attitude, which is mostly negative, slow and not terribly well informed?”. Yawn …
And you, of course, are a master of rhetoric and a veritable font of knowledge?!?!
You spend too much time on this website on truly pathetic attempts to harrass me.
But I’m staying here – so get used to it.
The choice is yours
You seem to be insinuating that this partly yours and that I am am some kind of outsider.
Interesting …
Stick to the topics, please.
February 15, 2010 at 7:11 am
pretzelberg
– insinuating that this website is partly yours–
February 15, 2010 at 7:41 am
smtx01
Check out the ‘Talk 2 Hamas’ thread on Todays cif Morning comments.
February 15, 2010 at 10:34 pm
Independent Observer
Oh dear, Itsik, I really am worried for the state of health of your grey cell. It must be terribly lonely.
I pointed out that the recent Arab-Israeli drive to de-Judaise the state seems to have provoked Liebermn’s recent idea of a loyalty oath. Now, to refute that, you would have to show the chronology wrong. But you didn’t. Your assertion of discrimination of long date does nothing whatsoever to disprove the causal link I asserted.
You have also made quite a number of unwarranted assumptions:
* You have assumed but not proved tat an Arab drive to de-judaise Israel is a justifiable response to discrimination. But it is not. There are dozens of states in which a state religion is embedded either nominally (England) or profoundly (dozens of Muslim countries), all of which claim to treat citizens equally. Why must Israel be better than England – in the middle of a half-century-long war?
* You have assumed but not proved every minority entitled to complete and perfect equality – even in the midst of a war against the state. There exists no such state of complete and perfect equality. Haughty Europe itself practises cultural domination; France would not consider for a moment a demand that “nos ancêtres, les Gaulois” no longer be taught; Europe has done nothing significant to halt Czech discrimination against Roma, and not for one millisecond would the Czech Republic tolerate a demand that it become no longer Czech in order to satisfy the Roma.
* In fact, though hardly perfect, Israel’s treatment of Arab citizens is remarkable – including positive discrimination for Bedouin and a dozen Arab MK’s. In the similar (but less critical) situation of war against a foreign threat, even Canada and the USA interned their own Japanese residents regardless of citizenship.
* You have assumed – as do Muslims commonly – that every minor incident is a tragedy which absolutely demands correction. I disagree. Many minorities (including those in the world’s most civilised countries) live with annoyances every day. By what right do Muslims demand a perfect world – especially when they are so unwilling to accommodate others?
* Quite obviously, Israel’s treatment of minorities, however flawed, is superb compared to most Muslim countries’. For example, in Iran:
* You ought to learn from Wafa Sultan, who pointed out that Jews obtained respect precisely because they did not divert their energies to revenge against Germany despite much greater offense. So, too, Arab Israelis should place daily annoyances in similar perspective.
* You have assumed – as do Muslims commonly – the Arab or Muslim never to bear any responsibility for his own situation. But Lieberman’s idea of a loyalty oath – unlikely to come to pass in any case – might not have occurred had Israeli Arabs (as Jews in many countries and Druse and Bedouin in Israel) made it a point of civic responsibility and pride for all of their youth to volunteer for service in the IDF, to protect the country to which they so adamantly adhere whenever the idea of a swap arises.
You seem to think de-Judaising Israel will solve Israeli-Arab problems. You are living in a fantasy world. Such de-Judaisation will never come to pass; with dozens of Arab nations, the Jews will never give up a right to one tiny nation of their own. Worse, the more Arab Israelis agitate for such de-Judaisation, the less Jewish Israelis will trust them, and the result will be either the improbable loyalty oath or the much more probable land swap.
In other words, Israeli Arabs are jawboning themselves right out of Israel.