When the news broke on Friday that Iran had concealed the construction of an additional nuclear enrichment facility, CiF was quick to cover the story with an article by Simon Tisdall, who wrote:
Now it seems the Iranian regime has been caught red-handed, and clean out of trumps, by the forced disclosure that it is building, if not already operating, a second, secret uranium processing plant. The revelation will bring a triumphal roar of “told you so!” from Bush era neoconservatives in the US to hawkish rightwingers in Israel. The likes of former vice-president Dick Cheney and UN envoy John Bolton, and the current Israeli leader, Binyamin Netanyahu, have long insisted that Tehran’s word could not be trusted.
Yet the argument about who was right and who was wrong about Iran is hardly important at this juncture. Today’s disclosures have significant, real-time policy-shifting implications for those who must deal with the ever more believable claims that Iran is seeking nuclear weapons capability.
It’s only human that Tisdall wouldn’t like to dwell on the issue of “who was right and who was wrong about Iran”, since he works for a media outlet that has consistently given out the message that there is no reason to worry about Iran’s nuclear program, and that especially Israel’s fears were completely exaggerated, hysterical, paranoid, and, above all, bellicose.
In the parallel universe of the GWV, the threats against the Jewish state that Iran’s rulers have repeated over and over again are mere rhetoric, or mistranslations, and in any case hardly newsworthy – particularly when compared to the always justified concern about the terrible threat posed by Israel…
So it was hardly a surprise that a certain colleague of Tisdall was rather unhappy to read on CiF that Iran had been “caught red-handed” and that the revelations about the concealed nuclear facility could “bring a triumphal roar of ‘told you so!’ from Bush era neoconservatives in the US to hawkish rightwingers in Israel.” Heaven forbid – none of this could be truly true!!!
BrianWhit
25 Sep 09, 4:44pm
Staff
This smells of a propaganda stunt by western intelligence agencies. It’s not clear that Iran has actually broken any ruies on disclosure, since the plant is said to be non-operational.
Yeah, there must be a conspiracy…
Damage control was swift, if not outright frantic, and it came in the form of another post on the subject: “Keeping Iran honest”. Any reader who wondered if this title really implied that Iran had been honest while it was concealing the construction of a nuclear facility had all doubts removed by the subheading, which reads: “Iran’s secret nuclear plant will spark a new round of IAEA inspections and lead to a period of even greater transparency.”
Even greater transparency!!! OMG, how transparent can it get???
Once this piece was posted, Tisdall’s unfortunate column was quickly closed for debate. But it didn’t take long before yet another, even more tempting take on the story was posted: “My dinner with Ahmadinejad” gives the “human interest” angle of the story:
Iran is not thinking about specifics.
Instead it seeks something more diffuse: respect, dignity, treatment as an equal member of the world community. This is a country that has been abused, humiliated and looted by foreign powers for 200 years. As Ahmadinejad repeatedly made clear, this has left deep scars.
“We see the world differently from the way prominent politicians in the US see it,” he said at one point. Later he complained about big powers that “really believe they have a right to approach the world from a position of leadership, and insist that others follow them.” Then he said countries “have to recognise each other’s basic rights.”
CiF-readers are unlikely to know that this is the same man speaking who said last year:
“World powers have created a black and dirty microbe named the Zionist regime and have unleashed it like a savage animal on the nations of the region.”
That came shortly after the leader of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps, Muhammad Ali Jafari, wrote to Hizbullah leader Hassan Nasrallah:
“The cancerous growth Israel will soon disappear… I am convinced that with every passing day Hizbullah’s might is increasing and in the near future, we will witness the disappearance of this cancerous growth Israel by means of the Hizbullah fighters’ radiation [therapy].”
And the chief of the Iranian Armed Forces, Maj.-Gen. Hassan Firouzabadi, wholeheartedly agreed, writing that:
“Lebanese and Palestinian combatants… [will] continue the struggle until the complete destruction of the Zionist regime and the liberation of the entire land of Palestine.”
But according to the GWV, all Ahmadinejad really wants is a bit of respect, and according to the GWV, he deserves it, never mind what he and his lieutenants say…
In the end, however, the Guardian editors acknowledged in a piece posted early Saturday morning:
“The likelihood that Iran’s nuclear programme is wholly civilian, as its leaders continue to claim, diminishes with each unpleasant surprise.”
“Unpleasant”, indeed; “surprise” – only if you insisted to ignore the obvious about Iran’s regime.
Well, and let’s not forget, one reason why all this is so “unpleasant” is this:
Iran’s cat-and-mouse game with nuclear inspectors hands a propaganda victory on a plate to Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli premier who has made little secret of his air force’s preparations for a long-range air strike.
Right, that’s important to keep in mind: a regime that has repeatedly threatened to annihilate Israel is clearly pursuing nuclear weapons, and what is to be deplored is that this “hands a propaganda victory on a plate to Binyamin Netanyahu”. What a Guardianesque thought…






9 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 26, 2009 at 11:16 am
Hawkeye
“This smells of a propaganda stunt by western intelligence agencies. It’s not clear that Iran has actually broken any ruies on disclosure, since the plant is said to be non-operational.”
I wonder which western intelligence agencies Brian precisely means.
September 26, 2009 at 12:07 pm
Mita
Maimon: nice dissection
——–
And the chief of the Iranian Armed Forces, Maj.-Gen. Hassan Firouzabadi, wholeheartedly agreed, writing that:
“Lebanese and Palestinian combatants… [will] continue the struggle until the complete destruction of the Zionist regime and the liberation of the entire land of Palestine.”
——-
Despite their open admissions our colleagues on CiF continue to be certain that
“Let us ask the author of this editorial how many times Iran has attacked its neighbours in recent history.
I count at least three. The bombing in Buenos Aires. Iran’s support for the terrorists in Iraq. Iran’s support for the Taliban in Afghanistan.”
——-
and others brush even that aside because of Buenos Aires distance from Iran – obviously Iranians have not yet learned about air travel according to these excusers.
September 26, 2009 at 12:12 pm
Mita
Jews/Madoff/Israelis – all out of the same pot for almart000
—-
almart000
26 Sep 09, 3:07pm (about 2 hours ago)
Elena:
Funny how people throughout history have always assumed the Jews had much more power and control then they really do. Funny also how the Jews have had a history of being persecuted. Could the two be linked???
—–
So you’re suggesting AIPAC has no power in DC then? Or are you saying that even if they do, to question that means Jews are being persecuted? So wait – can we therefore say that Bernie Madoff was a victim of persecution cause he was Jewish and got caught stealing? And therefore are you suggesting that Jews should be immune to any form of investigation since, well, that would be de facto persecution?
Not sure where your logic ends, but probably nowhere good.
Personally, I’d rather not have my child’s life made hostage to Israel’s greater needs: I don’t live in Israel, I live in a democratic country, and if I choose to question the motives of the media – as I did when the Israeli-owned media decided to print lies such as Saddam had WMD – then I will do precisely that without being labelled, thanks very much. My ancestors fought for my right to question: And I won’t have that taken away by shit that happened 80 years ago in a place far far away.
This Iranian thing is nothing more than Isreal and what she wants – and that is, neighbours who cower before her. And you know what? Fuck that – the days of that nonsense is over. If Israel wants to wave 400 nukes over the ME, it is no surprise others want to do similar. And the sooner Iran gets the bomb, the better the world will be.
—-
So his broad knowledge even includes precisely how many nukes Israel has.
September 26, 2009 at 12:45 pm
sababa
Mita, of course this poster you quote has broad knowledge — after all she/he reads the “Israeli-owned media”!!! That’s one example of what Mark Gardner was talking about in his post: that some people get all confused about how and when to say “Israel” or “Zionists” when they want to hide the Jew-hatred that motivates them.
September 26, 2009 at 12:55 pm
cityca
Its been clear for some while, that we are in the middle of a third world war. Its relatively low level at the moment but perhaps won’t be for long.
It was declared on 9/11 – the forces of militant Islam declared their intention to wage war on the west, and it’s continued in various forms ever since. The various terrorist activities around the globe are part of the war – the 7/7 bombings in London, the bombings of the Madrid railway have slowly awakened western governments to the reality that like it or not, they are as involved as Israel and the US.
Aside from the Wahabi in Saudi Arabia, Iran is one of the principal sponsors and trainers of this terrorist warfare worldwide. They are deeply involved in Iraq and Afghanistan and almost certainly in Pakistan. Many NATO force casualties are largely the result of Iran’s training and supply to the Taliban of improvised explosive devices.
In Lebanon, Iran via Syria is training, arming and sponsoring Hez B’Allah and helping them to become further politically established in that fragile country.
In Gaza, Hamas too receive arms, training and sponsorship from Iran, and no doubt instructions too.
The knee jerk reaction of the left on CiF is to defend Iran against the ‘neocon tendency’ of we Western Democrats by suggesting as Brian Whit did that its all a conspiracy, whereas the evidence above, plus the ravings of Ahmedinejad regarding Israel and Jews, is not simply provocative, its downright threatening and warlike.
To continue to make excuses for the Iranian regime as part of the Guardian World View, just exposes the G’s naivety, stupidity or just bloody mindedness. Socialist, Gays, Christians and Jews are the first target of militant Islamists. Brian Whit as a journalist for a left wing news organisation would be a prime target for the active service proxies of Iran.
I read and hear numerous useful idiots bemoan the ‘fact’ that Israel has a nuclear capability. Leaving aside that has never properly been established, even if it were true, I’m not aware of it using or threatening to use that capability, other than if its very existence was threatened – i.e. as a weapon of last resort.
Iran on the other hand, is not only making a lot of noise about its desire for nuclear ‘energy’, despite of having one of the world’s largest reservoirs of natural gas, but at the same time is pursuing an active and aggressive policy towards the west, being astonishingly provocative towards Israel and not least, frightening the life out of Arab states who fear it has ambitions to lead the Islamic world.
When the Arab League view Israel as less of a threat than Iran, its surely time to ignore a commentator like Whit’s comments about a propaganda stunt or conspiracy.
September 26, 2009 at 4:19 pm
Twitter Trackbacks for There Must be a Conspiracy « [cifwatch.com] on Topsy.com
[...] There Must be a Conspiracy « cifwatch.com/2009/09/26/there-must-be-a-conspiracy – view page – cached September 26, 2009 in Uncategorized | Tags: Antisemitism, Brian Whitaker | by Maimon — From the page [...]
September 26, 2009 at 4:38 pm
armaros
But he never denied the Holocaust.
-It was a mis-translation of the word “holocaust”.
- no it was a mis-translation of the word “myth”
…but he called it a great lie….
-No no, that was a mis-translation of the word “lie”.
But he repeated that he denied the holocaust and was even proud of it!
Oh come on that is racist. Only white people saw that as pride, the rest of the world sees this as a yearning for respect.
But he again denied it on Larry King.
-No he just denied Palestinians had nothing to do with it.
But he refused to answer the question do you or don’t you believe it happened.
-why always these western centric questions? Why not focusing on more pressing issues? Why treat a head of state like this with annoying entrapping questions?
But he denies the holocaust!
- no he just said more research is needed
But Bibi brought the research in himself!
-No no you cannot sit and listen to a war criminal
He is an antisemitic fanatic.
-No he wants peace with the Jewish people. THe Jews of Iran support him
No they don’t how can you be sure?
-They said so, are you calling the Jews of Iran liars? Do they all have to toe the Imperialist Zionist line?
But he denies the holocaust !!
-How do you know that? You speak Farsi? How do you say deny in Farsi?
He said the holocaust was a myth and a lie!
-But myths and lies occupy a different reality in different culture, how can you be so insensitive?
He denies the holocaust and said Israel should be wiped off the map!!
-No he did not. He said wiped off from the pages of history by a referendum of the peoples of the world, You despise democracy ?
You deny it to little brown people? You re a racist.
September 26, 2009 at 7:04 pm
AKUS
The only honest part of the article ” “Keeping Iran honest” was, in fact, the header. There has to be a determined effort to keep Iran honest, though one doubts that that word has any meaning for the the leaders of that unfortunate country.
The header was followed by the usual twists and turns intended to show that no matter what Ahminajad says, or his regime does, its all a mistranslation, or misunderstanding, or everyone else in the world doesn’t understand the rules or what is going on here:
“Beware politically motivated hype. While on the surface, Obama’s dramatic intervention seemed sound, the devil is always in the details. “
So what are the details?
Ah .. Iran isn’t breaking the rules because … it never signed up for the rules:
“The “rules” Iran is accused of breaking are not vague, but rather spelled out in clear terms. … Iran is obliged to inform the IAEA of any decision to construct a facility which would house operational centrifuges … This agreement was signed by Iran in December 2004. However, since the “additional protocol” has not been ratified by the Iranian parliament, and as such is not legally binding, Iran had viewed its implementation as being voluntary, and as such agreed to comply with these new measures as a confidence building measure more so than a mandated obligation”.
So we should not prosecute nor penalize a criminal if the criminal has not signed a contract saying that he will not commit “clearly spelled out crimes” … another fascinating insight into what is laughingly referred to as “International Law”.
This would be incredible if we did not remember historical precedents such as the attempt by the crazy left to show that when the USSR signed up with the fascists to destroy Poland under the terms of the Molotov-Ribbentrop agreement it was objectively the right thing to do … only on the Guardian … and perhaps the Iranian press.
September 27, 2009 at 8:52 am
BannedFromCiF
This Brian Whit character is just beyond words. The chief editor on the middle east, I believe? And he accuses this story as being a western conspiracy.
I’m dumbfounded. I don’t know whether I should laugh, cry, or puke. Is this a journalist? or a clown?