Comments on: Guardian World View in Action on the Ben White Thread http://cifwatch.com/2009/09/27/guardian-world-view-in-action-on-the-ben-white-thread/ Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:54:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Mita http://cifwatch.com/2009/09/27/guardian-world-view-in-action-on-the-ben-white-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-2135 Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:56:33 +0000 http://cifwatch.com/?p=1529#comment-2135 Guardian Hates Jews: they are both still there, two days later.

]]> By: Guardian Hates Jews http://cifwatch.com/2009/09/27/guardian-world-view-in-action-on-the-ben-white-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-2134 Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:29:56 +0000 http://cifwatch.com/?p=1529#comment-2134 The Washington Institute for Near East Policy is a 501(c)(3) organization with no “quasi-governmental” “allegiance”. If the above posts rem ain on CiF, it will put a nail in the coffin of the Guardian’s already-soiled reputation as purveyor of “facts”.

]]> By: Mita http://cifwatch.com/2009/09/27/guardian-world-view-in-action-on-the-ben-white-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-2133 Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:50:14 +0000 http://cifwatch.com/?p=1529#comment-2133 Funny how there are special rules for those with Jewish names

======
The world can’t trust Iran
questionnaire’s comment 26 Sep 09, 5:28pm
Why is the Guardian allowing two hard-line Zionist authors who work for a Zionist quasi-governmental research organisation attached to the US government to write op-ed pieces on Cif?

Surely Cif is a forum for independent journalists offfering opinions, not Zionist quangos disseminating propaganda.

Recommended (35)

KrustytheKlown
26 Sep 09, 5:49pm

Why is the Guardian allowing two hard-line Zionist authors who work for a Zionist quasi-governmental research organisation attached to the US government to write op-ed pieces on Cif?

I’ve no problem with them being allowed to write here – it gives us the fun of taking them apart, after all! However, I do think that the institutional alleigance of the writers should be clearly indicated either at the start of at the end of the article. This is the usual procedure when a government or diplomatic offical writes for CiF, and should also be applied to individuals working for ‘thinktanks’ representing nation states.

]]> By: aficianado http://cifwatch.com/2009/09/27/guardian-world-view-in-action-on-the-ben-white-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-2130 Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:50:48 +0000 http://cifwatch.com/?p=1529#comment-2130 Use the bugger for kapparot.

]]> By: Demeter http://cifwatch.com/2009/09/27/guardian-world-view-in-action-on-the-ben-white-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-2127 Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:35:05 +0000 http://cifwatch.com/?p=1529#comment-2127 ChasNB, try not to be overly concerned, you are in good company. CiF is rather like a poor deluded person who gets very hot under the collar when anyone tries to challenge the delusions.

Among its delusions is that it is open-minded (??) about Israel and presents its readership with “the Truth” about the conflict. CiFWatch has shown that it does not. CiF is therefore going to very sensitive to criticism of some of its most accomplished haters and any posts which try to force it to reality test its biased attitude towards Israel are bound to be pulled because they wobble its reality.

Keep on doing it.

]]> By: Not Ben White's Dad http://cifwatch.com/2009/09/27/guardian-world-view-in-action-on-the-ben-white-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-2126 Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:00:57 +0000 http://cifwatch.com/?p=1529#comment-2126 What would daddy say?
http://www.alkmunds.org.uk/Index.php?page=Who's%20Who

]]> By: Not Georgina http://cifwatch.com/2009/09/27/guardian-world-view-in-action-on-the-ben-white-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-2108 Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:23:44 +0000 http://cifwatch.com/?p=1529#comment-2108 What is wrong with it is that it is rude about darling cherubic Ben

]]>