One of the most prevalent problems with ‘Comment is Free’ is that CiF moderators often delete posts simply because they disagree with the pro-Israeli views expressed there. For the poster it causes much frustration at having taken the time to write a comment only to have it deleted and it leaves anti-Israel and, worse still, antisemitic positions on the thread unchallenged.
The following is a list of instructions that you might want to follow before you press the <Post Comment> button on CiF.
1. Open up Notepad, MS Word or any other word processor document ready to copy/paste your post to.
2. Copy/paste the post directly from the text box provided by CiF BEFORE you press the <Post Comment> button.
3. If the comment appears on the thread, copy/paste it from the thread itself instead of the ‘raw text’ in the previous step (make sure to include the time of the post and name of poster). [Note that if you are pre-moderated (you do not receive advance warning about this) it is important to follow step #2 before posting a comment - if you do not there is no way of retrieving your post once you click <Post Comment>].
4. Save the document with a name that you will easily recognize in the future to locate the document. This repository document can easily be used to store a large number of your comments.
5. Post the deleted comment on a relevant comment thread at CiF Watch or simply email us a copy of the deleted comment at contactus@cifwatch.com for consideration.
58 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 3, 2009 at 7:18 am
Ariadne
I like that idea. I’ve just looked through comments on the Rivka Carmi article and AKUS seems to have been totally silenced.
September 3, 2009 at 7:47 am
AKUS
Ariadne – yes, I’m afraid my oppostion to the howling lynch mob calling for Rivka Carmi’s head was more than the Guardian could tolerate. Possibly my reference to the mob as reminiscent of crowds gathered by the guillotine did the trick, and for a while I’ll have to sit things out.
Not a bad thing altogether – the increase in anti-Israeli invective, anti-Semitic comments thinly masked as pleas for academic freedom, endless postings of faked “quotes” attributed to Ben Gurion and others, etc. were taking up more time than I can afford in efforts to refute them
That thread was the worst I have seen since Freedman accused the parents of the just murdered Habad Rabbi in Mumbai of being Rottweilers, which, I thing, set the bottom of the pit for CIF, though the comments on the Carmi thread come close.
So, in the spirit of this blog, here is a comment from the Loach thread which was deleted (after my first brief , deleted, message comparing boycotting film festivals to the grand old tradition of burning books by Jewish authors). I leave the gentle readers to wonder why, and perhaps consider where boycotts will lead to:
———–
I am fascinated to see how hard my brief and only previous comment on this thread hit home, and therefore was deleted.
Let me rephrase it and see if the truth can can survive
Throughout the centuries, one of the first symptoms of rabid anti-Semitism has been a call to burn Jewish writings.
This activity goes back to before the Inquisition, and culminates most recently by the statement by Farouk Hosni, who has served as Egypt’s culture minister since 1987, was seriously nominated to head UNESCO, and who has declared that if he could, he “would burn Israeli books in Egyptian libraries.” http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1088178.html . (He retracted the comment in an unavailing bid to try to save his candidacy).
Of course, my earlier comment was no doubt deleted because everyone remembers the famous book-burnings by Nazis, including, no less, the works of Einstein. What the readers of this blog and whoever deleted that one-line comment should be thinking about is the consequences of that act and remember that it did not start, and did not end, with the Nazis.
What I said, and stand by, is that the attempt to boycott a film festival because it shows Israeli films, or has financial support from Israel, is the modern equivalent of the centuries old business of burning books by Jewish authors.
Rather than deleting this comment, consider it carefully.
What starts with burning books (or boycotting films) written by or made by or supported by Jews will spread like an evil cancer to devour those very people who support these actions. It spreads to include all writings (and in our times, will include films) made by Jews or non-Jews alike, wherever there is someone with the power to decide which are “describable”, and which are not.
The historical trail is extremely well-marked.
September 3, 2009 at 7:49 am
Mita
Ariadne: Not one voice supporting Dr Carmi was left undeleted on the first page – not that there were many. That any have remained at all probably means that the duty mod has put his feet up and is having his mid-morning nap.
September 3, 2009 at 7:59 am
Ariadne
Mita
Am I quoting if I say “Have they no shame?”
At least I’m getting to know whose comments to just let slide by.
That so far is most of them.
September 3, 2009 at 8:12 am
Demeter
I find myself wondering where they find these mods. Is there a sort of central casting for moderators? I am almost certain that Freedman moderators his own threads, in spite of protestations to the contrary when I asked (and then got deleted of course for daring to ask the question) because of the swiftness with which any comments which criticise his views get pulled. (If he doesn’t do his own modding he probably threatens to do a Violet Elizabeth Bott and “thcream and thcream until he’s sick” or sue them, or wheel in his family if the posts are not pulled).
WellofSense, how far back do you want to go as regards deleted posts?
September 3, 2009 at 8:20 am
Ariadne
I picked up a nice deleted one from JOHNQPUBLIC:
JOHNQPUBLIC
For the rest of you: Blah Blah Blah occupation; blah blah blah ethnic cleansing; blah blah blah apartheid, blah, blah
AKUS: They just seem to hate knowledge and truth.
September 3, 2009 at 9:01 am
Demeter
AKUS said (on CiF and now here): “…What I said, and stand by, is that the attempt to boycott a film festival because it shows Israeli films, or has financial support from Israel, is the modern equivalent of the centuries old business of burning books by Jewish authors…
And he has hit the nail squarely on the head.
AKUS, what then does that say about the deletion of pro-Israel posts by CiF (which to all intents and purposes may well mean “Jewish” posts to them)? Has your analogy equivalence to that?
I am sorry that your have been premoderated at “the other place.” Your posts have always been interesting and to the point and thought-provoking, like pieces of gold in the dross which is often found there.
Perhaps the editors can ask you to write here?
September 3, 2009 at 11:26 am
CIFDisgustsMe
Great ideas.
These will be a kick up the arse for the laughingly called ‘moderating policy’ of CI(F).
September 3, 2009 at 6:32 pm
steve.g
Here’s a prime example of trolling.
Who are Shactman’s freinds with hatchet in hand ? Has he/they bothered LaRitournelle in any way ? NO.
Even ExiledLondoner get uncomfortable but only a tad.
Has anyone mentioned, hysterically or other wise the author having been boycotted by CIF ? Is any of this on topic ? NO.
Has this nasty piece of work been removed like the good Talk Policy dictates? NO.
Is she being encouraged to start flame fests between different groups on selected threads ? Looks like it.
LaRitournelle
03 Sep 09, 8:51pm (about 2 hours ago)
JohnQ:
LARIT– Withdrawal of assistance to Israel? I’d recommend not holding your breath because that won’t be happening.
I don’t suspect for one minute that that would be the case, given the Obama inheritance, I would pretty much say that, for the time being, there’ll be no let-up in the military ‘aid’ to Israel. One argues on these issues, not because it is futile, nor because one holds a deep-seated hatred. One argues merely to prove (as my learned friend said to me the other day) some of us, at least, refuse to accept the proffered reality of a given situation.
Shactman:
Is that the voice of the Lonesome Pine I hear? or is that Riccardo o’Wines putting in his two penneth-worth this evening?
Seems like you and your mates like nothing better than to dig up a hatchet, re-hash it to fit thine own disordered reality and then try to re-bury it in other posters’ heads.
La Rit
exiledlondoner
03 Sep 09, 9:59pm (about 1 hour ago)
La Rit,
Is that the voice of the Lonesome Pine I hear? or is that Riccardo o’Wines putting in his two penneth-worth this evening?
I think he was taking the piss out of me – a perfectly respectable occupation.
Seems like you and your mates like nothing better than to dig up a hatchet, re-hash it to fit thine own disordered reality and then try to re-bury it in other posters’ heads.
Lighten up – he was joking. We could probably do with a bit more of that round here. Not all of us see everyone on the other side with horns and a tail (apologies to any posters who are indeed so afflicted).
I’ll let you in on a little secret – when I said that I was almost missing Petra, I kind of expected it to come back…..
LaRitournelle
03 Sep 09, 10:29pm (50 minutes ago)
ExiledLondoner:
Not all of us see everyone on the other side with horns and a tail (apologies to any posters who are indeed so afflicted).
he-he-he ;-)
Sadly for our Riccardo Shactman, his ‘jokes’ have a nasty habit of turning into malicious, unfounded, chinese whispers.
Lighten up
I am lightened-up by your presence Exiled!
btw – Next time you venture onto the grubby soil of Albion’s shore, you will be the honoured beneficiary of one of my famous roast dinners (vegetarian option available)
Cheers!
La Rit x
PS I’m glad Petra’s back too, it’ll put paid to the hysterical righteous indignation flowing from some quarters that she’s been ‘banned’ from contributing!
September 3, 2009 at 6:51 pm
Jacob
Fairplay
“Go and play with yourself, exiledlondoner. You’re a stupid moron.”
Will this stop him being stupid or a moron or both?
————————————————————————————–
Can I also add that you back-up the saved comments just in case the machine crashes and all data is wiped off.
I do a back up once a month.
September 3, 2009 at 8:24 pm
Brian
LaRitournelle #Seems like you and your mates like nothing better than to dig up a hatchet, re-hash it to fit thine own disordered reality and then try to re-bury it in other posters’ heads.#
LaRitournelle #Seems like you and your mates like nothing better than to dig up a hatchet, re-hash it to fit thine own disordered reality and then try to re-bury it in other posters’ heads.#
LaRitournelle #Sadly for our Riccardo Shactman, his ‘jokes’ have a nasty habit of turning into malicious, unfounded, chinese whispers.#
LaRitournelle #PS I’m glad Petra’s back too, it’ll put paid to the hysterical righteous indignation flowing from some quarters that she’s been ‘banned’ from contributing!#
#ExiledLondoner Not all of us see everyone on the other side with horns and a tail (apologies to any posters who are indeed so afflicted).#
LaRitournelle #he-he-he ;-)#
Is she or is she not unequivocally vile ?
September 3, 2009 at 8:37 pm
AKUS
Demeter – just “tuning in” in the evening to see what’s going on – at work, “social” sites like CW are blocked by our IT department.
I’ve always been ambivalent about the idea of moderation – free speech and all that – but when you see the disgusting comments on the Rivka Carmi thread, which amount to a verbal pogrom launched against her by a howling mob, you feel that moderation may be a good thing.
Of course, on CIF they moderate the decent people and leave these latter-day Cossaks to continue their pogrom.
The flip side is that leaving these anti-Semitic turds there to be picked up, sniffed, and tossed away has its merits as well. It brings the issue of anti-Semitism into the light instead of keeping it under wraps. In this case, these disgusting posters were wrapping the hatred in the guise of “academic freedom” and, of course, of the tired, hackneyed old “ethnic cleansing”/”apartheid”/yada yada/ accompanied by a faked quote attributed to Ben Gurion (my letter to Matt Seaton seems to have worked – it was removed).
There seems to be a coordinated set of “talking points” being used by three or four of the posters there – for example, the latest is “I don’t know how the palestinians have coped for 50 years of occupation – I weep, I really do”, when, of course, its more like 40 years, and they have coped very well, since until the intifada their standard of living only improved and was vastly better than in the countries surrounding israel.
So those still posting should look out for the coordinated group – namokel, moron, berchmans, allobragh, papgali, talknic, Dotty, Larit (my spellchecker wants to turn that into “latrine)- and point out the use of these talking points.
Thanks for the compliments – perhaps just for fun you need to start a “bring back AKUS ” campaign – they’ll really love that over there!!
September 3, 2009 at 8:40 pm
Jacob
Hey
What happend to Exilelondoner’s comments?
I wanted respond to him and its appears they have vanished into cyber space.
Please dont tell me the guardian mods are moonlighting here also.
September 3, 2009 at 8:47 pm
Clive
The moderators are taking the piss, Brian. They obviously agree or thinks it’s all terribly entertaining to have “Shactman and his friends” being described as having “disorded realities” for having dared to make a joke with ExiledLondonoer, all Shactman wrote this
03 Sep 09, 7:30pm (about 6 hours ago)
Welcome Back Petra (exiled’s been pineing for you , but go easy on him as he’s a bit out of practice ).
Comment is Free is seemingly proactive in their encouragement of LaRitournelle’s sheer nastiness since they haven’t bothered to delete those posts. It’s bloody obvious they want her to make these sneak attacks on particular people. I’ve just noticed one of her other posts is gone but not the ones you’ve brought up? Do they want her to start a free for all? Doesn’t look like anyone has bitten, everyone except ExiledLondoner have wisely ignored her. We’re finally learning not to rise to the bait.
Whatever our politics, it’s time for Jews and Israelis to get off that site until Comment is Free agree to stop treating us with this particular brand of contempt.
Pointless complaining, they ignore you. It’s a contemptible set up engineered to breaks tempers. Instead of giving them our time of day, lets give them our cold shoulder. Take our complaints directly to their advertisers, that might actually make a difference.
September 3, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Clive
oh dear, sorry about my appalling typing, everyone.
September 3, 2009 at 8:56 pm
Jacob
Clive
here, here
I agree with you.
September 3, 2009 at 9:05 pm
steve.g
Clive, as it happens, I can’t spell, friends, or get my fingers round my grammer. Hopefully, the point wont be lost, however.
Yes, Jacob, ExiledLondoners’ posts shouldn’t disapear unless they breach the sites rules. Finding his never ending excuses for CIF’s selective use of their own rules which allow LaRitournelle leeway they pounce on others for, can be positively tiresome but we can always ignore him if we choose.
September 3, 2009 at 9:20 pm
Jacob
Anyone know what happen to delightful Parisa?
I have not seen her on CIF for a long time.
Is she boycotting CIF?
September 3, 2009 at 9:29 pm
Clive
Steve, take it we’d both be done for if our daily bread depended upon our typing abilities.
If Comment is Free were serious about their Talk Policy, LaRitournelle would have been banned well before now. We all know or have heard of someone who has been banned for next to nothing in comparison to that woman’s contemptible outpourings. Whether or not one agrees with Comment is Free’s, Talk Policy has never been the bone of contention. Most users agree to be bound by it on registering, it’s their actual selectivity in when applying it that get’s most peoples goat. Someone obviously likes the wretched creature.
Jacob, did you notice that the Bigman thread actually looked like it was on a debate forum before LaRitournelle made her entrance ? Who kicks off the personal attacks on many a Comment is Free, thread ? I thought that personal attacks were against Comment is Free’s Talk Policy? Do you think they’ll ever ban her for her persistance in spitting venom at other users, I don’t.
September 3, 2009 at 9:50 pm
Clive
Hold the phone, chaps. It looks as if, by sheer coincidence, naturally, the offending posts we’ve been looking at on here have just been removed. They didn’t remove them before, as it happens, they only removed one other post {can’t remember what that one was about, I was too stung by the hateful attacks in the posts Steve brought up} whilst completely ignoring the complaints about the posts in which her personal attacks were contained. Anyone taking bets her posts showing up here, much to everyone’s disgust, embarrassed CIF’s moderators ?
Does anyone think LaRitounelle has finally been banned for her vicious attacks on other users? Of course she hasn’t.
September 3, 2009 at 10:07 pm
Brian
Does anyone know that CIF has the ability to premoderate when they want to ? It isn’t only a question of why wont they ban LaRitournelle, it’s why they wont even premoderate her if they’re serious about protecting others from personal attacks of this nature. It isn’t as if it’s something LaRitournelle has only just taken to doing. She’s always been this dreadful.
#disorded realities# and accusing others of #a nasty habit of turning into malicious, unfounded, chinese whispers# She likes doing this sort of thing and CIF seem inclined to let her continue.
Clive there isn’t a cat in hells chance of CIF applying their TP seriously. LaRitournelle is a case in point.
Seems I’m the last of the night owls fraternity still awake, goodnight everyone.
September 4, 2009 at 1:53 am
CIFDisgustsMe
Clive.
Sort of justifies CIFWatch Commenters page where LaRits poison is preserved for prosperity.
Poor CIF.
Poor LaRit.
Life just isn’t fair.
September 4, 2009 at 3:46 am
Mita
The point about larit is that she has nothing much to say and says it in the nastiest most pointed fashion. I once responded to her and gained nothing from the experience. I have since abstained and feel better for it.
September 4, 2009 at 3:49 am
CIFDisgustsMe
Brian – Does anyone know that CIF has the ability to premoderate when they want to ?
I had my ‘dissappeared’ so I cannot post anymore.
I was pre-moderated a few times and during the premoderation periods, a lot of good comments from my part were disappeared into the nevereverlands. Others were posted eventually
I ‘wear’ this as a badge of excellence.
My comments were hard hitting and spot on. CIF uses its moderation policy to ‘tip the scales’.
Pity nobody thought of CIFWatch a long time ago.
I am contemplating a return to CIF taking the above advice to ‘cover’ myself . I somehow doubt that CIFDisgustsMe will be an acceptable moniker but I may try.
September 4, 2009 at 6:55 am
jubilation
letmeseenow is the latest incarnation in the talknic series
Johntheguardianite is banned
September 4, 2009 at 7:29 am
AKUS
Jubilation – wow!
So they nailed those two obssessives again.
I can never figure out exactly what it is about Dotty that gets him banned all the time, unless they are really slow in catching up with his multiple personalities and ban him for using mutiple personalities. But he is generally more tiresome than abusive, though in the end seems to explode in a tizzy of frustration. He always comes back he – can’t stay away and seems to have nothing else to do. Neither does that 63-year old alte kakker from Australia.
I use the term “multiple personalities” in a clinical sense, not just referring to LeonWells’ monikers – each time he takes on a new moniker (Edwardincognito/Countbernadotte [whence "Dotty"/kypriano]/LeonWells, etc.), he takes on a new persona. Although there is a trail of similarities in the style and content he does write as if he is, for example, a female Greek schoolteacher (Dotty), or a Bertie Wooster etc. He even posted a link to Famagusta when he was Dotty. But you can always “out” him when he starts in with his pandering “robust comment, sir!” /”that’s a corker, old chap” that seems to have been lifted from an overdose of childhood British comic reading or his references to three favorite hobby horses (Burg/Barenboim/Barghouti). Mind you, since the Palestinians tossed Barenboim out of Ramallah he has refrained from using that one.
I does make me wonder whether he is actually writing from an institution.
Talknic as interested1 seemed to have been rehabilitated – they may have simply found they couldn’t invest enough to keep server space free to contain his endless repetitive BS. Maybe others complained about it – it was like having an IED on the threads when he appeared.
September 4, 2009 at 8:08 am
jubilation
AKUS this new Talknic is the most extreme I have seen I think he is growing ever more exasperated. He took three and a half lines of mine and queried them at length. I didn’t read past the first few lines after I had identified him because we all know what is to come. Maps, borders, really Israel, it’s instead of its, Sderot is not in Israel…y…a….w…n….links, or source and go fetch…
I have no apprehension of the character you call Dotty but found him to be as sticky as an Israeli fly when I did encounter LeonWells
September 4, 2009 at 1:12 pm
Brian
LaRitournelle
04 Sep 09, 5:31pm (35 minutes ago)
#Petra among many others, is a wordsmith…..#
Lordie, how I wish someone would pursue this rotten egg through the courts, if she isn’t worth a smug bean, how about those who publish her ?
Shocking behaviour from the Guardian’s comment site.
September 4, 2009 at 1:59 pm
jubilation
Unbelievable letmeseenow has been banned and we have alternic in its place.
September 4, 2009 at 4:54 pm
AKUS
Jubiliation – the name “Dotty” was coined by some veterans to avoid having to keep track of the numerous monikers LeonWells, or recently, JohntheGuardianista”as you came you know him, has adopted. I doubt anyone can remember them all any more. He (and talknic) are obsessed – two lonely Israel haters adrift in an uncomprehending sea of support for Israel, except for the little desert island we know as CIF.
I took a look at Petra’’s article and the one about Fayad – both excellent – and noticed that letmeseenow is gone – no doubt already back as something else.
Interesting to see, as I think you among others point out, how bitter these anti-Semites on CIF (moron, acomol, etc.) are at the very thought that a Palestinian state might arise, and how they grasp at irrational straws in their hope that somebody – the US, the UN, the UK, Israel anybody – will prevent it happening so they do not lose the anti-Semitic figleaf they hide behind – Zionism as the source of all evils for the Palestinians.
September 4, 2009 at 5:51 pm
steve.g
I thought I’d share this howler in case any of you missed it.
Act 1. ‘LaRitournelle the Sage – an unintentional comedy of errors’
04 Sep 09, 9:58pm (34 minutes ago)
‘Hiya Petra:
You do realise I am paying you a compliment? I am not being cynical here. I don’t do cynical.
I’m just doing this in my own time, no-one pays me for my opinion!:
You talk about your husbands’ Father… your grandfather-in-law?’
===============
Who wants to tell the silly cow Petra’s husband’s father would be her father in law. Thick as two short planks.
September 4, 2009 at 5:53 pm
1peter
Petra has the patience of Job to be able to respond to these people.
September 4, 2009 at 6:16 pm
mita
That’s truly wonderful steve – so stupid she doesn’t know she is stupid.
Here is another: moron thought this was insulting the Palestinians:
Interesting isn’t it to see who pooh poohs the idea, clinging to the image of the Palestinians as weak kneed victims and Israel as the evil occupier.
tsimisces explained very nicely
September 5, 2009 at 2:37 am
iloathetheguardian
La Rit ,doesn’t do cynical,she does stupid instead.That woman fancies herself,
she, moeran, berchmans,and a few other CIF permanent fixtures,are as dumb as,but at least they provide some comic relief.
September 5, 2009 at 2:41 pm
Jubilation
AKUS I believe that your banning was unreasonable and unwarranted. I am wondering what we can do if anything, to get it rescinded.
I am prepared to write to Cif if you wish and to ask others to join me, in protest against it. I am prepared to ask them to giive us a solid reason according to their official FAQs for the banning.
My protest is far from altruistic because no matter how many bigots I was battling each time I saw you make an appearance I knew that there was a voice of sanity to steady me.
September 5, 2009 at 3:17 pm
Brian
If I were you AKUS, I’d ask CIF to explain why they’ve banned you. Try to get them to pinpoint the offending post, then if you would be so kind, could you let the rest of us know ?
September 5, 2009 at 3:19 pm
Jubilation
If anybody knows AKUS’s email please send him the above and then I would ask the editors to delete my posting
September 5, 2009 at 5:14 pm
Irish
Larit still there. Akus gone. Own goal cifwatch?
September 5, 2009 at 9:10 pm
Leon Wells
AKUS
‘This user profile is not available’…
After all these years — join the club, my old friend.
September 5, 2009 at 9:14 pm
Leon Wells
Brian
“If I were you AKUS, I’d ask CIF to explain why they’ve banned you.”
I think you’ll find that CiF has merely been watching CiF Watch…
September 6, 2009 at 1:37 am
JerusalemMite
I have just discovered that I am being pre-moderated.
Must have been when I answered Moeran with a link to his flash of fame as one of the odious commenters on CI(F).
It seems that CI(F) is not happy with anybody mentioning this site.
Not surprising really.
This site will ‘out’ them.
Well done.
September 6, 2009 at 1:45 am
Mita
JerusalemMite: Lovely name you have there. What a pity you are in pre-moderation. Mentioning this site might be considered treason at cif so people should be careful.
September 6, 2009 at 9:34 am
Clive
Notable that Elana24 was deleted from PMB’s thread. Could it be because she mentioned the possibility of Jews pulling off CIF altogether which caused CIF moderators to remove her so hastily ?
Any news on why AKUS was banned ? It will be interesting to compare AKUS’s grave breach of the hallowed Talk policy in comparison to LaRitournelle.
Irish, if that’s the sordid game you/CIF play then it is CIF which scored the own goal. They’ve just proven they’re everything this site accuses them of – being biased as well as being manipulated by a pack of trolls.
September 6, 2009 at 11:05 am
AKUS
Aha – my old fencing foil LeonWells, banned on CIF but welcome here, as he would be in the democracy called Israel, alerted me to the fact that there was some discussion of my banning here.
Just by the way – someone is occasionally posting under my moniker and I will do my best to alert this board when that happens – it would be nice if they can find a way to correctly identify fakes, but I imagine they need special software and the money to do it. I think “Irish” is being stalked and faked as well.
I think I was banned after posting on the Carmi thread for any of four reasons. It did not keep my posts so cannot be sure, and they, of course have vanished into the vaults of the Guardian’s servers. So, let’s play “you be the moderator” and take your pick of the following four possible “infringements of community standards”as a reason to ban someone:
a) I objected to the howling mob, which I compared to a crowd or lynch mob clustered around the guillotine calling for her head.
B) I wrote something about that thread exemplifying the worst of CIF’s tolerance for, and providing a home for, anti-Semites dressed up as anti-Zionists
c) I supported Carmi’s position
d) I complained about albagobragh’s use of a widely circulated fake quote attributed to BG claiming he supported ethnic cleansing but it took a direct letter to Seaton and Henry to get it removed, though my rebuttal had immediately been removed.
So, contestants – which was the reason for banning? I will make up a false moniker for the the winner to use and go back to post the answer on CIF.
September 6, 2009 at 12:18 pm
Clive
Thanks for that, AKUS. Clears things up a treat as far as I’m concerned.
CIF Watch, can we now have a discussion considering the merits of a boycott of Comment is Free, The Guardian, plus all and any products advertised by the Guardian and it’s so called, comment site ?
September 6, 2009 at 4:21 pm
Leon Wells
Yo, AKUS
So this is where you’re hanging out — I was waiting for you over yonder.
“Aha – my old fencing foil LeonWells, banned on CIF but welcome here, as he would be in the democracy called Israel, alerted me to the fact that there was some discussion of my banning here.”
Glad to be of service.
Yes, I did notice that a whole bunch of your posts were removed on the Rivka Carmi thread. I didn’t get to read ‘em before they went, but I have a sneaky feeling (you know, you just feel it in yer bones sometimes) that they were probably deemed as ‘trolling’.
So there we have it. You, my dear fellow, were probably jettisoned from the bad ship Commentisfree for persistent trolling.
Still, that’s just the way the internet propaganda war cookie crumbles.
Take care now — me old mucker.
September 6, 2009 at 4:42 pm
Leon Wells
AKUS
“Aha – my old fencing foil LeonWells, banned on CIF but welcome here, as he would be in the democracy called Israel, alerted me to the fact that there was some discussion of my banning here.”
Glad to be of service.
Unfortunately, I’m not as welcome as you make out. I come onto a thread entitled ‘Combating Biased Moderation’, I write a humorous post addressed to you, perfectly polite, offer a plausible explanation for your banning — and ironically it’s now gone, removed without trace. Perhaps they don’t know in New York City, that in Liverpool where I hail from, the phrase ‘me old mucker’ is a genuine term of endearment.
Anyway, bump into you again sometime.
September 6, 2009 at 4:43 pm
Leon Wells
I take that back — there’s my original post.
Well done, folks.
September 7, 2009 at 5:17 am
JerusalemMite
Leon Wells. You have lied on CI(F) when you were CountBernadotte.
Why should anyone accept in good faith anything that you write here?
September 7, 2009 at 6:22 am
Leon Wells
Ah, JerusalemMite
1) Did the commenter known as ‘CountBernadotte’ lie on CiF? You’re the accuser — the onus is on you to provide some evidence of this.
2) I don’t come here to be loved, so I’m not remotely concerned about being accepted.
3) Who are you when posting on CiF anyway — one of the highly aggressive Clapthehammer’s numerous incarnations?
September 7, 2009 at 8:36 am
Brian
JerusalemMite, don’t fee the trolls, particularly when they’re psychotic.
September 7, 2009 at 9:32 am
Leon Wells
Moderators
I don’t think it does your website any favours by allowing personal abuse to remain on the board. Allowing someone to refer to a fellow commenter as psychotic, is not good web practice.
Thank you.
September 7, 2009 at 10:24 am
SilverTrees
AKUS, too bad you have been banned. Your posts were always to the point and dealt with the arguments without gunning for the posters.
I believe you were banned as a last gasp idiotic effort by CiF against CiFWatch, which has rattled their moderators so much that they can no longer tell the difference between reasoned argument (which you invariably employ) and the vitriol spouted by LaRitournelle, who I note is still allowed to post there.
Keep posting here though, please
September 7, 2009 at 3:54 pm
Leon Wells
JerusalemMite
I did respond to your comment in detail, but unfortunately I fell foul of biased moderation. I also forgot to save my post before deletion. Ironic, don’t you think?
But yes, as you say — Shalom/Saalam/Peace
September 7, 2009 at 3:56 pm
Leon Wells
Oops — no…
There it is — sorry folks! (and thanks)
September 7, 2009 at 5:41 pm
Demeter
AKUS, hi
Your post at 4.45 – and the old lags of anti-Israel posters being bitter and twisted haters – yes I very much agree with you.
It has to be Israel for them; if they tried substituting Italy or China it just wouldn’t have the same zing would it, not least because that couldn’t justify the Jew-hatred.
I was appalled at some reactions to the building the Palestinian state thread – I honestly belief that most of these idiots would lose their raison d’etre if the Palestinian people finally said “Enough!” to their various corrupt leaders and asked for Israel’s help to build a state of their own.
In my lifetime I hope.
Incidentally, who the blazes has given E-numbers to Dotty/LeonWells? Please stop! He’s practically bouncing off the walls! Look at the number of posts from the silly b*gger.
September 7, 2009 at 10:47 pm
JerusalemMite
Look at the number of posts from the silly b*gger.
(Gasp.)
What dreadful language.
September 9, 2009 at 6:06 pm
Iloathetheguardian
Dotty mentioning reincarnations,he is on an eternal wheel of reincarnations.