This is a guest post by Israelinurse
On last week’s Lerman thread, Guardian editor Matt Seaton demonstrates that for a man who has made a career out of working with words, he seems to be having remarkable difficulty understanding those in the EUMC Working Definition of Antisemitism.
He rather clearly demonstrates his personal beliefs in the following comment:
mattseaton
20 Nov 2009, 9:55AM
@ heatwave2022:
For David Cesarani & Co all those who criticize Israel are anti-Semites.
I have to defend David Cesarani from that characterisation. Yes, he took strong exception to this documentary, but to categorise him therefore as in the camp of the ‘new antisemitism’ that would make an equivalence between criticism of Israel and anti-Jewish prejudice is entirely wrong.
So there we have it. Apparently there is a “camp of the ‘new antisemitism’ “, (note the scare quotes) about which Mr. Seaton seems pretty sceptical. One wonders if he has bothered to read the 2006 report of the British All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Anti-Semitism which clearly stated that anti-Zionism may become antisemitic when it embraces a view of Zionism as ‘a global force of unlimited power and malevolence throughout history’.
The same report states that traditional antisemitic motives of Jewish ‘conspiratorial power, manipulation and subversion’ are often transferred from Jews onto Zionism. The report notes that this is ‘at the core of the New Antisemitism’.
So let’s take a closer look at a few of the comments in a thread in which Matt Seaton was obviously personally active.
Ranong
20 Nov 2009, 10:54AM
How is it that the Israel lobby manages to ensure that the Minister for State for Israel ( sorry, I mean the Middle East) is always a senior member of Labour Friends of Israel?
The FCO was shocked by the appointment of Ivan Lewis MP after his genuinely appalling and callous comments on the carnage in Gaza.
No other foreign country (even our US bosses) has this sort of power.
Definitely some sort of conspiratorial thinking going on there. In fact that comment seems to fit the clause in the EUMC definition which cites “Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions” as one definition of antisemitism, as indeed does the barely-veiled insinuation by edwardrice:
edwardrice
20 Nov 2009, 6:33PM
I’d like it if there were more documentaries on the lobby industry.
It would surprise me if some of them were not interconnected.
Oil, Coal, Pharma, IT, Weapons, Nuclear, GM, Private Security (mercenaries) …
A comment by sqibby77 not only implies conspiracy theories but also falls into the category of “denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavour” as defined by the EUMC definition.
squibby77
20 Nov 2009, 3:09PM
It is utterly despicable that politicians allow themselves, their principles and their duty to their own country be bought in order to benefit a foreign power. British politicians should have the British public and their interests at the forefront of every decision they make.
As for the labelling of “antisemite” to anyone who opposes israels policies, i find it laughable. If going against the policies of a racist apartheid state makes me an antisemite, then so be it.
But hang on a second, what exactly does that word mean? semite refers to the people of semitic origin, namely the aramaic, arabic and hebrew people (from judea). It is common knowledge that the jews living within israel are not originally hebrew (from Judea), most are of eastern european origin (specifically ashkenazi khazarians) and have simply learnt hebrew. Learning Japanese doesnt make me a japanese person! The only people on this planet that are truly semitic are the arab speaking palestinians and hence the true antisemites are the hypocrites who like to shout it at every possible opportunity.
Unfortunately, these are by no means the only examples of equally dubious comments on that same thread which seem to have completely escaped Mr. Seaton’s attention, but I guess that if he does not accept that there is such a thing as new antisemitism in the first place, that’s hardly surprising.
The cynical employment of the dismissal of any attempts by Jews to counteract racist remarks against them by dismissing them as some sort of ‘cry wolf’ tactic is despicable in any circumstance. When it comes from the editor of a prominent British media outlet in the 21st century, British society has much food for very serious thought. I certainly cannot imagine any other minority group in the UK having its objections to bigotry used against it thrown back at in such a vile and malicious manner.
But such is the topsy-turvy world of Britain 2009.





20 comments
Comments feed for this article
November 25, 2009 at 3:30 am
Fairplay
Here’s a comment to the editor of the Guardian and his loyal readers concerning Israe :-
We’re not fooled by your excuses. A Jew or non-Jew who doesn’t wholeheartedly support Israel against its enemies is like a turkey looking forward to Xmas.
Let me recommend a brilliant article on this topic:
“Israel today, the West tomorrow” – Commentary Magazine / Israel and the Middle East / May 2009
November 25, 2009 at 4:16 am
armani
I would prefer it to be the West today,tomorrow,and the day after.After all they are already halfway there.I can happily picture the muezzin in the minaret calling the faithful to prayer five times a day.
Just imagine bearded Berchmans,moeran and Co.prostrate in total submission facing Mecca.
November 25, 2009 at 4:29 am
Serendipity
You hit several nails on the head, Israelinurse in this excellent article.
I believe that written in the Talmud (no doubt people will correct me if I am wrong about the location) is the following injunction:
“You shall not accustom yourself to smooth and deceptive speech.”
Seaton is not a Jew, although that doesn’t absolve him from guilt and blame, but Lerman and the rest of the CiF Theobald-Jew stable (including Sethele who spouts a lot about Judaism) claim to be.
November 25, 2009 at 5:12 am
Chas N-B
It’s the great double-assault: attack a people and then deny them the right to even complain about your attack. It’s cowardly and brutal. How do they sleep at night?
November 25, 2009 at 10:41 am
zkharya
I think the test is even simpler.
If Israel, the Jewish state of Israel, Israelis, Zionism or Zionists occupies the same place and role in someone’s discourse today as Jews, Judaism, Jewishness etc in the discourse of the conventional antisemite in the late and early 19th and 20th centuries respectively, their discourse is antisemitic.
It’s not enough to demonstrate that your discourse is not antisemitic as in the Golden Age of antisemitism. That antisemitism is irrelevant, because the object of its hatred, the 80% of the worlds’s Jews that once lived in European Christendom or Islam, are now gone. Their surviving descendants either comprise the American or Israeli Jewish communities, which compete in size, but not in an obvious Jewish identity, since Israel wins that hands down.
The study of antisemitism only reached its zenith decades after the holocaust i.e. decades too late, and its widespread, popular understanding, later than that. Conversely, the study of modern antisemitism is also decades behind, as is its popular understanding.
Thus modern antisemites can legitimately claim their detractors have little to no academic “proof”.
November 25, 2009 at 10:41 am
TomWonacott
IsraeliNurse
Much of the antisemitism is the same old hate that’s existed for the past couple of centuries. This was evident from the articles and posts on the Israel lobby in Britain recently which clearly was meant to expose (or suggest) “Jewish power”. Nothing really new about that concept. Jews were associated with power, money, manipulation and self interest by Marx and other socialist during the 19th century i.e., Jews and capitalism.
Right wing hate has been rejected by Europe for the most part. There is nothing subtle about people that base their hate on a supremacist philosophy. What’s alarming is that left wing antisemitism (Zionism is racism) has been accepted so readily by main stream (leftist) Europeans who have been manipulated by the media and academia. What’s new is that antisemitism is hidden behind an antiracist philosophy making many leftist completely unaware of their own bigotry. Antisemitism is clearly on the rise world-wide.
This kind of hate is far less prevalent in the US and Canada (in my opinion).
November 25, 2009 at 1:51 pm
HairShirt
TomWonacott, the left would align with any entity with which it had hatred in common.
November 25, 2009 at 2:19 pm
Fred Grubnik
Matt Seaton does the same thing that his buddies George Galloway and Ken Livingston do. He starts by saying that “they” will attack me for what I am about to say and “they” will try to silence me. Then, having started with the premise that any criticism of me or my money losing newspaper is illegitmate and immoral, Mr. Seaton goes on to bash Israel. And the Guardian repeats that any criticism of anybody at the Guardian is just pressure from what Oborne calls “The Zionist lobby”. It is all quite childish, and I wish I could debate Mr. Seaton or Tony Lerman. Well, I suppose I should take back the offer to debate Tony Lerman. I like more of a challenge than what he offers.
November 25, 2009 at 3:16 pm
TomWonacott
Hairshirt – “the left would align with any entity with which it had hatred in common.”
The proof lies in the British political party, Respect, which doesn’t support a Jewish state in the Middle East at all. Speak about the marriage of two opposing political philosophies. But, in addition, how about Chavez and Ahmadinejad (left and right)? All in opposition to America and Israel.
November 25, 2009 at 4:15 pm
pretzelberg
More crazy stuff here.
You talk about an (anti-Semitic) “barely-veiled insinuation” by edwardrice.
There was no insinuation at all.
He was talking about links between industry-related lobby groups.
@ Tom
“left wing antisemitism (Zionism is racism) has been accepted so readily by main stream (leftist) Europeans who”
This is nonsense, Tom. I’m a left-wing European, as are a large number of my friends. None of us considers Zionism to be a racist enterprise.
Have you seen e.g. Guardian editorials making such a claim? I think not.
p.s. Thanks (not) for the recent comment about my fake alterego on this site.
You know what? The other week my posts were cited 5 (five) times on this homepage (i.e. to retrieve dodgy comments by other posters that I challenged).
I’m not the bad guy you might think I am.
November 25, 2009 at 4:30 pm
Hawkeye
Pretzelberg
I’m really shocked by your blindspot when it comes to antisemitism.
You choose to defend the comment made by the same person that said this:
edwardrice’s comment December 16 2007 1:20
GBR
edwardrice
You all seem to be Jewish so doubt this is preventing you from seeing the issue clearly. But get this, this is UK and British interests are not the same as Israeli ones. You would do well to consider loyalties to the country you live in with a bit more gratitude.
Given edwardrice’s track record of antisemtism we are perfectly within our rights to read into his comment Jewish conspiracy theory.
November 25, 2009 at 6:15 pm
pretzelberg
@ Hawkeye
I do not keep a track record of posters and their comments (although I wish I had done on e.g. the Mitzvah Day thread). Obviously regulars like Moeran and Papalagi are on my radar. THe moniker edwardrice rang a bell, but just in the general sense of having seen it before on CiF.
Now obviously the comment you quote is despicable (and the vocab used suggests to me that this person is an all-out racist, i.e. I’m sure they have similar sentiments vis-à-vis all minorities).
But I was not aware of said quote and was merely judging the lobby post on its own, erm, “merits” (you know what I mean).
And sorry, but I still don’t – necessarily – see any anti-Semitic conspiracy insinuations in that post.
On a general note: thanks for having me and my unwelcome comments here – and citing me so often.
November 25, 2009 at 7:59 pm
TomWonacott
Prezelberg
“…..Have you seen e.g. Guardian editorials making such a claim? I think not…..”
I think that the idea that Israel is a racist nation (which was officially proclaimed by the UN in the 70′s) has significantly influenced the rise of antisemitism in Europe especially by the Anti American left. The Guardian doesn’t have to editorialize it, they can beat the idea in through their writers like Abudimah (an “ethnic religious supremecist state”), Neve Gorden (“apartheid” and the comparisons to South Africa), and through political cartoonist like Bell. Everyday, I can see the fruits of their labor (and that of the UN) from everyday posters just like us. I’ve stated in the past that certainly not all left wing Europeans are antisemites. Not by a long shot, but for example, if a poll shows that “more than 50 percent of Germans equate Israel’s policies toward the Palestinians with Nazi treatment of the Jews”, that’s a troubling statistic. Symbolic comparisons of Israel and Nazi Germany are quite common, and antisemetic to the core.
In addition, the “Israel is a racist state” theme has made traditional antisemitism more common and acceptable (the catalyst(?)). We’ve discussed them recently – the “Jewish” lobby and power. Almost 55% of Spaniards believe that Jews have too much influence in financial markets. Almost 50% of Spaniards have a “negative opinion of Jews”. And what did Zapateros say about the Holocaust?
“At times one can even understand that there might be people who could justify the Holocaust.”.
As far as I know, the Guardian hasn’t supported a boycott of Israel either, but they certainly have no qualms about pushing the idea (holding a gun to Israel’s head – I know how much you like that phrase) through their columnist like Neve and Seth etc.
This has all been hammered into the public by the left wing media and academia and left wing political organizations. Europe as a hole has mainstreamed their hatred of Israel. Some have called this the Palestinianization of Europe. This is just not found to this degree in the US and Canada.
Thanks
November 26, 2009 at 3:11 pm
HairShirt
pretzelberg, it’s about context isn’t it?
The drip, drip, drip of anti-Israel/anti-Jewish smear and innuendo (and incidentally, EdwardRice’s record on antisemitic posts is far from clean) creates a foetid environment in which yet more hatred flourishes and is fed.
And frankly whether or not you think a remark is antisemitic is hardly relevant, since you still post to a blog which allows antisemitism below the line having provided the perfect breeding ground for it above the line. Whatever you are doing to try to minimise it there is plainly not working, is it?
In other words, the smell of antisemitism pervades CiF whether it is written there or not (and given the increasing expression of it below the line it may be only a matter of time before it is written above the line).
The beginning of the normalisation of antisemitism and its increasing inclusion in public discourse began with the likes of CiF’s focus on Israel as a racist state.
The delegitimisation of Israel as a Jewish state, the demonisation of her people and the persistent and consistent application of double standards to her is commonplace on CiF.
This is racist and discriminatory and, since much of the discourse uses antisemitic tropes – I give you the notion of a scheming powerful Israel lobby which could have been lifted straight out of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion – it is antisemitic too.
November 26, 2009 at 3:14 pm
HairShirt
TomWonacott – “….Europe as a hole… ???
Did you mean to write that or was it a Freudian slip?
Whatever was the case, I can understand why you wrote it.
November 26, 2009 at 3:52 pm
TomWonacott
HairShirt
It was definitely a Freudian slip. When I noticed it (soon after I posted), I cracked myself up. By the way, your comment was right on the money.
November 26, 2009 at 5:18 pm
pretzelberg
TomWonacott
- “if a poll shows that “more than 50 percent of Germans equate Israel’s policies toward the Palestinians with Nazi treatment of the Jews”, that’s a troubling statistic. Symbolic comparisons of Israel and Nazi Germany are quite common, and antisemetic to the core.”
Great – so you’re saying that 50% of the German population are anti-Semitic to the core.
Congratulations.
November 26, 2009 at 6:41 pm
Israelinurse
The point is, Pretzelberg, that there should be zero tolerance for anti-Semitism or any other kinds of racism or bigotry. And if the world didn’t learn that after WW2, then there is obviously a real need for anyone who can to shine a searchlight on racism and bigotry to do so. We will not eradicate the stain of anti-Semitism by saying ‘Oh, it’s only those people saying it’ or ‘ it’s only that fringe publication’. I don’t care who or how many or where – it is never excusable or explainable.
November 27, 2009 at 1:45 am
Margie
“There should be zero tolerance for anti-Semitism”.
In a day and age when we are so aware of political correctness surely the kind of posting examined here every day,making generalisations about Jews and Israelis, slamming them for the way they behave without justification, making assumptions based on zero knowledge should be considered anathema in a decent newsite. However the Guardian does not seem to require its moderators to remove postings that contravene these general rules unless urged to do so.
Report these postings for abuse and they will sometimes be removed – reluctantly at times it seems after some hours have passed and they have spread their poison already.
Compare this to a mention of a member of the Guardian staff where the comment will be removed very efficiently with no need to wait for a report – proving that the entries are read but that standards are not applied.
This is the kind of atmosphere in which anti-Semitism thrives. When the news is always presented from the point of view of Israel’s enemiesl, when people feel that nudge nudge wink wink we can say what we like about Israel and the person next to us will probably agree, we are living in a toxic, racist atmosphere.
November 27, 2009 at 8:11 pm
pretzelberg
@ Israelinurse
“there should be zero tolerance for anti-Semitism or any other kinds of racism or bigotry”
100% agree.
“We will not eradicate the stain of anti-Semitism by saying ‘Oh, it’s only those people saying it’ ”
Likewise agree.
But I think it was you who recently went OTT re. alleged anti-Semitism in the Dispatches programme.