This is a guest post by Jonathan Hoffman
Benny Weinthal and Eric Lee have an excellent article on CiF today about last week’s UK TUC (British trade union federation) decision to endorse a selective boycott of Israeli goods and a selective divestment from Israeli (and other) companies. They argue that the TUC should have acted against Iran, not Israel.
The one problem with this argument is that it leaves Weinthal and Lee open to the argument that the TUC should have acted against both Iran and Israel.
The truth is that the TUC’s action against Israel should never have happened, since Israel has done nothing to deserve it. It was taken on false premises.
To appreciate this, just look at the one-sidedness of the statement which announced the TUC’s action. There is no reference to the reason why Israel went into Gaza in January – namely, eight years of rocket attacks on its civilian population. I don’t remember the TUC ever objecting when Britain bombed German cities during World War Two in order to defeat the Nazis. What’s the difference?
Au contraire, the TUC refers to “Israeli military aggression and the continuing blockade of Gaza”. How can acting to defend your citizens be “aggression”?
And if you look at the casualty figures in Gaza, they also put the lie to the charge of “aggression”. While males over age 15 make up approximately 25 percent of the Gaza population, they made up over 74 percent of the fatalities.
And there is no blockade of Gaza. The reason Israel maintains checks on the movement of goods into Gaza is for security, so that materials which can be used by Hamas for terror cannot enter.
Then the TUC calls on the British government to end arms sales to Israel. But if Israel has the right to defend itself, how can an arms embargo be justified?
The TUC calls on the British Government to seek EU agreement to impose a ban on the importing of goods produced in the ‘illegal’ settlements and to support moves to suspend the EU-Israel Association Agreement. But there is simply no legal decision on the status of the settlements – so they cannot be termed ‘illegal’. The US government for one does not hold that they are illegal.
And so the TUC’s ignorant rhetoric continues……
To increase the pressure for an end to the Israeli occupation of Palestinian Territories, and the removal of the separation wall and the illegal settlements, we will support a boycott ….. of those goods and agricultural products that originate in illegal settlements – through developing an effective, targeted consumer-led boycott campaign working closely with the Palestine Solidarity Campaign – and campaign for disinvestment by companies associated with the occupation as well as engaged in building the separation wall.
No recognition by the TUC that successive Israeli governments have shown willingness to trade land (taken in a defensive war) for peace. Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005 and Sinai in 1982. No recognition as to why the separation fence was built and how it has saved lives, because it has prevented suicide bombers entering Israel – would the TUC prefer to have seen more maimed and dead victims?
The truth is that trade union members of Unite, Unison, the Fire Brigade Union and the GMB – some of the unions whose executives were pushing for action against Israel – were never consulted about the matter. The one occasion when a union was forced to consult its members resulted in overwhelming opposition to a boycott (the Association of University Teachers in 2005, voting on an academic boycott).
In the matter of Israel, the UK trade unions have been hijacked by the hard Left. Since the collapse of communism, the hard Left has been bereft of a cause. In addition it is facing the prospect of a long period of Labour in opposition. Israel – more precisely the false analogy of Israel with apartheid South Africa – gives it a cause.
PS: My comment welcoming the article and pointing out that no union has balloted its members was deleted without trace. But this comment remains – with 62 recommends, so far:
lalibella
23 Sep 09, 2:12pm
I support whatever action British trade unions can take to oppose the racist, apartheid policies of this disgraceful Israeli government



16 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 24, 2009 at 12:39 am
CIFDisgustsMe
But this comment remains – with 62 recommends, so far:
A very poignant example of how CI(F) uses its laughingly called ‘Moderation’ policy to tip the discourse when it doesn’t like the way that a thread is going.
My moniker says it all.
September 24, 2009 at 4:33 am
Mita
JHoffman: And there is no blockade of Gaza. The reason Israel maintains checks on the movement of goods into Gaza is for security, so that materials which can be used by Hamas for terror cannot enter.
————–
I beg to differ. There definitely is a blockade. Luxury items don’t get through. They have no security value at all.
September 24, 2009 at 5:03 am
Joywo
By referring to the fact that “luxury items don’t get through” Mita is actually helping to prove that there IS no blockade, as this specifically confimrs that other essential items do get through.
There aredetailed daily lists of the thousands of tons of supplies that go through on a regular daily basis, and also pictorial evidence of well stocked shops in Gaza.
There are also many Gazans who travel into Israel for medical treatment.
Where there is a blockade is from Egypt, and it is about time there was a free flow of help into Gaza from the Arab countries who showabsolutley no interest in helping their Palestinian brethren. The main reason Egypt keeps the border well sealed is to ensure no Palestinians seek a haven in Egypt. But that does not explain why the Egyptians shoot at Darfur refugees on the border.
September 24, 2009 at 5:37 am
Jonathan Hoffman
http://www.workersliberty.org/story/2009/09/22/help-palestinians-solidarity-not-boycott
http://thecst.org.uk/blog/?p=616
Mark Gardner on the CST blog writes about the excellent response by “Workers Liberty” to the TUC decision. As Mark comments “Workers Liberty understands antisemitism as a living, breathing, kicking phenomenon in which Jews – including Zionist and Israeli Jews – are real people, with real rights, and real fears.”
Both articles are highly recommended.
September 24, 2009 at 6:22 am
Ariadne
This one made me splutter my coffee:
gondwanaland
23 Sep 09, 3:50pm (about 19 hours ago)
[Response to The Shermanator]
The day Arabs have unions will be a bad one for Israel/US.
That’s why they’re actively involved in the violent suppression of democracy in the region.
-
Are any moderators stalwarts of MPACUK?
September 24, 2009 at 6:28 am
Ariadne
And see what happened to the next Shermanator:
TheShermanator
23 Sep 09, 3:58pm (about 19 hours ago)
This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
September 24, 2009 at 7:02 am
AKUS
Excellent article, Jonathan.
It is interesting to see how many Brits complained on that thread about the TUC, and demanded that it confine itself to improving the lot of British workers rather than meddling in international politics.
The attempts by a few on the thread to praise the TUC and condemn the analysis by Benny Weinthal and Eric Lee another example of how far off-base the Guardian and its supporters are from the sane element of the British public.
In today’s Washington Post there is an article about the promotion of alternative energy (solar, primarily) in Spain as a source of job creation – there is an estimate that in Spain unemployment will rise to 19.3% next year. It does not take much thought to see a linkage between Spain’s fascination with condemning Israel and setting up kangaroo courts to ry Israelis as a tactic to draw attention away from its own problems.
Similarly. with the TUC – if they can not or will not do anything for employment in the UK, what better diversionary tactic than to follow historical precedent and — whip up hatred of the Jews.
September 24, 2009 at 7:50 am
peterthehungarian
I can’t believ it!
350 pounds punishment for a high ranking government official who publicly expressed his murderous hate of Jews and his wish to wipe them off…
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/sep/24/senior-diplomat-racial-harassment-case
Brits must be very proud of their legal system.
September 24, 2009 at 8:56 am
seismicshock
Thanks for this Jonathan. It’s reassuring to hear people didn’t actually vote for this, but worrying that certain people would sidestep democracy specifically to hurt Israel.
September 24, 2009 at 9:24 am
Louise
Peter
I agree it is a pathetic punishment
However he will almost certainly lose his job, and will find it hard to get another one
September 24, 2009 at 9:37 am
Chas N-B
Great article Jonathan.
September 24, 2009 at 10:16 am
peterthehungarian
Hi Louise
However he will almost certainly lose his job, and will find it hard to get another one
Tou are worrying withou reason.
I’m sure that he’ll have many job offers: in the media: PressTV, Guardian,
in the UN HRC, UNRWA, in politics TUC, Respect etc.
September 24, 2009 at 12:21 pm
John Brown
Never fear – Freedman is on the case … he seems to have a problem with anti-Semitism expressed by others … I notice, however, he doesn’t refer to “that vile disease coursing through British veins” or similar epithets he reserves for Israelis.
September 24, 2009 at 12:44 pm
Demeter
Jonathan, thanks for this.
Do you happen to know how many TUC members actually voted in favour of this? For example, did the TUC ballot all its membership?
I ask because I seem to remember that a pathetically small number of UCU members voted in favour of their motion to boycott Israeli academics and that the UCU membership as a whole was not balloted (although I stand to be corrected if I have that wrong).
September 24, 2009 at 1:13 pm
Gerald
Demeter to answer your question. The TUC as such does not have any members it is the individual Unions who have the membership. As a former Full Time Union Official I can tell you that the individual Union Delegations would have decided whether to support or oppose any motion at the Conference. It is possible that individual Unions may have discussed this and other issues at their own Delegate Conferences with the decision taken by the Delegates at their own Union Conference, but, I would be very surprised to hear of any Union that has balloted the individual members to seek their views.
Sadly what we have seen at this years TUC is the continued decline in size and influence of the ‘Heavy’ industry and Manufacturing Unions who traditionally would have voted this Resolution down.
September 24, 2009 at 1:40 pm
Jonathan
Demeter
UCU members have never been balloted about a boycott of Israeli academics.
The predecessor union of UCU was AUTE. As I say in my article, their Constitution obliged them to ballot, if enough members called for a ballot after an Executive decision. That is what happened in 2005, and at the EGM of AUTE in 2005 the majority against a boycott was reportedly 4 to 1 (the numbers were never announced). I was outside the meeting hall and it was clear from talking to AUTE members that there was a heavy majority against a boycott.