If no-one can substantiate the allegations of anti-Semitism and “obsession with Jews” leveled at CiF commenter, LeonWells — perhaps the directors of this blog would be good enough to remove his name from the ‘watch list’.

Thank you.

But some seem to live a charmed life – berchman’s for example, hiding rabid anti-semitism under “humorous” protestations against calling anti-semites out – and never appearing till their comments are removed, so he can keep his virtual nose clean by requesting references to the anti-semitc comments that have akready been removed.

I have noticed that too.

However, I also noticed various posters mentioning that the are keeping personal records of Berchmans and presumably to circumvent CI(F) protectionism.

I personally regret never keeping Halgeel44′s comments about ‘Doctors with Jewish sounding names cutting up womens vaginae for huge amounts of money’. No record of these blatantly antisemitic comments can be found on the Guardian site yet she is still posting there. Most commenters seem to regard her as a great entertainer though.

She has this thing about ‘white skins’.

You touch on an important point – banned posters returning under new usernames. CIF Watch calls for some posters to be banned, but does that actually help?

For many posters, on both sides of the debate, banning is merely an opportunity to jettison their past posting history and start afresh – hardly much of a threat….

They are pretty ineffective anyway – Dotty resurfaces as Btselempaul, that tiresome 63-year-old alte-kakker from Australia is back as interested1, and no doubt there are others. But some seem to live a charmed life – berchman’s for example, hiding rabid anti-semitism under “humorous” protestations against calling anti-semites out – and never appearing till their comments are removed, so he can keep his virtual nose clean by requesting references to the anti-semitc comments that have akready been removed.

“You suck as a wind-up artist. You are just too primitive to finesses it. I know what you will say ten turns ahead. Go play your silly games somewhere else.”

In other words — you can’t explain your earlier comment, am I right?

“If you defend him (Dan Rickman) then I prove my case beyond any reasonable doubt”

If you (or anyone else here) can’t substantiate your allegations that I am an anti-Semite and “obsessed with Jews” — I’ll assume that they are unfounded.

The ball is in your court.

Berchamans is dumb as a doorknob. He appeared on the scene about three years ago. He is like CiF’s self-appointed agent provocateur. His basic modus operandi is to provoke us. You fight back and he clicks to alert CiF censors to get you premodded. He is not alone like that. There are others like him.

You suck as a wind-up artist. You are just too primitive to finesses it. I know what you will say ten turns ahead. Go play your silly games somewhere else.