This is a cross post of an article by Julie Burchill which was originally published in the Jewish Chronicle on January 21, 2010
One of my dearest Jewish compadres, the young writer Emma Forrest, once said to me — after observing me simultaneously talking to my cat, reading Heat magazine, drinking a blue cocktail at noon and watching the live streaming of Big Brother — “Wow, you really are a goy, aren’t you?”
I thought of this recently when I cancelled my plan to attend the University and College Union seminar in Brighton on antisemitism because said cat was under the weather. But, all in all, I think it was for the best. As my husband put it: “If the antisemites attack the Jews quietly, you’ll defend them loudly, and you will look like the nutter!”
He wasn’t wrong. The world of left-wing antisemitism is indeed such a parallel universe of pretzel logic and inverted values that even a mild-mannered, scrupulously fair, middle-of-the-roader like myself can be tarred with the Zionist-thug brush just for venturing the opinion — in a teeny-tiny, pleasantly rural-type voice — that Israel is not the worst country in the entire world when it comes to human rights.
My mind roamed back to last summer when, after a meeting of the excellent Trades Union Friends of Israel, an Israeli comrade came up and spoke to me in Hebrew because my prolonged snarling at antisemitic hecklers was of such a sustained level that she couldn’t believe that any well-behaved British Jew — let alone a gentile!— would react in such a way.
It’s becoming quite a habit — swerving conferences on the A-S word. Last month, I went all the way to Jerusalem in order, as it turned out, not to attend the Global Forum on Antisemitism, choosing instead to go out on the famous 99 tour-bus, where for four hours I veered wildly between tears and cheers as we visited the sites of much Jewish sorrow and joy.
It’s not that I don’t want to know how bad antisemitism is/was. It’s that I’ve known since I was 12 years old, when I saw a photograph of Shoah survivors in a newly liberated death camp in my dad’s The World At War magazine, felt the planet shift beneath my feet and offered up the silent prayer (I was an atheist at this point) that, if I could be on their side, the side of the Jews (I wouldn’t even meet one for another five years), then I would become a believer.
The deal being done, I didn’t need to be drawn a diagram of Dachau. I still haven’t seen Schindler’s List. I don’t watch TV programmes about newly discovered facts concerning the Third Reich — not even my brother-in-law’s effort, which was called something like Abba’s Nazi Secret. (Poor Frida, the brunette, was unlucky enough to have had one of the scumbags as a dad.)
I suppose I haven’t really moved on, intellectually, from when I was 17 and broke ranks to run at the National Front, as they were marching through Lewisham, screaming: “You hate Jews, you will die!” and coming this close to being crushed by a police horse.
But then I have not changed sides, either, unlike a lot of other so-called left-wing people who certainly have — by becoming the kind of antisemitic fascist who has driven so many good socialists out of the UCU.
As the philosopher Eve Garrard wrote two years ago in her resignation letter:
“There has been a constant deployment of some of the most traditional stereotypes of antisemitism, thinly concealed under the fig-leaf of anti-Zionism. Repeated (and demonstrably false) claims have been made that Israel is committing genocide, and is comparable to the Nazis… It has been explicitly asserted by Union activists that those members who resist this demonising of the Jewish state, and who are concerned about the double standards being deployed in the boycott project, are manipulatively trying to distract others from Israel’s crimes… this Union is no longer a fit place for those who think that Jews have the same rights of self-determination, self-defence, and national identity as other peoples do, and I hereby resign from it.”
So, on balance, for once, I’m quite pleased with myself (for being a dumb old Commie redneck, stuck in the one-size-fits-all socialism of the past).



31 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 5, 2010 at 3:07 am
Margie
Julie, But then I have not changed sides, either, unlike a lot of other so-called left-wing people who certainly have Would that there were more like you. Not yielding to the fashionable in politics must have taken its toll on you professionally. I applaud your continued morality.
February 5, 2010 at 4:10 am
GaryO
Oh, what I would give to see a 17 year old girl today screaming at Hamas supporters marching through the streets of London carrying placards proclaiming Hitler as their hero: “You hate Jews, you will die!”.
Wonderful!
In a cruel irony that obviously escapes them, they call themselves “progressives” now – this alliance between the left and anti-Semitic militant islam.
There was a conference of them in London recently. Worth paying their web site a visit just to see who the speakers were.
http://www.progressivelondon.org.uk/conference/progressive-london-conference-2010.html
And true to form, there was also an article on Cif in celebration of this event.
February 5, 2010 at 4:27 am
JerusalemMite
Julie. I don’t know who you are but I enjoyed reading your above article.
February 5, 2010 at 6:26 am
Mitnaged
Julie, many thanks for this.
February 5, 2010 at 7:20 am
David
Ignorance really is bliss.
Burchill is, and always has been, a dilletante. As her whole approach to anti-semitism shows from start to finish.
There is not an “in” thing she hasn’t tried for a time, her sole criteria being that it is, in some undefined way, “contrary” to her parents’ expectations – lesbianism, Lutheranism, feminism, Trotskyism, drug addiction, Zionism, Judaism.
She is, in other words, a child in an aged woman’s body.
Still, by their friends shall we know thee.
February 5, 2010 at 8:43 am
modernityblog
An otherwise sincere article spoilt by bad sub-editing and an unnecessarily provocative title.
It conveys an inaccurate picture of trade unionists.
Anyone who has been active in opposing boycotts in UCU, or its predecessor the AUT, will know there have been defeats as well as successes.
That it is not necessarily the fault of trade unions, rather small obsessive groups within them who use the conflict in the Middle East for their own political purposes, and in doing so stir up racism against Israelis and Jews. That is the problem
But this has not been a one-sided fight.
Engage, started by David Hirsh and Jon Pike on a shoestring, has fearlessly highlighted the dangers of antisemitism, critique the arguments and where it all leads.
I suggest readers take the time to study Engage’s old web site and the newer blog to gain a balanced appreciation of events and what actually happened.
http://www.engageonline.org.uk/home/
Their journal
http://www.engageonline.org.uk/journal/index.php?journal_id=5
David Hirsh’s paper Anti-Zionism and antisemitism: cosmopolitan reflections is well worth a read.
February 5, 2010 at 10:16 am
Vatik
Modernityblog “ an inaccurate picture of trade unionists.”? Standing up against boycotts isn’t the only way these people must be stopped. David Hirsch, for all his rhetoric about anti-Semitism on campuses, still hasn’t come up with anything definitive as a solution, and your merely describing them as “small obsessive groups” totally trivialises the wide-reaching effect they have. They have done irreparable damage to the good name of Trade Unions, and just concentrating on how they foster anti-Semitism doesn’t even come into it.
The accurate picture is that it is the failure of the rank and file members to stand up to the leftist Trot bully boys who’ve infiltrated the higher echelons of quite a few Trade Unions – this is where the blame must fall.
Before I get told I don’t know what I’m talking about – I have been involved in Trade Unionism for many years, having been a Union representative, and then I spent many years as a branch executive officer. I’ve seen it happen in my own Union. The rank and file membership could not give a damn about the politicisation of their unions, and even less about what they, as grass roots members could do about it. These “members” hardly ever turn up to meetings where their votes count, and where they can air their views and make a difference, they do not speak out against the Stalinist behaviour of the Socialist Workers Party, the anti-Nazi League and the like, where most of these “invaders” come from in order to deliberately get themselves elected to committees in Unions by default, and, then they (the members) wonder why they’re suddenly in the midst of a Stalinist nightmare, where if they do not support anything these brainwashed idiots demand support for – they are intimidated and hounded out in some cases. I’ve seen it happen.
Talk about partners in their own demise!
February 5, 2010 at 10:26 am
Gert
Burchill is a despicable character, all attention-deficit, controversy hunting hysteria. Why anyone would want to have here on one’s side is a mystery to me. I suggest reading up on the following encounter between ‘Jewlie Burchill’ and some British Jews that didn’t really go too well:
http://melpoluck.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/tangled-up-in-jews-but-why/
February 5, 2010 at 11:15 am
Gerald Kreeve
Gert I don’t know Ms Burchill at all, but the spelling that you use sounds rather as if you are characterising her unnecessarily. There are people who cry out of tension and emotion. What reason have you got to call her despicable.
Who are you?
February 5, 2010 at 11:25 am
iva
I have the same question
Who are you Gert?
I dont know her ,but read the link, she might be a tad overboard BUT
despicable?
are you sure you are not talking about yourself?
February 5, 2010 at 11:31 am
peterthehungarian
Hawkeye
I understand that this site is trying to be really free and not censor/moderate/edit/delete comments, but there must be a limit.
The proper place of this Gert-like shit must be in the dustbin.
February 5, 2010 at 11:37 am
Abandon hope
“The world of left-wing antisemitism is indeed such a parallel universe of pretzel logic and inverted values”
Israel supporters have to perform summersaults of logic in their defence of the “difficult to defend.”
I see “left wing” as a social ,rather than political divide and caring for people the ultimate human endevour.There is no such thing as a left wing anti Semite …a true left winger will value people beyond anything and will be incapable of discriminating against people on religious grounds.
February 5, 2010 at 11:50 am
Gerald Kreeve
I thought that Gert was speaking from the dustbin peterthehungarian.
February 5, 2010 at 11:58 am
TG
Mr Gert is known for stalking/flaming boards such as this one resentfully and I believe is best ignored
February 5, 2010 at 11:58 am
peterthehungarian
A fine example of leftist caring about the persecuted Jews.
Jews flee Malmö as anti-Semitism grows
February 5, 2010 at 12:18 pm
Mitnaged
Berchmans, people have argued with you time and time again, and often from their own lived experience, that the left is the breeding ground of antisemtism and has a symbiotic relationship with Islamism’s similar purpose. In my opinion they deserve each other, but their poison is beginning to affect the quality of life of all of us.
Now, please explain to me why these arguments which oppose yours, often supplied with proof and very cogently put, just don’t get through to you? What is it that you have such difficulty grasping? Is it, as Ms Burchill says, the “parallel universe of pretzel logic and inverted values” and the very complexity of how left-wing antisemitism works that mystifies you to such an extent that you deny that it is happening and insist that it is not?
Try to explain to us how such a one as you can hold on to such denial as if his very life depended on it.
February 5, 2010 at 12:23 pm
Independent Observer
Hmmm. “Gert” rhymes with “dirt”.
February 5, 2010 at 12:30 pm
HairShirt
peterthehungarian, thanks for posting this, but it is hardly surprising. After all the AftonBladet rubbish (battened onto by Sethele and CiF) was an index of what Sweden thinks of its Jews.
Modernityblog, thanks for pointing up David Hirsh’s study of the the left and antisemitism. It’s probably a bit complicated for dopey to take on board but perhaps if he takes it nice and slowly….
I was at the presentation at SOAS where people commented on it. It was an interesting evening indeed.
Is David Hirsh’s paper online? Could you post a link here if it is?
Thanks.
February 5, 2010 at 12:44 pm
Andrew
@Gerd 10:26
Your spelling “Jewlie” gives away your vitriolic agenda, doesn’t it?
The account you link to says this: “During her talk there was a lot of tutting and bemused looks from the – mostly middle aged, mostly Jewish – audience. It all began to get a bit embarrasing. She came across as increasingly sycophantic in her philosemitism and increasingly unhinged as the interview progressed.”
I was at that Limmud meeting in Brighton. Julie Burchill got loud applause at the end of her interview. A few people did not like her more controversial comments but her sincerity shone through. There was not a ‘lot of tutting” and no-one that I spoke to after thought her “sycophantic” or “unhinged”.
The one criticism I had was that her interviewer was not very good.
February 5, 2010 at 12:46 pm
Serendipity
Vatik, I can identify with what you say. Having been at the SOAS meeting (which I found stimulating) I also felt disappointed that in spite of David Hirsh’s erudition about his subject he seemed not to be able to offer any antidote to the left’s antisemitic poison.
From what I know of the current state of trade union functioning, the key word for their rank and file is indeed “apathy.” As you say, trots and others take advantage of this. It beggars belief that “resolutions” can be adopted when only a relatively small number of the membership has voted on them.
We have seen this in the recent, and, as it turned out, illegal UCU attempts to boycott Israeli academics (the fools seem not to realise that if they did, half our universities would be functioning well below their best). Creepiest of all, however, is how allegedly intelligent academics in UCU and elsewhere seem to want to fall over themselves to show that they are good Lefties by trying to outdo each other by adding to the OTT excoriation of Israel. Now THAT smacks of Stalinist Russia.
February 5, 2010 at 1:12 pm
AKUS
peterthehungarian
Thanks for the link. The anti0Semitism in Sweden is horrific, clearly due to to the enormous influence of the growing Moslem population they have foolishly allowed into their midst.
79 anti-Semitic acts against a population of less than 3,000 Jews in Malmo must put Malmo as the most anti-Semitic city in the world outside of Arab/Moslem countries on a percentage basis.
You can see the local Moslems in action here- violent demonstration in Malmo. After initially throwing rocks at a small group of Jews singing “Hinei matov u’manaim” – how pleasant it is to sit peacefully among brothers” at timestamp 3:30 you see them starting to fire rockets and throwing fireworks at the Jewish group – Gaza in Malmo.
February 5, 2010 at 1:16 pm
Margie
It was in Malmo that the Israeli Davis Cup team had to play in a silent empty arena because the local police refused to protect them, wasn’t it?
February 5, 2010 at 1:18 pm
AKUS
Sorry – the link to the rocket-firing demonstration must use the capital letters as shown below:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqZtJlG3zso
Copy and paste it.
February 5, 2010 at 1:45 pm
Vatik
AbandonHope “There is no such thing as a left wing anti Semite …a true left winger will value people beyond anything and will be incapable of discriminating against people on religious grounds.”
As a true left-winger, AbandonHope – have you actively valued people beyond anything, any people – including those who support Israel and Zionist ideals? Can you give us examples please – links, etc.? Or do you play for the other side?
February 5, 2010 at 1:58 pm
UnravelTheTangledThread
AbandonHope Your definition of a true left winger is puzzling – you said a true left-winger doesn’t discriminate against people “on religious grounds.” Obviously they’re allowed to demonise and refuse to listen to those with different IDEOLOGICAL views, we see and experience them doing this all the time. This clearly shows they only value SOME people “above anything”, doesn’t it?
February 5, 2010 at 2:00 pm
Abandon hope
Vatik
–
” have you actively valued people beyond anything, any people – including those who support Israel and Zionist ideals? Can you give us examples please – links, etc.? ”
I have written 200 posts ..maybe more ..to CIF ..calling for all attacks on Israeli civilians to be condemned. I have never ever balanced this with a call for Israeli violence to be taken into similar consideration…despite the gross differentials in deaths of civilians.
Despite their dishonest and brutal regime I support Israelis as people.
February 5, 2010 at 2:09 pm
Biodegradable
Julie Burchill is no “Julie come lately”.
Here’s an article she wrote some 6 years ago:
My nation of heroes, my chosen people . ..
February 5, 2010 at 2:16 pm
peter1
so sweet of our dear little troll, init?
Islamic Jihad, the Popular Resistance Committees, and the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades released a joint statement taking credit for three barrels loaded with explosives that washed up on beaches in Israel.
Oh yeah, these home-made “devices” didn’t explode for whatever reason and our troll is all puffed up with anger at Islamic Jihad, the Popular Resistance Committees, and the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, how dare they do such a thing !!!!!
shhhaaaaa, our troll doesn’t talk about this, our troll doesn’t know about this, our troll doesn’t give a damn about this and oy vay we are soooooo surprised.
not.
Why is this chaim yankle still around???
February 5, 2010 at 3:47 pm
HairShirt
oh-oh dopey. Did you hear that “clunk?” You walked into it once again….
You posted at least one antisemitic remark, didn’t you, to Mitnaged when he/she used to post on CiF, which said that you couldn’t blame Hamas for hating Jews “now” and that you’d hate them “big time” &c &c
You also said in the same post that hating Jews was OK “if they deserve it.”
Then you tried to weasel out of what you really meant here but dug yourself in still deeper because let’s face it you are no more believable than a vegetarian at a hog roast.
Don’t you get it, you idiot, that all your slogans on CiF don’t count for anything in the light of the foregoing?
What you NEED to do is to apologise to Mitnaged and the others whom you have offended and promise not to do it again.
You haven’t done that, have you?
Peter1 – “Why is this chaim yankle still around???”
Do you mean Berchmans? I actually think he has a masochistic kink. He keeps getting blatted and comes back for more!
February 5, 2010 at 4:23 pm
modernityblog
Abandon hope wrote: “I have written 200 posts ..maybe more ..to CIF ..calling for all attacks on Israeli civilians to be condemned.”
Have you? Really?
Frankly, only having seen your posts at CiF Watch, I thought you were a BNPer or some extreme Far Right crank. That is how your contributions here come over.
You seem to have a singular incapacity for dealing with the issue of antisemitism, your recent comment on another thread shows that:
http://cifwatch.com/2010/02/04/if-you-are-not-with-us-you-are-against-us/#comment-13546
“There is no “clear” anti Semitism on CIF and if there was you would have provided an example.”
None so blind as those that cannot see, eh?
Hawkeye and others provide daily examples of enmity towards Jews on CiF Watch, but all you do is quibble, sneer or make snide comments.
If you are not a BNP member, or one of their potential recruits, then you might want to rethink your attitude to the subject, because that’s how you come over.
February 6, 2010 at 11:06 am
JerusalemMite
modernityblog
Frankly, only having seen your posts at CiF Watch, I thought you were a BNPer or some extreme Far Right crank. That is how your contributions here come over.
Modernity. If you didn’t know, Abandon Hope is Berchmans, (incognito). of CiF/Georgina fame. You can tell by the deep intellectual depth of his narrative and of the wide understanding implicit in his writings.