Advocating the blowing up of Tony Blair

But the police are already fully-occupied, harassing SeismicShock on behalf of Sizer!

It has been deleted. I can wear my sandals with pride! :)

armaros

This is what George Galloway said also.

Surely not.

The Gorgeous One advocating violence.

Unbelievable.

JerusalemMite

“The Gorgeous One advocating violence”

No he didnt advocate violence. Look he is a buffoon…you should be able to score points without making things up.

The Guardian is on a few crusades. Hates the US. Hates the demonstratable success of the Free market Economies especially when compared to the abject failure of Marx type economics. hate the success of multi party democracies as opposed to one party, so called, democracies.

Its front page reporting is orientated to finding fault with the above and they do have their faults. However, they are so much better and more successful than what the editorial management cabal want to see.

On CiF, the editorial bias really comes into play so much more strongly. Taking the I/P conflict. Probably 8:1 of articles in some way trying to paint the ‘evil Zionist entity’ as an illegal and brutish state ruled by religious zealots. This then presents as logical, that Israel is no better that Iran.

And the moderation policy is published as one thing but is actually something entirely different. It is used to subtly present the GWV as the ‘norm’ whereas, in reality. It is the fantasy of seriously deranged people who will not accept others point of view. For them, Israel=bad, Palestinians/Arabs/Muslims=good. I am sure that there is some psychological explanation for this debilitating condition. It is something that affects hard core BNP members as well.

In short. It affects all extremists.

So this is now the third explicit call for murder en masse (all Jews on the WB) or of a politician (Shimon Peres) or assassination (Tony Blair) to appear on CiF.

If proof was need of the type of reader the Guiardian is attracting these days, we are starting to see it writ large.

The assassination of Yitzhak Rabin started in the same way – calls for his death that ultimately triggered the idea in a fanatic’s mind to translate words into action.

The Guardian should be thinking seriously of shutting down CiF except for articles dealing with whether to put milk in before the tea or after. There are enough neo-Nazi and ultra-left-Wing and jihadi sites out there to do the job they seem to be doing without their help.

AKUS

The Guardian should be thinking seriously of shutting down CiF except for articles dealing with whether to put milk in before the tea or after

But that in itself is a veritable powderkeg of an issue, AKUS. How can you be so ignorant?

Probably 8:1 of articles in some way trying to paint the ‘evil Zionist entity’ as an illegal and brutish state ruled by religious zealots

I think JerusalemMite and Berch are in a battle to post the most ridiculous hyperbole on this site.

dopey Berchmans, don’t lecture us. It’s really naff coming from such a one as you.

I note that Berchmans is trying to be Mr Nice-Guy-with-a-sense-of-humour who goes right away to complain against antisemitism on CiF on this thread but he’s still a card-holding member of the Guardian World View Society.

The real Berchmans is still posting to CiF , the same twisted soul who can’t understand why anyone could blame Hamas for behaving as it does – sacrificing its people and its children, encouraging them to die for Allah by teaching them that death, rather than life, is glorious, particularly if they explode themselves among Jews, and he is on record as saying that the Hamas Charter, which advocates this same Jew-hatred and is the basis for suicide murder of Israelis is a “negotiating stance!”

This from CiF. It’s a good job he’s honest in his Janus-facedness isn’t it? I dread to think what he might be like if he was actually good at al-takeyya):

Here’s what he wrote, brought to our attention by HairShirt:

“Berchmans

8 Feb 2010, 4:54PM

Keo2008

.

“Hamas wants to destroy Israel. ”

.

Its a negotiating stance.I am sure they would settle for the 67 green line , some water and some reassurances. The point I make as you well know as you always respond to this.. is that what a brutalised, hidden and poverty striken people put on a document is of secondary consideration to the cause of the problem.

What kind of document would you write scurrying about in reinforced basements ..hiding from the astonishingly successful IDF after 60 years of watching your relatives and friends being bumped off? I dream that one day Jewish and Muslim children will walk hand in hand…? He would have been in an Israeli jail before you could say equality. :)

B”

HairShirt continues, and I endorse:

All of this shows, Berchmans, that you are a duplicitous and deliberately mendacious b*****d, whose unreconstructed ideas are not capable of amendment however reasoned and shored up by provable facts might be the opposing arguments. For all you may write here about condemning antisemitism you post something completely other on CiF

Well written HairShirt!